| Revision as of 18:25, 26 January 2012 editEdwardsBot (talk | contribs)354,693 edits →The Signpost: 23 January 2012: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:25, 28 January 2012 edit undoNoetica (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,370 edits →Notice concerning an action at ArbCom: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 255: | Line 255: | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0224 --> | <!-- EdwardsBot 0224 --> | ||
| == Notice concerning an action at ArbCom == | |||
| A request has been filed for the Arbitration Committee to look at long-term issues with editing in the Article Titles and MOS areas at ]. I have added your name as a party, since it is clear that you have been involved at RMs, and at pages that are within the scope of the action. | |||
| Hoping for your comments, Joja. Best wishes! | |||
| <font color="blue"><big>N</big><small>oetica</small></font><sup><small>]</small></sup> 05:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:25, 28 January 2012
 Archives | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
TUSC token d73206ce5ea814e8bf250d064215ba6f
My toolserver user screening control (TUSC) ID is d73206ce5ea814e8bf250d064215ba6f.
Many minor edits in Solar inverter
{{Talkback|Surajt88#Many minor edits in Solar inverter}} Hello why are you deleting usefull information with the wrong view of marketing ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrikanthv (talk • contribs) 08:40, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
No response?
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:05, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Redirect to Ginsberg's theorem
Ginsberg's theorem (Joja)
Ginsberg's theorem (Dingo1729)
Please comment on Talk:Thermodynamic equilibrium
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Thermodynamic equilibrium. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 December 2011
- Recent research: Psychiatrists: Misplaced Pages better than Britannica; spell-checking Misplaced Pages; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data
- News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news
- WikiProject report: The Tree of Life
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales
- Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'
Caps: perhaps I've got it all wrong
Hi Joja, we went through the telecom resistance to downcasing in items such as named protocols. Well, OK, although I'm not entirely happy with that. We hav established that laws, theories, theorems, principles, rules, should be downcased. Am I wrong to assume that named indexes should be downcased? Many are already downcased on WP and in the open literature. I'd appreciate your advice on the arguments for and against in this respect. Tony (talk) 07:01, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Guild of Copy Editors 2011 Year-End Report
  We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2011. Read all about these in the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report.
On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. We look forward to your support in 2012! – Your 2011 Coordinators: Diannaa (lead), The Utahraptor, and Slon02 and SMasters (emeritus). |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:25, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Marketing mix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franchise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Ariel A. Roth
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ariel A. Roth. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 January 2012
- Interview: The Gardner interview
- News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III
- Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future
- Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators
Science of morality page capitalization issues?
I'm not sure what you mean. Maybe help me out and explain in that page's discussion? Thanks in advance -Tesseract(talk) 07:59, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Silent River Film Festival
Long unsourced lists are not encyclopedic, even if sourced. We are not the film festival's promotional website. Yworo (talk) 03:19, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- See 2011 Sundance Film Festival. Please discuss on SRFF article page. Jojalozzo 03:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Silent River Film Festival
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
A tag has been placed on Silent River Film Festival requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you can assert the importance of the subject, 
. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Misplaced Pages guidelines.
See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Yworo (talk) 03:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
January 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Silent River Film Festival. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You compared these additions to 2011 Sundance Film Festival. All the lists in that article have sources. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 14:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- You're so quick on the trigger with this article that I wasn't able to add sources (they exist!) before you deleted the content. Since you appear to be unwilling to locate or supply sources yourself, I suggest you back off for a bit while others work on this. I find it especially unseemly when proponents of speedy deletion remove content during discussion. Last, I suggest you use the article talk page for these discussions. Jojalozzo 15:01, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't remove any content until the speedy had been declined. Watch your accusations and don't make them until you have made sure they are true, I searched for sources on Google News, there was only one, and it was already used in the article. Yworo (talk) 15:22, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- My apologies. I didn't see that bit of timing. Though I still question deletion of content while proposing deletion of the article unless you felt it might give the article a better chance to survive the proposal. In any case, I agree that the list of all entries was not so useful and is better replaced with the list of awardees, so it's all moot now. Jojalozzo 16:22, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't remove any content until the speedy had been declined. Watch your accusations and don't make them until you have made sure they are true, I searched for sources on Google News, there was only one, and it was already used in the article. Yworo (talk) 15:22, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Indian rupee
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Indian rupee. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 January 2012
- Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold
- News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang
- WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz
- Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3
Gallery Added
(I'm copying this to Talk:Overpass#Gallery_Added let's continue the discussion there.)
