Revision as of 12:10, 1 January 2012 editDangerousPanda (talk | contribs)38,827 edits →Happy New Year~!: add← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:30, 1 January 2012 edit undoElockid (talk | contribs)42,430 edits →Block Warning: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:41, 1 January 2012 (UTC) | It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:41, 1 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Block Warning == | |||
again, and I can guarantee you a block. <span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:14px"><b><font color="#AD1C24">]</font></b></span> <sup>(<font color="#00FF7F">]</font>)</sup> 13:30, 1 January 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:30, 1 January 2012
Welcome
Hello, Andriabenia, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Georgia (country) have not conformed to Misplaced Pages's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Misplaced Pages articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Misplaced Pages also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dave 15:01, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Apologies
Okay, you're a newbie and I've chewed your ass out, entirely my fault, alright? It's Christmas, let's just bury the hatchet and unhappiness, shall we? Dave 16:38, 24 December 2011 (UTC) |
- And another thing, please don't do this or you might regret it later when someone else reports you. It's downright negative, insulting and impolite but I'm not in that mood to report you since it's Christmas, cheers and best~! (PS:On second thought, maybe I will report since you're not responding by removing that offensive statement! Btw, Merry Christmas~!) --Dave 16:41, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Please drop the patronizing tone and feel free to report me for whatever you want. And don't worry, I could care less about Christmas, this is just another day.--Andriabenia (talk) 17:00, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, I was going to kiss and make up with you but you just had to make it worst than it already is. Don't blame me when you're the one burning the bridge beneath your feet. --Dave 17:08, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, such colorful language...--Andriabenia (talk) 17:11, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not as colourful as I admired you to be. --Dave 18:36, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Tamara Toumanova
Hi. I was just curious as to how Toumanova could have been born, barring illegitimacy, with her mother's maiden name (Tumanishvili). Her father's surname was apparently Khazidowich-Boretski or Khassidovitch, so wouldn't her birthname have been Tamara Vladimirovna Khassidovitch (or Khazidowich-Boretski)??
Yours, Quis separabit? 19:17, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- P.S.: I get that you feel strongly about this article (and doubtless other articles pertaining to Georgia), but remember you don't own the article. Quis separabit? 19:22, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Eugenia gave her her own name because I don't think it was entirely clear who she belonged to. The reliable source I am about the include says that Eugenia's first husband, and real father of Tamara, was Konstantin Zakharov. I am going through some other sources and will let you know. I'm not making this up --Andriabenia (talk) 19:24, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I wasn't implying you were making anything up. I just didn't get why Toumanova would have been given her twice-married mother's maiden name, given the scandal of illegitimacy that would have resulted, not to mention the impact on her parents' relationship as her mother was denying that her husband fathered her child. Pretty bold stuff for that time and place. What I wonder is what name appeared on Toumanova's birth certificate. Yours, Quis separabit? 19:31, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Well, scandals were quite common for socialites like Eugenia at the time. Plus, Tumanishvili is a noble last name and I don't think noble women automatically gave up their last names in favor of those that were not. In any case, she could have just said that Tumanishvili was her married name and they would not be able to verify it, definitely not on the train or anywhere else in Siberia or China. I'm translating some sources right now, trying to solve this.--Andriabenia (talk) 19:45, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, I just noticed that the Toumanova page has been disabled from editing due to edit warring. I just wanted to let you know that when I last edited the page I was not aware that the intervening edit had been made by Rast5, with whom you are disputing, and assumed you had made the changes (birth name, etc.) I didn't check the edit history at the time. Anyway I am not a partisan in this matter and please feel free to remove (after the page is editable again) anything I may have added or restored which is factually inaccurate. Happy Holidays. Yours, Quis separabit? 11:07, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Empress Maria (Martha of Georgia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Bagrat IV
- Georgia (country) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Macedonia
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
December 2011
Thank you for trying to keep Misplaced Pages free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Tamara Toumanova, are not considered vandalism under Misplaced Pages guidelines. Misplaced Pages has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Misplaced Pages:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. causa sui (talk) 19:55, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello, Andriabenia. You have new messages at Causa sui's talk page.Message added 17:07, 28 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
causa sui (talk) 17:07, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Tbilisi
