| Revision as of 13:26, 19 November 2005 editEngleman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,569 edits →the best interstate shield: rm - i found the mutcd official dimensions and everything in the SHS book← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:43, 23 January 2012 edit undoImzadi1979 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors151,547 editsm +categories | ||
| (748 intermediate revisions by 73 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| == Routebox and Shields == | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| I think the Routebox template would look better if the shields led the text. Scaling the shield images down to 20 px looks good, however the article for ] has them at 30 px. I've also tried them at 25 px, which may be a good compromise. I also like the layout for the Routebox currently used on the article for ]. | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| There should also be some attempt to standardize the appearance of Interstate shields in terms of size, color and font. From what I've seen so far, there seem to have been two main sources of Interstate shields: versions initially uploaded by ] in May of 2004, and the larger, darker versions uploaded by ] last month. Both sources claim the shields to be the work of the U.S. federal government. Many shields have been replaced with Kamlung uploads, but many Interstates are still using the Denelson83 uploads. I think the shields uploaded by Kamlung are of higher quality, more readable, and more aesthetically pleasing. His source should be identified, and the rest of the Interstate shields on Misplaced Pages should be updated with this model. -- ] 01:50, 5 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I never noticed the size of the shields, but you have a valid point. As far as the standardization, there is sometimes a reason why they aren't. Take ]. The whole thing is in Florida, so why not use the full shield, since it isn't showing partiality to any state. However, I was actually recently wondering how to go about making a shield for a 3di (they don't all have them)... PS: I never noticed a difference between the sheilds, with the exception of state names. --] 02:32, 5 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Because of the size concerns I'd use 20px... but yeah there's a lot of things nonstandard about the routeboxes, especially with Interstate 5. For example, should the mileposts say "Oklahoma 185" or "OK 185"? What is a major junction? Some routeboxes have no images for each individual junction as well. Hmm... --'''] (] - ] - )''' 01:31, 6 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::I was starting to write a standard on this before the routeboxes came up. I'm sticking with 20px (] ]) for 2dis and 25px (] ]) for 3dis on my pages. The goal is to have the numbers be the same size. That said, I also need someone to make PNG versions of Illinois state shields... my current source is pretty good but the 3dis aren't correctly sized. --] 14:21, 6 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::Out of curiosity (and so I can make some), what is your source? --] 23:16, 6 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::::This place: . Contains more about Illinois State Highways than you would ever have cared to know about, and still a good "original source" type website. --] 01:07, 7 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Helpful == | |||
| I found this site hlepful. | |||
| == elevations and grades on the nation's Interstate Highways == | |||
| There is a need, on this site, both for truckers and those of us who travel in recreation vehicles, for a linear chart which shows highway elevations (in feet) and grades (%) for the entire Interstate system. | |||
| :You mean for each individually? If you or anyone else wants to put all of that on here, it's fine with me, but I'm not going to. Though perhaps the maximum grade (I'm guessing there is one as part of the Interstate standard) should be listed in the ] article. Besides, wouldn't the maximum grade be fine for trucks? The Interstate highway system was designed to be fine for trucks; one of the purposes back in the 1950's or whenever was military. --] 00:40, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == USGS arial photos == | |||
| Are they public domain? --] 02:28, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Categories== | |||
| Should the categories called ] be renamed to ]? See ] for the why. --'''] (] - ])''' 02:51, 17 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :How about '''Californian members of the Interstate Highway System''' or something? That way, it could be capitalized without dispute. But it's a bit too long. I just read that thing. The whole thing seems so dumb. Does it really matter how it's capitalised? --] 05:56, 17 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well yes since ] is an interstate highway... it goes in between 2 states. However, it is not an Interstate. Also ] is not an interstate highway, but it is an Interstate Highway. But this is the most controversial thing I have ever done on Misplaced Pages. --'''] (] - ])''' 03:11, 18 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:43, 23 January 2012
Redirect to:
Categories: