Misplaced Pages

Norman Finkelstein: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:16, 6 April 2006 view sourceRagout (talk | contribs)322 edits rv. last version has extremely biased POV, draws unsupported conclusions ("could not have checked"). See Talk.← Previous edit Revision as of 03:23, 6 April 2006 view source Deuterium (talk | contribs)972 edits RV OR violation (see Talk). Also, minor NPOV.Next edit →
Line 18: Line 18:
Finkelstein has taken other controversial positions. In ''The Holocaust Industry'', he described ] as a corrupt "racket," in which little of the money actually goes to victims and too much goes to lawyers involved. He has also challenged the characterization of the Holocaust as a uniquely evil historical event, and likened Israeli security to the ]. Questioned explicitly about his views on ], Finkelstein has said that rather than violence, ] should pursue independence through "non-violent civil revolt." Finkelstein has taken other controversial positions. In ''The Holocaust Industry'', he described ] as a corrupt "racket," in which little of the money actually goes to victims and too much goes to lawyers involved. He has also challenged the characterization of the Holocaust as a uniquely evil historical event, and likened Israeli security to the ]. Questioned explicitly about his views on ], Finkelstein has said that rather than violence, ] should pursue independence through "non-violent civil revolt."


He been called a "terrorist sympathizer" for what critics term his "bizarre" views on ]. Frequently quoted is Finkelstein's statement, "Frankly, part of me says - even though everything since September 11 has been a nightmare--'you know what, we deserve the problem on our hands because some things Bin Laden says are true'. One of the things he said on that last tape was that 'until we live in security, you're not going to live in security', and there is a certain amount of rightness in that." Finkelstein and his defenders respond that Finkelstein opposes terrorism, and say that his views are actually "banal" and commonplace: he is merely trying to "locate the Bin Laden phenomenon in some deeper social and political current." He been called a "terrorist sympathizer" for his views regarding ]. Frequently quoted is Finkelstein's statement, "Frankly, part of me says - even though everything since September 11 has been a nightmare--'you know what, we deserve the problem on our hands because some things Bin Laden says are true'. One of the things he said on that last tape was that 'until we live in security, you're not going to live in security', and there is a certain amount of rightness in that." Finkelstein and his defenders respond that Finkelstein opposes terrorism, and say that his views are actually "banal" and commonplace: he is merely trying to "locate the Bin Laden phenomenon in some deeper social and political current."


==Finkelstein on David Irving and on numbers of Holocaust victims== ==Finkelstein on David Irving and on numbers of Holocaust victims==
Line 34: Line 34:


]]] ]]]
Shortly after the publication of the book '']'', ] accused its author, ] of "fraud, falsification, ] and nonsense." Saying that Dershowitz lacked knowledge about specific contents of his own book during a debate, Finkelstein also claimed that Dershowitz could not have written the book, and may not have even read it. He later cited the presence of "unserious" references, including the web site for a documentary film and an online high school syllabus, as further evidence that the book was ghostwritten. In addition, Finkelstein noted that in twenty instances that all occur within about as many pages, Dershowitz's book cites from the same passages that ] used in her book '']'', often quoting exactly the same words. Shortly after the publication of the book '']'', ] accused its author, ] of "fraud, falsification, plagiarism and nonsense", claiming that Dershowitz had plagiarized Joan Peters' discredited book '']''. Finkelstein expanded his findings in a book entitled ''Beyond Chutzpah'', providing evidence that in at least two instances, Dershowitz reproduces errors in Peters' citiation of original sources, and claims Dershowitz did not check the original sources he cited. The book, which was published by the ] (UCP) on ], ] despite threats of legal action and an appeal to the Governor of California by Alan Dershowitz. . The threats required the Press and Finkelstein to agree on a number of editorial changes and caused a long delay in the publication date, leading Finkelstein to doubt whether the Press would go ahead. On July 9, 2005, editorial negotiations between Finkelstein's representatives and UCP came to a successful conclusion and ''Beyond Chutzpah'' was finally published on 28 August 2005.


Finkelstein noted that in twenty instances that all occur within about as many pages, Dershowitz's book excerpts the same words from the same sources that ] used, largely in the same order. Several paragraph-long quotes that the two books share have ellipses in the same position, Finkelstein pointed out; and in one instance Dershowitz referenced the same page number as Peters, although he was citing a different edition of the source, in which the words appear on a different page..
⚫ Dershowitz asked Harvard to investigate the charge of plagiarism and was exonerated. While '']'', Finkelstein's book containing these allegations, was still in press, Dershowitz threatened libel action and produced his handwritten book manuscript. In consultation with his publisher's lawyers, Finkelstein removed all uses of the word "plagiarism" in favor of less actionable language like "lifted from" and "appropriated without attribution." The charge that Dershowitz was not the true author of ''The Case for Israel'' was also removed, the publisher said, because "he couldn’t document that."


Dershowitz acknowledges that in a number of the instances cited by Finkelstein, he cited references he learned of in Peters' book after having first consulted the original sources, which is the practice recommended by the authoritative ''Chicago Manual of Style.'' In response, Finkelstein suggests that this copying of quotations amounts to copying ideas, and plagiarism is defined as "passing off a source's information, ideas, or words as your own by omitting to cite them." Dershowitz denies that he used any of Peters ideas without citation, noting that he cited Peters numerous times. If Finkelstein is correct that Dershowitz never consulted the original sources he cited, this would violate ''Chicago Manual of Style'' rule 17.274 as well as Harvard's own student writing manual. However, neither of these sources call this practice "plagiarism," and it is very common in academia . "It is such a stupid, unfair, and ridiculous accusation, from biased accusers,” said one of Dershowitz's colleagues, "Everyone does this, it is such a normal thing". Dershowitz asked Harvard to investigate the charges and was exonerated . Dershowitz acknowledges that in a number of the instances cited by Finkelstein, he cited references he learned of in Peters' book after having first consulted the original sources, the practice recommended by the authoritative ''Chicago Manual of Style.'' In response, Finkelstein suggests that this copying of quotations amounts to copying ideas, and plagiarism is defined as "passing off a source's information, ideas, or words as your own by omitting to cite them." . "Finkelstein does not accuse Dershowitz of the wholesale lifting of someone else's words, but he does make a very strong case that Dershowitz has violated the spirit, if not the exact letter, of Harvard's prohibitions of the first three forms of plagiarism." (Michael C. Desch, The American Conservative, December 5, 2005) .


If Finkelstein is correct that Dershowitz never consulted the original sources he cited, this would violate ''Chicago Manual of Style'' rule 17.274 as well as Harvard's own student writing manual. Says Neve Gordon of the National Catholic Reporter, "After a careful examination of the documents Finkelstein presents in Beyond Chutzpah, it is difficult not to infer that the Harvard professor did indeed pass off someone else's information as his own" . However, some argue against Finkelstein by claiming that the practice is common in academia. "It is such a stupid, unfair, and ridiculous accusation, from biased accusers,” said one of Dershowitz's colleagues, "Everyone does this, it is such a normal thing" .
⚫ Despite the attention garnered by Finkelstein's accusations, the bulk of ''Beyond Chutzpah'' actually consists of an essay critiquing the "new anti-semitism" and longer chapters contrasting Dershowitz's arguments in ''The Case for Israel'' with the findings of mainstream human rights organisations, such as ].

⚫ While '']'', Finkelstein's book containing these allegations, was still in press, Dershowitz threatened libel action and produced his handwritten book manuscript. After repeated legal threats from Dershowitz and in consultation with his publisher's lawyers, Finkelstein removed all uses of the word "plagiarism" in favor of less actionable language and "let readers judge for themselves". The charge that Dershowitz was not the true author of ''The Case for Israel'' was also removed, the publisher said, because "he couldn’t document that."

⚫ Despite the attention garnered by Finkelstein's accusation, the bulk of ''Beyond Chutzpah'' actually consists of an essay critiquing the "new anti-semitism" and longer chapters contrasting Dershowitz's arguments in ''The Case for Israel'' with the findings of mainstream human rights organisations, such as ].


== Quotations == == Quotations ==

Revision as of 03:23, 6 April 2006

Norman G. Finkelstein (born December 8 1953), the son of Holocaust survivors, is an American assistant professor of political science at DePaul University known for his controversial writings pertaining to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and for his criticisms of the way he sees the Holocaust being handled by certain parties and organizations. He is the author of five books, of which the most prominent are Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict, The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering and Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History.

Norman G. Finkelstein should not be confused with Norman H. Finkelstein who is an author of several nonfiction books for young adults, some of which are about the State of Israel.

Doctoral thesis and exposure of From Time Immemorial

Finkelstein wrote his Princeton doctoral thesis on Zionism, and it was through this work that he first attracted controversy. In 1984, while Finkelstein was still at Princeton, he began to write a critical review of Joan Peters' book From Time Immemorial in which he examined every footnote and concluded that the book was a "monumental hoax." A "history and defense" of the state of Israel, Peters' book had been effusively praised in mainstream United States media sources. Finkelstein's charges initially roused little attention in the U.S. According to Finkelstein, "By the end of 1984, From Time Immemorial had...received some two hundred notices...in the United States. The only 'false' notes in this crescendoing chorus of praise were the Journal of Palestine Studies, which ran a highly critical review by Bill Farrell; the small Chicago-based newsweekly In These Times, which published a condensed version of this writer's findings; and Alexander Cockburn, who devoted a series of columns in The Nation exposing the hoax....The periodicals in which "From Time Immemorial" had already been favorably reviewed refused to run any critical correspondence (e.g. The New Republic, The Atlantic, Commentary). Periodicals that had yet to review the book rejected a manuscript on the subject as of little or no consequence (e.g. The Village Voice, Dissent, The New York Review of Books). Not a single national newspaper or columnist contacted found newsworthy that a best-selling, effusively praised 'study' of the Middle East conflict was a threadbare hoax" (Finkelstein, Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict, pp. 45-6).

However, after a number of reviewers in the British and Israeli media supported Finkelstein's criticisms, a few U.S. journals began publishing more critical reviews of the book. Today, partly as a result of Finkelstein's analysis and criticism, Peters' book is widely discredited among scholars.

The controversy that surrounded Finkelstein's research caused a delay in his earning his Ph.D. at Princteon. Noam Chomsky, a friend of Finkelstein, wrote in Understanding Power that Finkelstein "literally could not get the faculty to read ." According to Chomsky, Princeton eventually granted Finkelstein his doctorate only "out of embarrassment," though they didn't "even write a letter for him saying that he was a student at Princeton University." (Understanding Power, New York, 2002, p. 245 )

Controversial opinions

Finkelstein's work is often viewed as being controversial. One of his books, The Holocaust industry, was on the top seller lists in many countries where according to an article in Die Welt in which he was interviewed , he points out that Amazon.com data shows the book was number one in South-America, number four in Central-America, number one in Austria, number three in Switzerland and number five in Jordan on the best-selling lists, and it is presently translated into eleven languages. He has gained a popular following in Germany where, according to Haaretz, he is considered a "darling of the extreme right." When he was asked in the same Haaretz article "How does it feel for him to be a favorite of the radical right in Germany?", he replied: "At first I was very puzzled by it," says Finkelstein, "and then I realized I wasn't responsible for it. It was the actions of the Jewish establishment. You can't accuse me of encouraging anti-Semitism. I am only the messenger who reports on the actions of the Jewish establishment, actions that are encouraging anti-Semitism."

