| Revision as of 05:50, 17 December 2011 editMalik Shabazz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers106,163 editsm Talkback (User talk:Malik Shabazz#accusations of "vandalism") (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:52, 17 December 2011 edit undoMalik Shabazz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers106,163 edits →December 2011: sanctions notificationNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| I haven't broken the 1RR or 3RR rules in that '''I haven't reverted the article once''' if you took time to check. Editing is not necessarily re-verting and Misplaced Pages itself encourages users to be bold and make edits. ] (]) 05:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC) | I haven't broken the 1RR or 3RR rules in that '''I haven't reverted the article once''' if you took time to check. Editing is not necessarily re-verting and Misplaced Pages itself encourages users to be bold and make edits. ] (]) 05:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| {| class="messagebox" style="width: 100%; background: ivory;" | |||
| | ] | |||
| | | |||
| | The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], any expected ], or any ]. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the ] section of the decision page. | |||
| Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> | |||
| |} — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 05:52, 17 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==Talkback== | ==Talkback== | ||
| {{talkback|Malik Shabazz|accusations of "vandalism"|ts=05:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC)}} | {{talkback|Malik Shabazz|accusations of "vandalism"|ts=05:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC)}} | ||
Revision as of 05:52, 17 December 2011
December 2011
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did at Palestinian people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 05:40, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is not vandalism, these are legitimate edits. Stop threatenting me or I will report you to the administrator's board.
Your recent editing history at Palestinian people shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 05:47, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
I haven't broken the 1RR or 3RR rules in that I haven't reverted the article once if you took time to check. Editing is not necessarily re-verting and Misplaced Pages itself encourages users to be bold and make edits. 173.238.69.86 (talk) 05:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
|
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page. |
— Malik Shabazz /Stalk 05:52, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 05:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.