Kindly request to stop editing and explain yourself here. You are removing well-sourced information. Why? More than half of the table is Soviet census, and I'll get back on the 1897 Imperial census in a moment, but it is just one line in the table. Materialscientist (talk) 09:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- So why are you removing the table? Materialscientist (talk) 09:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- The ethnicity in the 1897 census was assigned by mother tongue, which was asked in the census. What does it change for Tbilisi, which was part of Russia? Mother tongue is one of the most distinctive attributes of ethnicity. Materialscientist (talk) 09:13, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- I see your point, but (i) your reference goes to the 1897 all-Russian imperial census, whereas the older data in the table are from other sources. I have access to the source on 1864/65 data, and it says the data are on "nationality/ethnicity", not on mother tongue. It is not the all-Russian imperial census, but a local (Caucasus) census. (ii) There is no clear definition of ethnicity, and if any, mother tongue is the easiest defining points, as the other one - "culture" - is much more vague. (iii) The 1897 census was the first census to attempt interviewing every household - yes, but every household on the national scale. We are talking about a single and major town, not even a rural area. Materialscientist (talk) 09:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, Happy New Year! I have no access to the Anchabadze book, but read the geographic dictionary of the Russian empire, and it seems detailed and reliable. My issue is not the accuracy, which is impossible to evaluate now (there is valid criticism of old Russian censuses, but it hardly applies to major towns). All data agree on that Tbilisi had comparable fractions of Georgians, Armenians and Russians for a long period of, very roughly, 1850-1950. I see nothing 'biased' or 'wrong' with it as some other editors implied - it is just an important and non-trivial historical fact which is worth documenting. Materialscientist (talk) 10:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- I've made some changes, toward deletion. The sources could be replaced, as local censuses were conducted frequently (see e.g. p. 9) but I want strong sources and am not keen to search for them right now (holiday mood :-). Materialscientist (talk) 11:22, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, Happy New Year! I have no access to the Anchabadze book, but read the geographic dictionary of the Russian empire, and it seems detailed and reliable. My issue is not the accuracy, which is impossible to evaluate now (there is valid criticism of old Russian censuses, but it hardly applies to major towns). All data agree on that Tbilisi had comparable fractions of Georgians, Armenians and Russians for a long period of, very roughly, 1850-1950. I see nothing 'biased' or 'wrong' with it as some other editors implied - it is just an important and non-trivial historical fact which is worth documenting. Materialscientist (talk) 10:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- I see your point, but (i) your reference goes to the 1897 all-Russian imperial census, whereas the older data in the table are from other sources. I have access to the source on 1864/65 data, and it says the data are on "nationality/ethnicity", not on mother tongue. It is not the all-Russian imperial census, but a local (Caucasus) census. (ii) There is no clear definition of ethnicity, and if any, mother tongue is the easiest defining points, as the other one - "culture" - is much more vague. (iii) The 1897 census was the first census to attempt interviewing every household - yes, but every household on the national scale. We are talking about a single and major town, not even a rural area. Materialscientist (talk) 09:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- The ethnicity in the 1897 census was assigned by mother tongue, which was asked in the census. What does it change for Tbilisi, which was part of Russia? Mother tongue is one of the most distinctive attributes of ethnicity. Materialscientist (talk) 09:13, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Oops
I have no idea how this happened; I don't even remember looking at ANI yesterday, let alone reverting someone. It was some kind of slipup. I can only apologise. --Dweller (talk) 09:29, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hrs for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:24, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Seems a bit unfair that that a previously-blocked, chronic edit warring user like rast5 gets the same punishment as I.--Andriabenia (talk) 11:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Blocking is not a punishment; it's to prevent further disruption to the project. --Dweller (talk) 11:53, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Were you just as involved in the edit wars? Is it fair that you would have the chance to go back to restore your preferred version of the articles a whole 24 hours before they do? Indeed, when both blocks expire, how you BOTH handle the situation will be a good indicator of what happens next. Take the high road, if you believe that you're a better person. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:05, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Happy New Year~!
Happy New Year~! | |
Happy new year to you~! FYI, the next block is going to be even longer if you don't stop your edit warring behaviour. That aside, here's a lovely unicorn to brighten up your day. Cheers and best~! Dave 23:40, 30 December 2011 (UTC) |
You'll never leave me alone will you?! I hope it's not because you think I'm an attractive female named Andria - that has happened before - because its a male name where I'm from : -)--Andriabenia (talk) 12:25, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- *snicker* I've personally never met a female spelled "Andria" - only males. Females are typically "Andrea". However, take kind greetings whenever they're put forward - there's so darned few of them around here sometimes (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:17, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- So true. --Dave 08:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Bwilkins, did you just extend my block? According to the log, it was supposed to expire at 11:23 on January 1,which passed, but now it says 16:25, 1 January: "Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Andriabenia". The reason given for Andriabenia's block is: "Edit warring". It seems ridiculous that the block would be extended just because I logged on : -).--Andriabenia (talk) 11:46, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Your block log would have shown if I had extended it. There's nothing that shows you're blocked. If there's an autoblock, you need to post exactly what you're advised to (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:05, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Nicholas Marr, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Agrippina and Kartvelian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Block Warning
Write this again, and I can guarantee you a block. Elockid 13:30, 1 January 2012 (UTC)