Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 07:56, 14 February 2012

Archives

1

Bubble Tea

Is Bubble Tea the same as Moroccan Tea? LOL Ashermadan (talk) 21:44, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nokia Champions League Twenty 20.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nokia Champions League Twenty 20.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Ra.One

I see you're still quite pre-occupied with the article (even though you hated it :D ). However, I think this problem with HereToSaveWiki is going out of bounds. He has the strong and undivided backing from a select group of editors (one of them being an administrator) who always patrol articles in an attempt to downgrade figures etc. This sort of backing has buoyed him on and he's getting that feeling of being unstoppable, so he'll do whatever he wishes knowing that there will always be that group to back him up in whatever he does, right or wrong. Its better to move on and leave him to his fantasies. Besides, that bit about being "highest-grossing film of 2011" isn't necessary anyway, and we could do with lesser details as the lead section is already too big, and there will have to be a separate paragraph added for a brief accolades summary before the FA review. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Its not really a matter of hate/love anymore; anyways, its become tiring exposing who is a fanboy and who isn't, so let's leave it there. I sure don't share your feelings on that admin, but let's leave it off. As for the FA, we shall have to first go for a Peer Review; believe me, that will be massive and hugely disrupted; be prepared for that troll HereToSaveWiki to completely overturn the review from a discussion about the article, to a discussion about how we are fanboys of SRK and that we are destroying the neutrality of Misplaced Pages, and manipulating it for our own uses (all of this makes for excellent entries in joke books, but are a major headache here). And also expect Scieberking to go all-out madly against Ra.One for anything and everything, and don't expect him not to turn away the PR off to some totally unrelated topic as well (much as he tried to do in that Bodyguard discussion). Believe me, he'll do everything possible to ensure Ra.One doesn't become an FA, and he'll get a whole load of support from his close gang of friends and trolls whom he nurtured; he's basically making it a game of numbers, and his friends are extending their wings through mails too. Ah. but we must get an FA for this, mainly because Indian film articles boast of very few FAs, and secondly to shut the mouths of all these people for some time. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 18:11, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Meryam90, I left a message on HereToSaveWiki's talk page asking them to calm down some, use the talk page more and a cautionary note about calling edits vandalism when they certainly don't meet the criteria in WP:VANDAL. I think you could have helped calm things down some by not responding in such an aggressive manner and pointing (or pushing) the editor to the talk page. If there's a previous discussion on the topic (especially one that's archived), posting a link to it on their talk page can help or leaving a note that it's been discussed before and that they should be able to find it by searching the talk page archives. Ravensfire (talk) 18:36, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Ravensfire but I have no desire to deal with him/her because I know well enough that he's simply trying to begin a dispute (judging from messages he has left on other users talk pages). I am actually pretty sure he's a sock for a certain user. hey Ankit, U didn't go through with the PSI for Seeta mayya or wut? --Meryam90 (talk) 18:44, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Understandable - I'm been there (and probably will be there in a few weeks on the various Tax Protestor articles. Just stay cool, don't let them get under your skin and use the WP:AN3 and WP:WQA if/when they cross the line. When you do things right and they don't, it's pretty simple for the admins there to figure out what to do. Hmmm, interesting thought about the sock. The HTSW account is very new, albiet with a comment about previously editing with an IP. Might be enough for an SPI based on similar topics and tone. If they've repeated any edits from the previous editor, that's easily enough to file an SPI. Remember it's not WP:PIXIEDUST though. There are always ways around the system. Ravensfire (talk) 20:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Now we have a very serious problem, as Scieberking has clearly called back his favorite troll Seeta mayya back into business; and I can't believe that she's back to her former antics without even a shred of change. Notice her rants on the Bodyguard discussion, and you'll see what I mean. Best thing, ignore her. She has so clearly not understood the discussion that I feel like an idiot for even thinking of reasoning with her. And LOL, she wants a higher figure for Bodyguard put up no matter what the cost; and then she says that she is a "fairly neutral and unbiased editor" HA HA HA HA LMAO ROTFL! Talk about SRK hatred. That too stupidly covered-up SRK hatred, exactly like what Scieberking shows. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 06:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Alright, this is more than enough, Ankitbhatt. You keep bringing my name and acussing me for no good reason, when, in this particular case, I've in fact asked Seeta Mayya to be civil. And whatever your reply will be, I won't respond here. I just want you to quit accusing me on various talk page spaces, and if you've got any issues, report me directly to WP:ANI. Thanks. Scieberking (talk) 06:37, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Now the nicest of nice things is happening: HereToSaveWiki and Seeta mayya are joing hands to expand their trolling activities all over Misplaced Pages. Meryam, be prepared for some seriously irritating problems in whichever SRK article you go. And yes, the troll SM has called both of us "trolls and vandals", actually the biggest "trolls and vandals" on Misplaced Pages. Perfect example of extreme irony. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 07:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

LOL

I am here to help and edit at wiki again :D Hope you've become a sensible lady since i had gone. Seeta Mayya Ji (talk) 04:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)