Regarding the images on the article Overpass, the prior arrangement was somewhat unsightly due to the relatively small amount of text on the page and the large number of images. I left one image out of the gallery because, in my opinion, it was the image that is most descriptive of the concept of Overpass/flyover.
I did intend to move the image to the right side of the article, but I forgot to do that. I have just corrected that oversight.
In your note you mentioned that the images were, "moved ... to the railroad overpass section." I'm not sure what you mean. The article, and the gallery I added, is about both highway and railroad overpasses. What I did was create a gallery for all but one of the images to make the article flow better visually.
Finally, the policy I mentioned in my edit summary is Section 3.2 of Misplaced Pages Manual of Style/Images which talks about how to locate an image. But I was also influenced by Section 2 of Misplaced Pages:Picture tutorial, Avoiding stack-ups where we learn that stacking multiple images against large amounts of white space is visually undesirable. My edit was intended to fix that.
Finally if your interest is in railroad overpasses, I think the article would benefit from more railroad related images. If you have any that would be appropriate that would be great.
— Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) – 14 January 2025, 06:10 (UTC)
Violation of copyrights
Hello , You have violated the copyrights by editing the image without the permission from the owner, please revert back the images to original form. or face legal action. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrikanthv (talk • contribs) 09:09, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- Shrikanthv, you seem to have forgotten that the license granted for that image explicitly included the right to modify it, which is what Jojalozzo has done, removing branding to make the image more useful to the public. You have been blocked for making a legal threat here, and will not be unblocked until that threat is explicitly withdrawn. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:09, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 21:12, 12 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ronhjones 21:12, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Caps or no caps
I think overall capitalization makes but a trivial difference to encyclopedic content, but items such as Last Supper are generally caps. I think you should ask on talk pages before running a rename lawnmower all over the place. You seem to be renaming many many pages at will. This is overdosing on lower cases now. History2007 (talk) 18:07, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- I think capitalization confers meaning and when it's applied inconsistently then meaning is confused. Last supper is down=cased per WP:DOCTCAPS (by my interpretation). I hear you on the lawnmower analogy. Sometimes it's hard to hold back. Jojalozzo 18:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, so please discuss it at the Last Supper page to figure it out. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 18:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
See Misplaced Pages talk: WikiProject Christianity#Application of MOS guidelines on capitalization in articles on Christianity. Jojalozzo 19:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes indeed, you don't seem to have consensus there, & I will apply to have your premature renames reversed; they should have been discussed at each page first. You are misinterpreting the policy, which indeed could be clearer. Johnbod (talk) 02:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- An RfC should stay active for a few days before consensus can be determined. Please see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment#Ending RfCs. Jojalozzo 02:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- It can stay "open" as long as you like, but you should not be making changes based on the reverse of the way it is clearly going in the meantime. Jesus at Herod's court is ok I think, but the others may not be. The Last Supper is very clearly a proper noun phrase, just like Gunpowder Plot. Johnbod (talk) 02:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- An RfC should stay active for a few days before consensus can be determined. Please see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment#Ending RfCs. Jojalozzo 02:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes indeed, you don't seem to have consensus there, & I will apply to have your premature renames reversed; they should have been discussed at each page first. You are misinterpreting the policy, which indeed could be clearer. Johnbod (talk) 02:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2012
- Special report: English Misplaced Pages to go dark on January 18
- Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?
- News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Misplaced Pages turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer
- Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near
- Technology report: ArticleFeedback moves into new trial phase; and how MediaWiki integrates with Facebook, IPv6, and PostgreSQL explored
Please comment on Talk:List of countries by GDP (nominal)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of countries by GDP (nominal). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
AN notice
Notice of Administrators' Noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Unblock request on User:125.7.71.6". Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Confucius Institute
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Confucius Institute. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 January 2012
- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
Notice concerning an action at ArbCom
A request has been filed for the Arbitration Committee to look at long-term issues with editing in the Article Titles and MOS areas at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Article titles/MOS. I have added your name as a party, since it is clear that you have been involved at RMs, and at pages that are within the scope of the action.
Hoping for your comments, Joja. Best wishes!
Noetica 05:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC)