| Revision as of 10:50, 5 February 2012 editDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots668,626 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:00, 8 February 2012 edit undoF=q(E+v^B) (talk | contribs)4,289 edits →assertive reply from Dirac equation (section): new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:50, 5 February 2012 (UTC) | It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:50, 5 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == assertive reply from ] == | |||
| Please excuse this intrusion, but you've got it all wrong, Incnis Mrsi. I never become insulted, or look for credit becuase I'm so self-obsessed with my edits, or any of that crap. That is simply false. All I ask is ''feedback'' on my edits (whenever I appear to be "insulted"), becuase I '''really''' would like to know if people think they really are bad, and what '''''they prefer''''' instead. I really don't mind if others obliterate my edits in place of better content (else the point of WikiPedia is defeated). | |||
| Of course: anyone may assume what they assume, but thats the truth. It just becomes irritating when a statement like that is made without reason. --<span style="font-family:'Gill Sans MT'"> ](])</span> 20:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:00, 8 February 2012
License tagging for Image:Inkeri.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Inkeri.png. Misplaced Pages gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Misplaced Pages, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 14:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
About interwiki link in NAT
I removed pl:Noc from all interwikis article by my bot.--Alex S.H. Lin 04:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, the problem seems solved. I'll describe this type of interwiki errors in m:Interwiki conflicts. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Freenode Image
Thanks for the tips, I was going by the Freenode website and didn't notice the filename until i had finished uploading ;) Moniker42 (talk) 22:37, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Your input requested
Hi. A proposal on the re-creation of WP:RUSSIA is currently underway at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Russia/Proposal. One of the main points is that we should have workgroups covering different topics. We are trying to ascertain the interest of editors in various workgroups under WP:RUSSIA, such as history, politics, biographical, etc; as your userpage indicates you are Russian or live in Russia, perhaps you can take a read of the proposal, comment on it wherever you have thoughts, and perhaps provide details of any Russian topics you may be interested and are willing to collaborate with other editors on? Your input is valued. Cheers. --Russavia 20:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
IRCd Operator abuse
I noticed your note in the html of IRCd. The Operator abuse section is valid but could be written better and certainly needs references. There were quite a number of operators who were sanctioned on EFnet in the mid to late 1990s over that sort of behavior (I actually could name names of a number of those operators but that might not be a good idea on wiki). There should be archived emails of this stuff still around, possibly on the EFnet website somewhere. Google should turn up something. Another place to check for archived copies of this stuff would be Google Groups usenet archives. A good bit of IRC admin discussion still took place on usenet and other stuff discussed via email listserv was often reflected to the IRC-related usenet groups. Tothwolf (talk) 04:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Neptune's winds
I saw you made a change to the lead of the wind article. What is the source of your addition? It needs to be in the article below, using a cite nnnn reference, or someone could potentially send the article to FAR. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:12, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Nevermind. The information was already in the article below. When you work on an article for a few months, you can forget what you've thrown in there. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- There is a lot of references in Neptune#Climate about velocity of that winds. I am not sure that namely these two planets have “strongest winds”. Should we mention only Saturn, if winds on Neptune and, possibly, Jupiter are stronger? I have no objections to throwing the mention of planets away. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:28, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- No, we can't throw them out per the wind FAC comments, which forced their inclusion. What you did was fine. Thegreatdr (talk) 13:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Alcohol abuse
I see that you have moved 'USA College binge drinking' back to 'Alcohol abuse'.
I agree with you that 'Alcohol abuse' is a serious, international subject. The content of the article, however, does not describe the disease or its effects in the world. The content describes the problems of college students in the United States.
Could I suggest that you undo the move and start a new article 'Alcohol abuse' with content about the disease and its problems in the world? A stub would be valuable as a begining. Thanks! jmcw (talk) 10:06, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Answered here. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:09, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
MAKS 2009
Hello Incnis Mrsi!
I want to state one question to you: From August 19th until August 23rd the MAKS Airshow takes place again in Zhukovsky, near Moscow. Do you have the time to go there in order to take a lot of photos? Would be unique contribution for Wikimedia. I hope your response is positive. Greets, High Contrast (talk) 18:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Late reply about Gyrovector space
Late reply, I know, but I've replied to your questions at: Talk:Gyrovector space Charvest (talk) 18:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of USA College binge drinking
An article that you have been involved in editing, USA College binge drinking, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/USA College binge drinking. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Literaturegeek | T@1k? 13:21, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Your rollback request
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Misplaced Pages:New admin school/Rollback and Misplaced Pages:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Arbitrarily0 11:37, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- Said what? I will use rollback, of course, at least for some years. Thank you very much and don’t remove anything from my rights, please ☺ Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:43, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
2 ru interwikis at 1 page?
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_Wikipedias&curid=6050087&diff=348177056&oldid=347013010 I don't think that's correct. --Obersachse (talk) 10:14, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- Of course, I made it in a way which you don't like. You was welcomed to the discussion, but you recently declared something like “I want to eliminate links between different namespaces because such links usually lead to interwiki conflicts. But was fiercely attacked in en.wiki and now let him/them care about interwiki and incorrect links without me, as they are so smart”. OK, I am so smart and I fixing the problem in my openly planned way, which appears to face no objections. Please, try to present your arguments for interwiki purism again in that already established discussion. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- Your way (linking to more than one page of a language) causes interwikiconflicts. --Obersachse (talk) 15:46, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Re: Counter-vandalism
Hello and thanks for the reminder. I am well aware that I sometimes miss previous edits in a series of vandalism but most of the time I actually check the page history and then take the last good version to reset the article. Moreover, I think rollback is rather impractical because a) it needs to be applied for, b) any coded tool is only as practical as the code applied and c) not all edits by the same editor in a row are likely vandalism. So I prefer to use the "undo" button for single edits or just to restore an older version from scratch. De728631 (talk) 21:43, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 07:19, 10 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
╟─TreasuryTag►Lord Speaker─╢ 07:19, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer permission
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Misplaced Pages:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Inet-note-ref
Template:Inet-note-ref has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
ClueBot NG
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Time in Russia info.
