| Revision as of 06:26, 22 April 2006 editSpencerk (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers4,233 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:05, 26 December 2011 edit undoViriditas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers169,230 edits Redirect to sourced article | ||
| (92 intermediate revisions by 54 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #redirect ] | |||
| {{merge|Research}} | |||
| '''Intellectual dishonesty''' is the creation of misleading impressions through the use of ], ], ], or misrepresented evidence. It may stem from an ulterior motive, haste, sloppiness, or external pressure to reach a certain conclusion. The truth value of work may be lost as a result. | |||
| Scientists and scholars generally consider ] a serious form of intellectual dishonesty. Other examples include the incorrect attribution of a quotation or quotation out of context, use of obfuscated or irrelevant citations, deceptive omission of contextual text through ], and the unsupported amplification of a relationship. | |||
| ==Intellectual abuse== | |||
| Often, individuals with experience or training in ]s can exploit certain strategies of persuasion or "]". This also appears in overuse of esoteric terminology, or the use of unnecessary ideas in a sentance, like "]". (''see ]''). | |||
| ==See also== | |||
| * In specific fields: | |||
| **] | |||
| **] | |||
| **] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| {{philo-stub}} | |||
Latest revision as of 00:05, 26 December 2011
Redirect to: