| Revision as of 04:57, 16 December 2011 view sourceSupreme Deliciousness (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,574 edits →Problematic edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:49, 16 December 2011 view source Jiujitsuguy (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers5,155 edits →Problematic edit: rplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| You made this revert at the Yom Kippur War and removed content attributed to a reliable source. Your edit summary states ''Not clear what happened,has been labeled psyops, '''been debunked by Syria''',see:"Propaganda and Information Warfare in the Twenty-First Century: Altered Images and Deception Operations (Contemporary Security Studies) " p68, if re ad it needs re-write''(sic). Can you please tell me where it says anywhere in the source that the claim was "debunked" by Syria. The source states that the Syrians went to great lengths to debunk the claim but I don't see anywhere where the author supports the contention that the Syrians succeeded in their efforts. So please tell me why you reverted reliably sourced content and then placed a falsehood in the edit summary to back your reversion.--] (]) 04:18, 16 December 2011 (UTC) | You made this revert at the Yom Kippur War and removed content attributed to a reliable source. Your edit summary states ''Not clear what happened,has been labeled psyops, '''been debunked by Syria''',see:"Propaganda and Information Warfare in the Twenty-First Century: Altered Images and Deception Operations (Contemporary Security Studies) " p68, if re ad it needs re-write''(sic). Can you please tell me where it says anywhere in the source that the claim was "debunked" by Syria. The source states that the Syrians went to great lengths to debunk the claim but I don't see anywhere where the author supports the contention that the Syrians succeeded in their efforts. So please tell me why you reverted reliably sourced content and then placed a falsehood in the edit summary to back your reversion.--] (]) 04:18, 16 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :For some reason, I cant access the page in Google books now. Not sure what it said as it was 9 months ago I read it, I think it was something that Syria denied the allegation, thats what I meant with "debunked by Syria", as English is not my first language I sometimes make mistakes with my English, the word I was looking for was "denied". Also notice that I said at the beginning ''"Not clear what happened"'', which is an indication of that I didn't mean that Syria had ''"proven"'' it to be false. --] (]) 04:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC) | :For some reason, I cant access the page in Google books now. Not sure what it said as it was 9 months ago I read it, I think it was something that Syria denied the allegation, thats what I meant with "debunked by Syria", as English is not my first language I sometimes make mistakes with my English, the word I was looking for was "denied". Also notice that I said at the beginning ''"Not clear what happened"'', which is an indication of that I didn't mean that Syria had ''"proven"'' it to be false. --] (]) 04:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::You've been editing for three years under this account (not to mention other accounts and IPs you've edited under) with some 16,000 edits, some of them evidencing high caliber English. To say that your answer stretches credulity is a gross understatement. Have others been editing for you? Secondly, why didn't you just add, "though this was 'debunked' or 'denied' or 'disputed' by Syria," and add the appropriate reference rather than revert reliably sourced content that had been corroborated by numerous other sources. Could it be SD that while I was topic banned you went searching for my edits in every article that I edited, and knowing that I could do nothing, systematically reverted everything I did?--] (]) 18:49, 16 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:49, 16 December 2011
/
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Snowolf 05:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Women and children on the march Six-Day War.jpg
Are you positive that there is absolutely no free equivalent to that image? Assuming that there is no free equivalent I still see another problem. You have a non free use rationale for the article Golan Heights. I don't believe that the image would satisfy policy 8 of WP:NFC which states that "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding". I don't believe that is true for the article Golan Heights; however, it may be true for the article Six-day War. Ryan Vesey Review me! 21:24, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have replied at User talk:Ryan Vesey. Ryan Vesey Review me! 21:48, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Just so you know, an administrator and another editor have commented on the issue regarding the image. Do you have my talk page watched? Ryan Vesey Review me! 04:27, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 16:31, 14 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ryan Vesey Review me! 16:31, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Problematic edit
You made this revert at the Yom Kippur War and removed content attributed to a reliable source. Your edit summary states Not clear what happened,has been labeled psyops, been debunked by Syria,see:"Propaganda and Information Warfare in the Twenty-First Century: Altered Images and Deception Operations (Contemporary Security Studies) " p68, if re ad it needs re-write(sic). Can you please tell me where it says anywhere in the source that the claim was "debunked" by Syria. The source states that the Syrians went to great lengths to debunk the claim but I don't see anywhere where the author supports the contention that the Syrians succeeded in their efforts. So please tell me why you reverted reliably sourced content and then placed a falsehood in the edit summary to back your reversion.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 04:18, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- For some reason, I cant access the page in Google books now. Not sure what it said as it was 9 months ago I read it, I think it was something that Syria denied the allegation, thats what I meant with "debunked by Syria", as English is not my first language I sometimes make mistakes with my English, the word I was looking for was "denied". Also notice that I said at the beginning "Not clear what happened", which is an indication of that I didn't mean that Syria had "proven" it to be false. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 04:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- You've been editing for three years under this account (not to mention other accounts and IPs you've edited under) with some 16,000 edits, some of them evidencing high caliber English. To say that your answer stretches credulity is a gross understatement. Have others been editing for you? Secondly, why didn't you just add, "though this was 'debunked' or 'denied' or 'disputed' by Syria," and add the appropriate reference rather than revert reliably sourced content that had been corroborated by numerous other sources. Could it be SD that while I was topic banned you went searching for my edits in every article that I edited, and knowing that I could do nothing, systematically reverted everything I did?--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 18:49, 16 December 2011 (UTC)