| Revision as of 02:51, 17 November 2005 editRschen7754 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users123,234 edits →USGS arial photos← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:43, 23 January 2012 edit undoImzadi1979 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors151,547 editsm +categories | ||
| (757 intermediate revisions by 73 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| ==Improvement drive== | |||
| The article on ] is currently nominated on ]. Vote for ] there.--] 09:11, 8 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| == Road Infobox vs. this one == | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| Is there any reason that ] is prefferred over ]? --] 06:33, August 30, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| :Yes there are reasons: the other state hwy WPs use this format, this one provides more info, etc. This project was originally developed to have a multi-state routebox since the CA and WA WPs want certain info in the routebox (but then the project eventually grew to what it is today). There are certain characteristics of an interstate that just aren't adequately ddressed in the road infobox template. --] | |||
| ] | |||
| ::Thanks for the info --] 17:27, August 30, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Highway abbreviations == | |||
| I am trying to get the proper abbreviations on all of the highway-related articles. This may sound trivial, but such information is still considered valuable in an encyclopedia. --] 01:11, 2005 September 1 (UTC) | |||
| == Ridiculously Long Junction Boxes? == | |||
| So... wait... I'm still not sure what the Legend is for... is that for the junction box/list? | |||
| If so, doesn't that mean something like ] will end up being ridiculously long? --] 02:00, 6 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :For the interstates divisible by five, it would probably be best to include only other 2di's. For other 2di's, I would include all 2di's and 3di's. For 3di's I would include definetely all interstates, and perhaps some other major roads. These aren't strict rules; they are just guidelines that I'm following as I begin to bring those boxes into more widespread use. | |||
| :It also might be a good idea to split the legend off, making it just a link. (Many articles won't even need to use the color-coding anyway.) | |||
| :Oh, by the way, if you want to make one for I-90, but don't want to research all of the interchanges out to Boston, I can do from where you leave off in the east and do the rest to Boston. | |||
| :--] 13:42, September 6, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'd agree with Engleman on this one... I prefer that all interstate junctions are listed on all interstates, but then I guess it would be a little long... sorry that I'm not helping with the boxes more. --] 03:25, September 7, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::You could always make a separate page for the long ones, i.e. ]. --] 02:35, 16 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Milepost(TM) style distance formatting ?? == | |||
| Just a thought/question... do you want the articles to have a driving guide, in order from west to east south to north? | |||
| Something like the famous Milepost (distances not correct, just here for example): | |||
| Distance from Los Angeles (LA), followed by state milepost (MP), followed by distance from Dallas (D), followed by distance from Jacksonville (J). Additional intermediate cities: Phoenix (P), El Paso (EP), New Orleans (NO), Mobile (M). | |||
| LA 0 . MP 0 . P 385 . EP 886 . D 1499 . J 2690 - junction of Interstate 10 with Interstate 5 in Los Angeles | |||
| LA 217 . MP 217 . P 168 . EP 669 . D 1282 . J 2573 - California/Arizona border; westbound travelers must stop for agricultural inspection | |||
| LA 385 . MP 168 . P 0 . EP 501 . D 1114 . J 2305 - Phoenix, Arizona at junction with I-17 | |||
| LA 442 . MP 225 . P 57 . EP 444 . D 1057 . J 2248 - Tucson, Arizona at junction with I-19 | |||
| LA 886 . MP 4 . P 501 . EP 0 . D 613 . J 1804 - El Paso, Texas | |||
| LA 1499 . MP 617 . P 1114 . EP 613 . D 0 . NO 603 . M 771 . J 1191 - Dallas Texas | |||
| LA 1877 . MP 995 . D 378 . NO 225 . M 393 . J 813 - Louisiana/Texas border | |||
| LA 2102 . MP 225 . D 603 . NO 0 . M 168 . J 588 - New Orleans | |||
| LA 2270 . MP 26 . D 771 . NO 168 . M 0 . J 420 - Mobile, Alabama | |||
| LA 2334 . MP 49 . D 834 . NO 232 . M 64 . J 356 - Tallahassee, Florida | |||
| LA 2990 . MP 405 . D 1191 . NO 588 . M 292 . J 0 - Jacksonville, Florida, at junction with Interstate 95 | |||
| That's the general idea. Progressive distance from assorted key points along the route. Since mileposts are up in every state, an additional indicator (MP) could follow the first place on the highway to indicate which mile in that state the driver is at. Assorted other waypoints (like Mount Rushmore, the Alamo, etc.) would be shown as intermediate points. | |||
| ] 23:52, 10 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Well I'd like for it to be a driving guide, but I feel like this information might clutter the articles... the term "Milepost" is entirely coincidental and does not refer to the Alaska Highway publication... the routebox takes care of the mileposts anyway. It would be extremely time-consuming to put the information in there, and many people wouldn't need this. Thanks for your input, however. --] 00:06, September 11, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Major cities?? == | |||
| Some of the cities listed under major cities are hardly "major cities." For example, the ] page lists ] as a major city along its route. Chamberlain has a population of just over 2,000 people. I think there needs to be a standard for this, perhaps a major city is any city with at least a population of 100,000. --] 02:42, 16 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :We're talking about this over on the main template discussion page -- see ] --] 11:51, 16 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Copyright == | |||
| Can someone here confirm or deny that interestate highway signs are in the ]? ] 21:12, 24 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :The shields are created by the government, and the images are released into the public domain... I don't see any problems. --] 21:18, 24 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::That's what I thought. I just wanted a confirmation from people who probably knew better. Remember, if the signs were made by a contractor then sold tho the U.S., they wouldn't be public domain. P.S. That was me above logged out. ] | ] 23:12, 24 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I think they are because they were made by the US Federal government. --] 21:21, 24 September 2005 (UTC) (i began writing this before rschen posted) | |||
| ::The signs themselves are probably made by contractors... the images in all of the Interstate articles are made by Misplaced Pages users, usually ]. These are released into the public domain by the users themselves, who are the original copyright holders. Incidentally, that means you can use them outside of Misplaced Pages without attribution, although it's the nice thing to do. --] 01:32, 25 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::I know what public domain means. However, if the signs are made and designed by external contractors, that grants them copyright over the sign, (a creative work) automatically according to the ]. Even if they are transferring copyright to the government along with the sign, that doesn't make it PD. Copyrights that have been transferred to the US gov remain valid. However, if the US government invented the logo, then it is in PD. If someone takes a picture of a copyrighted work, however, the picture is a derivative work with the same copyright terms as the original. Hence, that wouldn't be enough to free up the copyright. So it makes a difference who invented the logo. ] | ] 08:38, 25 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::::What you say is true, but I think the shields were invented by a government employee, not a contractor. (I could easily be wrong here, though.) As for photographs, I'm pretty sure most of the signs here aren't photographs, although there are exceptions, and in those cases, the photographer is often also the uploader. (Example: ]) --] 17:34, 25 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Highway Photographs == | |||
| I can take high-resolution pictures of the H1, H2, H3 in Hawaii where I'm stationed in the military and any road going through Houston, my home town, especially I-45, which I even have pictures from Hurricane Rita. What criteria should I think about when taking pictures? Since highways are usually very long roads, it may be pretty far to drive to get to a major landmark on the road to include in the photograph. Is there anything additional I should think about or does anyone have any additional comments regarding this? | |||
| :Interesting or historically significant signs are good. Really anything out of the ordinary, I suppose. There are also some spots on some roads that just look good to the eye for some reason. Use your own judgement, I guess. It's really up to you. --] 21:29, 2 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm glad you asked this... I was thinking about it. I was thinking that pictures should include the road and be generally scenic -- too many Interstates in this part of the Midwest that look like two lanes, a median, and corn. If you want to start a "Requests for 'Copyrighted - Free Use' Pictures page", we can do that too. I'd personally add a better picture of the ] (for I-39) and a picture of the Baker Bridge in Peoria (for I-74) to the list. --] 03:19, 3 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Routebox and Shields == | |||
| I think the Routebox template would look better if the shields led the text. Scaling the shield images down to 20 px looks good, however the article for ] has them at 30 px. I've also tried them at 25 px, which may be a good compromise. I also like the layout for the Routebox currently used on the article for ]. | |||
| There should also be some attempt to standardize the appearance of Interstate shields in terms of size, color and font. From what I've seen so far, there seem to have been two main sources of Interstate shields: versions initially uploaded by ] in May of 2004, and the larger, darker versions uploaded by ] last month. Both sources claim the shields to be the work of the U.S. federal government. Many shields have been replaced with Kamlung uploads, but many Interstates are still using the Denelson83 uploads. I think the shields uploaded by Kamlung are of higher quality, more readable, and more aesthetically pleasing. His source should be identified, and the rest of the Interstate shields on Misplaced Pages should be updated with this model. -- ] 01:50, 5 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I never noticed the size of the shields, but you have a valid point. As far as the standardization, there is sometimes a reason why they aren't. Take ]. The whole thing is in Florida, so why not use the full shield, since it isn't showing partiality to any state. However, I was actually recently wondering how to go about making a shield for a 3di (they don't all have them)... PS: I never noticed a difference between the sheilds, with the exception of state names. --] 02:32, 5 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Because of the size concerns I'd use 20px... but yeah there's a lot of things nonstandard about the routeboxes, especially with Interstate 5. For example, should the mileposts say "Oklahoma 185" or "OK 185"? What is a major junction? Some routeboxes have no images for each individual junction as well. Hmm... --'''] (] - ] - )''' 01:31, 6 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::I was starting to write a standard on this before the routeboxes came up. I'm sticking with 20px (] ]) for 2dis and 25px (] ]) for 3dis on my pages. The goal is to have the numbers be the same size. That said, I also need someone to make PNG versions of Illinois state shields... my current source is pretty good but the 3dis aren't correctly sized. --] 14:21, 6 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::Out of curiosity (and so I can make some), what is your source? --] 23:16, 6 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::::This place: . Contains more about Illinois State Highways than you would ever have cared to know about, and still a good "original source" type website. --] 01:07, 7 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Helpful == | |||
| I found this site hlepful. | |||
| == elevations and grades on the nation's Interstate Highways == | |||
| There is a need, on this site, both for truckers and those of us who travel in recreation vehicles, for a linear chart which shows highway elevations (in feet) and grades (%) for the entire Interstate system. | |||
| :You mean for each individually? If you or anyone else wants to put all of that on here, it's fine with me, but I'm not going to. Though perhaps the maximum grade (I'm guessing there is one as part of the Interstate standard) should be listed in the ] article. Besides, wouldn't the maximum grade be fine for trucks? The Interstate highway system was designed to be fine for trucks; one of the purposes back in the 1950's or whenever was military. --] 00:40, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == USGS arial photos == | |||
| Are they public domain? --] 02:28, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Categories== | |||
| Should the categories called ] be renamed to ]? See ] for the why. --'''] (] - ])''' 02:51, 17 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:43, 23 January 2012
Redirect to:
Categories: