| Revision as of 17:27, 30 August 2005 editEngleman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,569 editsm →Road Infobox vs. this one← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:43, 23 January 2012 edit undoImzadi1979 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors151,547 editsm +categories | ||
| (792 intermediate revisions by 81 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| ==Improvement drive== | |||
| The article on ] is currently nominated on ]. Vote for ] there.--] 09:11, 8 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| == Road Infobox vs. this one == | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| Is there any reason that ] is prefferred over ]? --] 06:33, August 30, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| :Yes there are reasons: the other state hwy WPs use this format, this one provides more info, etc. This project was originally developed to have a multi-state routebox since the CA and WA WPs want certain info in the routebox (but then the project eventually grew to what it is today). There are certain characteristics of an interstate that just aren't adequately ddressed in the road infobox template. --] | |||
| ] | |||
| ::Thanks for the info --] 17:27, August 30, 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:43, 23 January 2012
Redirect to:
Categories: