| Revision as of 02:00, 6 September 2005 editLpangelrob (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers8,109 edits Ridiculously Long Junction Boxes?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:43, 23 January 2012 edit undoImzadi1979 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors151,547 editsm +categories | ||
| (790 intermediate revisions by 80 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| ==Improvement drive== | |||
| The article on ] is currently nominated on ]. Vote for ] there.--] 09:11, 8 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| == Road Infobox vs. this one == | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| Is there any reason that ] is prefferred over ]? --] 06:33, August 30, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| :Yes there are reasons: the other state hwy WPs use this format, this one provides more info, etc. This project was originally developed to have a multi-state routebox since the CA and WA WPs want certain info in the routebox (but then the project eventually grew to what it is today). There are certain characteristics of an interstate that just aren't adequately ddressed in the road infobox template. --] | |||
| ] | |||
| ::Thanks for the info --] 17:27, August 30, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Highway abbreviations == | |||
| I am trying to get the proper abbreviations on all of the highway-related articles. This may sound trivial, but such information is still considered valuable in an encyclopedia. --] 01:11, 2005 September 1 (UTC) | |||
| == Ridiculously Long Junction Boxes? == | |||
| So... wait... I'm still not sure what the Legend is for... is that for the junction box/list? | |||
| If so, doesn't that mean something like ] will end up being ridiculously long? --] 02:00, 6 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:43, 23 January 2012
Redirect to:
Categories: