| Revision as of 09:33, 16 January 2012 editBulwersator (talk | contribs)17,067 edits →Re:User_talk:Bulwersator: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:28, 17 January 2012 edit undoPumpkinSky (talk | contribs)20,866 edits sopa blackoutNext edit → | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| Sorry, it was a mistake ] (]) 09:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC) | Sorry, it was a mistake ] (]) 09:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ==SOPA Blackout== | |||
| Hi Giacomo. I was wondering where you stand on the SOPA blackout. Personally I think the blackout is a bad idea. If Jimbo and Sue (who does not speak for me) want to make a statement on SOPA, they should find another way. ] ] 03:28, 17 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:28, 17 January 2012
Old messages are at:
- User talk:Giano II/archive 1 (From Oct 2004)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 2 (From Jan 2005)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 3 (From July 2005)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 4 (From Jan 2006)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 5 (From July 2006)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 6 (From Jan 2007)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 7 (From July 2007)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 8 (From Jan 2008)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 9 (From July 2008)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 10 (From Jan 2009)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 11 (From July 2009)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 12 (From Jan 2010)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 13 (From July 2010)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 14 (From Jan 2011)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 15 (From July 2011)
- User talk:Giano II/archive 16 (from Jan 2012)
IRC - where Misplaced Pages's real decisons are taken!
- 2007:It appears this royal proclamation about IRC was never really true, just something invented to discredit those who said otherwise during an arbcom case. So, why should we beleive any of them now?
- This is the sort of rubbish case the Arbs and IRC can dream up when you start to criticise IRC Admins.Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/IRC, it should be essential reading for every editor who is not an admin.
- here was the pathetic result; I never accepted it, it was unenforcable and as a consequence not one of these blocks held (just look at the admins names - what became of any of them?) and the Arbcom was rightly reduced in stature as a result. It has learnt nothing! Nothing at all!
- 2011:My views on the secreteive Misplaced Pages Admins chanel Nothing has changed at all!
Please leave new messages below
"Williamite"
Since "Williamite" is a style designation applied to the former Stoke Edith House, I've made an addition to "Williamite". Can you improve it? (I'd never use the term myself.)--Wetman (talk) 14:44, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- That's a new term for me, I have always called them Carolean. Would I be write in thinking that the now desyroyed Coleshill House wouldhave come under that umbrella? I will have a look around through the library tomoworrow (when I have more time). Very interesting. Giacomo Returned 16:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Mentmore groundfloor.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mentmore groundfloor.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Mentmore overhead 2.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mentmore overhead 2.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
File:MentmoreRooflessexpirement.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MentmoreRooflessexpirement.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- I woul dhave thought that saying : "plan drawn by me for use in futire article; this is a prototye uploaded to see how it looks in scale and size. Template:"PD-self Keep local) made it perfectly obvious to even the most stupid what the image is required for. Furthermore, it links to an unfinished page in user space. Giacomo Returned 09:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Re:User_talk:Bulwersator
Sorry, it was a mistake Bulwersator (talk) 09:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
SOPA Blackout
Hi Giacomo. I was wondering where you stand on the SOPA blackout. Personally I think the blackout is a bad idea. If Jimbo and Sue (who does not speak for me) want to make a statement on SOPA, they should find another way. PumpkinSky talk 03:28, 17 January 2012 (UTC)