| Revision as of 01:43, 4 April 2006 editJonathan.s.kt (talk | contribs)13,249 editsm →See also: Caps← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:55, 4 April 2006 edit undoAndries (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers27,090 edits removed statement unsupported by references since 16 Mar. in sppite of requestNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| Similar belief processes were studied by ]. In his study on the sociology of science, '']'' Kuhn demonstrates that scientists can hold onto beliefs in scientific theories despite overwhelming prevailing counter-evidence, and suggested that social forces, as much as ones purely concerned with rationality, are a strong influence on the beliefs we hold. This is an area studied by the ] where the social function of paranormal beliefs has been a focus of research. | Similar belief processes were studied by ]. In his study on the sociology of science, '']'' Kuhn demonstrates that scientists can hold onto beliefs in scientific theories despite overwhelming prevailing counter-evidence, and suggested that social forces, as much as ones purely concerned with rationality, are a strong influence on the beliefs we hold. This is an area studied by the ] where the social function of paranormal beliefs has been a focus of research. | ||
| <!-- cite requested 16 Mar 06 -->This is closely related to religious faith. Faith and faithfulness are regarded as positive attributes. The distinction is that belief in a mainstream thought (such as a major religion) is respected, yet belief in a fringe (unpopular) thought is ridiculed.{{fact}} | |||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 19:55, 4 April 2006
The true-believer syndrome is a term coined by the reformed psychic fraud M. Lamar Keene to refer to an irrational belief in the paranormal. Skeptics see this as a form of self-deception caused by wishful thinking in which a believer continues to accept paranormal explanations for phenomena or events, or denies the relevance of scientific findings, even after the believer has been confronted with abundant evidence that the phenomena or events have natural causes. The term is mainly used by skeptics in the debate over the existence of certain sorts of paranormal phenomena and the persistence of belief in these phenomena.
For example, skeptics generally agree there is sufficient proof to conclude that the alleged miracles of Uri Geller and Sathya Sai Baba are or were false; they therefore have often reasoned that believers who have been given the extant evidence of fraud in these cases, and yet continue to believe in these men, are described by this condition. Some ex-followers of Sathya Sai Baba accept true-believer syndrome as an explanation of what has happened to them.,
Robert T. Carroll, the webmaster of the Skeptic's Dictionary, sees some similarity with a pathological delusion.
The term was not coined by mainstream psychologists, is not used in the scientific literature, and has not been included in the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. No clinical evidence has been provided for its links with demonstrable cognitive impairment or psychopathology.
Similar belief processes were studied by Thomas Kuhn. In his study on the sociology of science, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Kuhn demonstrates that scientists can hold onto beliefs in scientific theories despite overwhelming prevailing counter-evidence, and suggested that social forces, as much as ones purely concerned with rationality, are a strong influence on the beliefs we hold. This is an area studied by the sociology of knowledge where the social function of paranormal beliefs has been a focus of research.
See also
- Psychology of religion
- Consensus theory of truth
- Delusion
- Sociology of knowledge
- Cognitive dissonance
References
Quotes
- Some things have to be believed to be seen. — Ralph Hodgson
Bibliography
- M. Lamar Keene (as told to Allen Spraggett), The Psychic Mafia, Prometheus Books, 1997, ISBN 1573921610