However, The Economist wrote: "Mr Finkelstein... is not exerting much influence in the United States. His essays have attracted attention, largely hostile, in Britain, ... but have so far dropped like a stone in America. ...Yet his basic argument that memories of the Holocaust are being debased is serious and should be given its due." Critics in the mainstream Jewish community tend to find the core ideas of The Holocaust Industry less objectionable than the style and tone of "overriding hatred" that they see in Finkelstein's writing.

Finkelstein has taken other controversial positions. In The Holocaust Industry, he described Holocaust reparations as a corrupt "racket," in which little of the money actually goes to victims and too much goes to lawyers involved. He has also challenged the characterization of the Holocaust as a uniquely evil historical event, and likened Israeli security to the Gestapo. Questioned explicitly about his views on terrorism, Finkelstein has said that rather than violence, Palestinians should pursue independence through "non-violent civil revolt."

He been called a "terrorist sympathizer" for his views regarding Osama bin Laden. Frequently quoted is Finkelstein's statement, "Frankly, part of me says - even though everything since September 11 has been a nightmare--'you know what, we deserve the problem on our hands because some things Bin Laden says are true'. One of the things he said on that last tape was that 'until we live in security, you're not going to live in security', and there is a certain amount of rightness in that." Finkelstein and his defenders respond that Finkelstein opposes terrorism, and say that his views are actually "banal" and commonplace: he is merely trying to "locate the Bin Laden phenomenon in some deeper social and political current."

Finkelstein on David Irving and on numbers of Holocaust victims

Finkelstein's critics sometimes like to associate him with Holocaust denier, David Irving. Finkelstein's views on Irving are expressed in The Holocaust Industry, where he states that Irving “notorious as an admirer of Hitler and sympathizer with German national socialism has, nevertheless, as Gordon Craig points out, made an 'indispensable' contribution to our knowledge of World War II." Finkelstein goes on to endorse Craig's dismissal of Irving's holocaust claims as "obtuse and quickly discredited". The "indispensable" comment (made by Craig and quoted by Finkelstein) is specifically about Irving's contribution to the study of the "German side of the Second World War" (Source: The Holocaust Industry, Second Edition, New York: Verso, 2003; page 71-72).

Finkelstein's critics (such as the ADL, see below) also routinely accuse him of holocaust revisionism and in some cases of holocaust denial. Finkelstein himself says that he relies on the work of Raul Hilberg for historical facts about the holocaust and that, on the basis of that research, Finkelstein quotes the numbers of holocaust Jewish victims as being 5.1 million . In The Holocaust Industry Finkelstein did, however, take issue with the numbers of holocaust survivors as quoted by interest-groups seeking holocaust reparations.

Criticism by the Anti-Defamation League

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is typical of Finkelstein's critics who have called him a holocaust denier, and have also accused him of pursuing an anti-Semitic agenda . Finkelstein has called the ADL's accusations against him empty and undeserved. "I am Jewish and my parents are Holocaust survivors. With others you could say, 'you're an anti-Semite' or 'you're a Holocaust denier,' you can't do that with me," he once responded, "you have to argue the facts."

Finkelstein has frequently criticized the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as an organization dedicated not to defense against anti-semitism, but to defamation of critics of Israel. Ultimately, he argues, the ADL trivializes real anti-semitism by "crying wolf" over fraudulent allegations of "the new anti-semitism."

Finkelstein and Alan Dershowitz

Main article: Dershowitz-Finkelstein_Affair
File:Norman finkelstein democracynow.jpg
Norman Finkelstein on Democracy Now!

Shortly after the publication of the book The Case for Israel, Norman Finkelstein accused its author, Alan Dershowitz of "fraud, falsification, plagiarism and nonsense", claiming that Dershowitz had plagiarized Joan Peters' discredited book From Time Immemorial. Finkelstein expanded his findings in a book entitled Beyond Chutzpah, providing evidence that in at least two instances, Dershowitz reproduces errors in Peters' citiation of original sources, and claims Dershowitz did not check the original sources he cited. The book, which was published by the University of California Press (UCP) on June 1, 2005 despite threats of legal action and an appeal to the Governor of California by Alan Dershowitz. . The threats required the Press and Finkelstein to agree on a number of editorial changes and caused a long delay in the publication date, leading Finkelstein to doubt whether the Press would go ahead. On July 9, 2005, editorial negotiations between Finkelstein's representatives and UCP came to a successful conclusion and Beyond Chutzpah was finally published on 28 August 2005.

Finkelstein noted that in twenty instances that all occur within about as many pages, Dershowitz's book excerpts the same words from the same sources that Joan Peters used, largely in the same order. Several paragraph-long quotes that the two books share have ellipses in the same position, Finkelstein pointed out; and in one instance Dershowitz referenced the same page number as Peters, although he was citing a different edition of the source, in which the words appear on a different page..

Dershowitz asked Harvard to investigate the charges and was exonerated . Dershowitz acknowledges that in a number of the instances cited by Finkelstein, he cited references he learned of in Peters' book after having first consulted the original sources, the practice recommended by the authoritative Chicago Manual of Style. In response, Finkelstein suggests that this copying of quotations amounts to copying ideas, and plagiarism is defined as "passing off a source's information, ideas, or words as your own by omitting to cite them." . "Finkelstein does not accuse Dershowitz of the wholesale lifting of someone else's words, but he does make a very strong case that Dershowitz has violated the spirit, if not the exact letter, of Harvard's prohibitions of the first three forms of plagiarism." (Michael C. Desch, The American Conservative, December 5, 2005) .

If Finkelstein is correct that Dershowitz never consulted the original sources he cited, this would violate Chicago Manual of Style rule 17.274 as well as Harvard's own student writing manual. Says Neve Gordon of the National Catholic Reporter, "After a careful examination of the documents Finkelstein presents in Beyond Chutzpah, it is difficult not to infer that the Harvard professor did indeed pass off someone else's information as his own" . However, some argue against Finkelstein by claiming that the practice is common in academia. "It is such a stupid, unfair, and ridiculous accusation, from biased accusers,” said one of Dershowitz's colleagues, "Everyone does this, it is such a normal thing" .

While Beyond Chutzpah, Finkelstein's book containing these allegations, was still in press, Dershowitz threatened libel action and produced his handwritten book manuscript. After repeated legal threats from Dershowitz and in consultation with his publisher's lawyers, Finkelstein removed all uses of the word "plagiarism" in favor of less actionable language and "let readers judge for themselves". The charge that Dershowitz was not the true author of The Case for Israel was also removed, the publisher said, because "he couldn’t document that."

Despite the attention garnered by Finkelstein's accusation, the bulk of Beyond Chutzpah actually consists of an essay critiquing the "new anti-semitism" and longer chapters contrasting Dershowitz's arguments in The Case for Israel with the findings of mainstream human rights organisations, such as Human Rights Watch.

Quotations

  • Noam Chomsky: "I'm delighted to hear that I'll be followed shortly by Norman Finkelstein and would very strongly advise you to come listen to him. Not only an old personal friend but a person who can speak with more authority and insight on these topics than anyone I can think of. So that should be a memorable occasion and I urge that you not miss the opportunity."
  • Leon Wieseltier: "He's poison, a disgusting self-hating Jew, something you find under a rock."
  • Raul Hilberg: (From the rear cover of the second edition of The Holocaust Industry) "When I read Finkelstein's book, The Holocaust Industry, at the time of its appearance, I was in the middle of my own investigations of these matters, and I came to the conclusion that he was on the right track. I refer now to the part of the book that deals with the claims against the Swiss banks, and the other claims pertaining to forced labor. I would now say in retrospect that he was actually conservative, moderate and that his conclusions are trustworthy. He is a well-trained political scientist, has the ability to do the research, did it carefully, and has come up with the right results. I am by no means the only one who, in the coming months or years, will totally agree with Finkelstein's breakthrough."

Bibliography

External links

Profiles

Reviews

Appearances

Criticisms

Categories: