Misplaced Pages

Intellectual dishonesty: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:45, 19 August 2008 edit12.27.22.76 (talk) Added: intellectual dishonesty can be advocating of a position not known to be true, & failure to perform rigorous due diligence to check truthfulness - acting as though the position were true.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:05, 26 December 2011 edit undoViriditas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers169,207 edits Redirect to sourced article 
(37 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#redirect ]
'''Intellectual dishonesty''' is the advocacy of a position which the advocate knows or believes to be false, or is the advocacy of a position which the advocate does not know to be true, and has not performed rigorous due diligence to insure the truthfulness of the position. ] is used to advance an ] or to reinforce one's deeply held ]s in the face of overwhelming contrary ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.123exp-beliefs.com/t/00804199459/|title=Intellectual dishonesty (in philosophy)|date=2008-07-01|publisher=Enlexica, Inc.|accessdate=2008-07-16}}</ref> If a person is aware of the evidence and agrees with the conclusion it portends, yet advocates a contradictory view, they commit intellectual dishonesty. If the person is unaware of the evidence, their position is ], even if in agreement with the scientific conclusion.

The terms ''intellectually dishonest'' and ''intellectual dishonesty'' are often used as rhetorical devices in a debate; the label invariably frames an opponent in a negative light.

The phrase is also frequently used by orators when a debate foe or audience reaches a conclusion varying from the speaker's on a given subject. This appears mostly in debates or discussions of speculative, non-scientific issues, such as ] or ].
== See also ==
* In specific fields:
** ]
** ]
** ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

==Footnotes==
<references/>

==References==
*Colin McNickle, ''More intellectual dishonesty on guns'', December 15, 2002, The Pittsburg Tribune Review,
*Editorial, ''Intellectual dishonesty'', Jerusalem Post, May 20, 2006,

]
]

{{philo-stub}}

Latest revision as of 00:05, 26 December 2011

Redirect to: