Misplaced Pages

Here is a great list of things to know and remember about this online encyclopedia -- it came in handy to me when first starting to edit Misplaced Pages and I still refer to it when necessary.

I have certain principles governing this talk page which I expect you to adhere to if you post here. (This talk page is my "territory", (although I acknowledge it's not really mine, it's the community's) and I assume janitorial responsibility for it.

• If leaving a new message, please see "...click here to leave me a message" notice above.
• If posting a reply to a comment, please place your new comments underneath the comment you are replying to.
• Please indent your posts with ":" if replying to an existing topic (or "::" if replying to a reply).
• Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end.
• I will generally respond to comments on this Talk page that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page; you may want to watch this page until you are responded to.
• I prefer a clean talk page and will delete old messages after a reasonable period of time. The history tab will show you a complete list of all past comments if you are interested.
• Comments such as these are appreciated and welcome: constructive criticism in the spirit of being helpful and editing collegially; corrections as appropriate and necessary in the spirit of being helpful and editing collegially.
• Comments such as these are not appreciated and are unwelcome: a barrage or onslaught of negatively-tinged comments that include, but are not limited to, demands for answers; unconstructive criticism in the spirit of being negative for negative's sake; templates placed in the spirit of retaliation or 'just because'; harassment; personal attacks.
• If you want a reply to comments left here, please allow time for that to happen. In the case of possible contention or disagreement, I may need time to "cool down" and collect my thoughts (or just reply helpfully and wisely) before responding to talk page comments/questions. Please keep this in mind, and remember to act like the kind of adults we are all expected to emulate here at The Project.
• I reserve the right to delete talk page comments or questions without answering them if I sense baiting, unneeded confrontation, hostility, inappropriate aggression, and/or misdirected anger - don't expect a response to these types of comments.
• I realize I don't "own" this talk page, however, I reserve the right to tell you to not leave comments here if you have demonstrated a consistent lack of good faith toward me and/or continually leave nothing but negative and/or harassing comments on this talk page.
• I may, without notice, refactor comments to put like with like, correct indents, or retitle sections to reflect their contents more clearly. If I inadvertently change the meaning of anything, please let me know so I can fix it.
• Blatant vandalism will not be tolerated and will be removed on the spot.

Natalie Wood

What definition of "disruption" do you use when you define MathewTownsend's latest edits as disruptive? They are minor improvements in sources and wordings as far as I can see. He was also under no obligation to stop editing the page. Your reversion of a minor change in word was did not promote collaboration or a collegial editing athmosphere - but looked quite a lot like an assertion of ownership. Please edit collaboratively, don't revert constructive edits unless there is a compelling reason to do so.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 18:44, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Well, color me confused. You leave a message on his talk page yesterday that essentially says, "You are being disruptive", and now you ask me why I think he was being disruptive? As far as his obligation to stay way from the Natalie Wood article, you told him to stay away from the article and he agreed to it. You told me to either stay away from the article or to stop interacting with him. I said I would stop interacting with him. He didn't keep his end of the bargain and was back to editing the article just 19 hours later. And now, you're chastising me for reverting his edit more than 12 hours later and after you told him (and only him) he was editing disruptively and might get blocked? Again - confusing. Mixed messages. Huge disconnect. And accusations based on what, exactly...? Incorrect assumptions just like MathewTownsend has made at the article talk page? Please, if you want to deliver an administrative "spanking", be consistent. Otherwise, your words and your actions make it seem as if you don't know which end is up, when it's up. I'm fine with doing what admins tell me to do, but when it looks like what you've put on my talk page here, what you put hours prior on MathewTownsend's talk page, and you immediately thereafter protected the article because of MathewTownsend's disruption all conflict and contradict each other, it's hard for me to take you seriously. If you had second thoughts about protecting the article and chastising the other editor, then say so. But please don't come here and get all over the original messenger because you now think you made a mistake. Lhb1239 (talk) 22:01, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:7 World Trade Center

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:7 World Trade Center. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Hey moron

I'm not an administrator anymore so how about you go fuck yourself?·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 17:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)