| Revision as of 22:46, 1 April 2006 edit195.82.106.244 (talk) →Destruction← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:14, 3 April 2006 edit undo70.119.13.124 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| This article refers to the " destruction of the World " meaning the similar to understanding most Christians have of ] or modern day Christian evanglists call " ] ". It is referred to by the BKWSU as " Destruction " and so that is the term used here, as clarified in the article. It does not mean the destruction of the planet Earth. | This article refers to the " destruction of the World " meaning the similar to understanding most Christians have of ] or modern day Christian evanglists call " ] ". It is referred to by the BKWSU as " Destruction " and so that is the term used here, as clarified in the article. It does not mean the destruction of the planet Earth. | ||
| ] 22:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC) | ] 22:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ===Neutrality of this information=== | |||
| ] 14:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC) It is evident that the person who originated this article does not sympathize with Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University. Reasons: | |||
| 1)There is no need to add a heading such as B.K.s beware! if the person truly thought this article was written in good faith and neutral. | |||
| 2)There are links which rather than further explaining about the subject matter: Brahma Kumaris, those links basically point to groups that are not Brahma Kumaris related. It is sort of trying to explain Christianity by pointing to links were non-christian believers express their opinions. | |||
| 3)There is obvious misinformation about the knowledge, practices and the meaning of "spiritual university." | |||
| Most of the information given is just the experience of the writer (negative experience) with perhaps a particular group. That cannot be considered "unbias" or "neutral." | |||
| 4)Even when referring to the word "Destruction" there is an obvious misinformation. The writer cannot take Christianity as the "measuring stick" in order to understand a new movement like Brahma Kumaris. If the writer looks up in the dictionary the world destruction, it means:an event (or the result of an event) that completely destroys something also: a final state; That is not the word to use when someone is aware that matter cannot be created neither destroyed (first law of thermodynamics)and that according to BK knowledge the world will continue on as it always has, thus there is no destruction but rather transformation. To say "I am using destruction as the Christians use it: Armagedon" is not writing in a neutral language but rather biased and opinionated language. | |||
| 5) It would be good to know what the author believes gives him/her authority to write about an institution.This should be checked by WIKIPEDIA, otherwise; this site is merely a place to voice someone's opinion. | |||
Revision as of 14:14, 3 April 2006
B.K.s beware !
This is a polite warning to followers of Brahma Kumari Raja Yoga ...
- Beware, this is not an advert for Brahma Kumari Raja Yoga. This is an objective definition of you and your religion.
If you are new to Raja Yoga and unsure of what is being written here, please check with your senior sister for accuracy before removing or editing facts.
Thank you.
Contributors wanted
But please join the discussion page before making your edits. Outright vandalism will be reported.
Destruction
This article refers to the " destruction of the World " meaning the similar to understanding most Christians have of Armageddon or modern day Christian evanglists call " end times ". It is referred to by the BKWSU as " Destruction " and so that is the term used here, as clarified in the article. It does not mean the destruction of the planet Earth. 195.82.106.244 22:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Neutrality of this information
70.119.13.124 14:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC) It is evident that the person who originated this article does not sympathize with Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University. Reasons: 1)There is no need to add a heading such as B.K.s beware! if the person truly thought this article was written in good faith and neutral. 2)There are links which rather than further explaining about the subject matter: Brahma Kumaris, those links basically point to groups that are not Brahma Kumaris related. It is sort of trying to explain Christianity by pointing to links were non-christian believers express their opinions. 3)There is obvious misinformation about the knowledge, practices and the meaning of "spiritual university." Most of the information given is just the experience of the writer (negative experience) with perhaps a particular group. That cannot be considered "unbias" or "neutral." 4)Even when referring to the word "Destruction" there is an obvious misinformation. The writer cannot take Christianity as the "measuring stick" in order to understand a new movement like Brahma Kumaris. If the writer looks up in the dictionary the world destruction, it means:an event (or the result of an event) that completely destroys something also: a final state; That is not the word to use when someone is aware that matter cannot be created neither destroyed (first law of thermodynamics)and that according to BK knowledge the world will continue on as it always has, thus there is no destruction but rather transformation. To say "I am using destruction as the Christians use it: Armagedon" is not writing in a neutral language but rather biased and opinionated language. 5) It would be good to know what the author believes gives him/her authority to write about an institution.This should be checked by WIKIPEDIA, otherwise; this site is merely a place to voice someone's opinion.