My rationale is this: on March 27 this year, Russia will advance their clocks forward but it will not actually be daylight saving time, as they will be keeping "summer time" for the whole year. As a result, I reworded all mentions of daylight saving time, but, following March 27, I will advance the time offsets for all Russian time zones by an hour to reflect actual time usage. If you think this is presumptuous of me, then the reverts you have done are OK with me (except that the table for the tz database will need to be changed so that it is a bit more consistent), but I think that some sort of edit similar to what I have done should be performed after March 27 to prevent confusion. ZanderSchubert (talk) 10:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Existence of free protons in ordinary liquids
Here I mean "ordinary" as on Earth at STP, not in the cores of neutron stars. No, free protons do not exist in liquids, since they always attach themselves to the electron cloud in the nearest molecule/anion, which is always available. There may exist free "solvated electrons" in liquids (like sodium dissolving in liquid ammonia to give a nice color), but electrons have sqrt(1836) = 43 times longer wavelengths than do protons, at any energy. A proton at room temp has a wavelength of 2 angstroms or so, which is far too small for them to sit in a cage between negatively charged anions and not be able to make a choice of which way to go and which to sit on, like the proverbial donkey starving between piles of hay. Protons have no reason to delocalize at room temperature.
Yes, I know the article on superacids talks about free protons in liquids, but it gives no references, and frankly I don't believe it. Ab initio QM calculations show protons hopping from anion-to-anion in the strongest superacid known, just as they do in water, via the Grotthuss mechanism. See .
So, some editor who claims to know what he's talking about, has reverted me on this point. There's my cite and there's my reasoning. Now, what have YOU got? And by the way, I'm going to go add a to the statement in superacids. SBHarris 00:36, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
"... think about what you upload into Misplaced Pages!"
I used to leave comments like that until I learned that insult and arrogance interfere with editing. --Smokefoot (talk) 18:52, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Magnesium deficiency (agriculture)
Please, explain, what means this edit. It is highly implausible that a very experienced user is not familiar with well known things about page moves and maintaining edit histories. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:06, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- You may find it "highly implausable" that a highly experienced editor did not know there was a reason not to move a page by copy-and-paste, but this is the first I've heard of a need to preserve a sacrosanct edit history for copyright purposes. You'd think that with all the destruction of contested articles, that are eventually again started in another form or by another name (with no attribution to previous versions), and then kept, that somebody would have mentioned this potential alligator in the swamp. ;) Never have I seen a mention of it in the RfD wars. Nor did I know that non-admins can move a page using page-move. So, I learned two things. Next time, I'll do it correctly. Thanks for the lesson. SBHarris 18:11, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of PNG Stereo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PNG Stereo is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/PNG Stereo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Smjg (talk) 23:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Redirect suggestion
For a relatively new editor, you certainly had a bright idea on the MOS (linking) page about redirects rather than # direct links. I never even thought of that. Brilliant! And well-explained to boot. Keep up the good work! Student7 (talk) 22:17, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
- I am not a new editor. I contribute since 2005 and have over 12,000 Misplaced Pages edits in various languages. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:26, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry. (I call everybody "young fellow" when they are younger than me! You have 1/4 of my edits!). Still a good idea though. Student7 (talk) 19:03, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks for cleaning up the new RJ45 section in Registered jack Kvng (talk) 23:27, 9 September 2011 (UTC) |
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Incnis Mrsi/Archive 1! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
"name = equation"...
Cheers - I did try that when I created the account and started on wikipedia but it didn't work. I'm not sure if it really matters; the caret-wedge shape symbol ⋀ and the cross-times symbol × are both used for the vector product of two vectors, so its not completley unrecognizible. Thats whats in the formula - the vector product of velocity v and magnetic field B. The process of changing names seems lengthly and involved, somehow, and you need to see Bureaucrats and all that. I would rather just stick to the current name and continue to edit - but thanks again =) Happy New Year! -- F = q(E + v × B) 17:25, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Slash (punctuation)
- I was under the impression that you were going to change the discussion to merge? User's are allowed to merge articles themselves, an administrator's approval is not required. Gsingh (talk) 19:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Eidos RfC
Hello, there is an RfC concerning the Eidos page in which you have shown interest in the past. This is a small notification in case you may wish to take part in the discussion. Salvidrim! 20:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Grand National Tournament in Declamation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
slow tablet
Thank you for reverting my inadvertent change to the Talk page of Entailment. I was browsing on a slow tablet. --Ancheta Wis (talk) 09:46, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited P-adic number, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saturation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Intensive and extensive properties, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Relativistic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
assertive reply from Dirac equation (section)
Please excuse this intrusion, but you've got it all wrong, Incnis Mrsi. I never become insulted, or look for credit becuase I'm so self-obsessed with my edits, or any of that crap. That is simply false. All I ask is feedback on my edits (whenever I appear to be "insulted"), becuase I really would like to know if people think they really are bad, and what they prefer instead. I really don't mind if others obliterate my edits in place of better content (else the point of WikiPedia is defeated).
Of course: anyone may assume what they assume, but thats the truth. It just becomes irritating when a statement like that is made without reason. -- F = q(E + v × B) 20:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)