| Revision as of 12:42, 26 February 2012 editDangerousPanda (talk | contribs)38,827 edits →Requesting an unblock on Edgeform's behalf: nice wording← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:22, 26 February 2012 edit undoCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 edits unblock request declinedNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| Woops, sorry. Thanks anyway, and I do understand. --] (]) 00:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | Woops, sorry. Thanks anyway, and I do understand. --] (]) 00:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
| {{unblock | 1= I am not a sock puppet of any of the editors working on this page. I am not a sock puppet of anyone connected to any of the disruptive edits on this page or on other entries related to this page. I believe that the editors working on this page have improved the page and that my contributions are constructive and within wiki guidelines. I appreciate the efforts of Tryptofish and HelloAnyong to protect the entries. There is confusion being deliberately created by someone but not by me.] (]) 20:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Edgeform}} | {{unblock reviewed | 1= I am not a sock puppet of any of the editors working on this page. I am not a sock puppet of anyone connected to any of the disruptive edits on this page or on other entries related to this page. I believe that the editors working on this page have improved the page and that my contributions are constructive and within wiki guidelines. I appreciate the efforts of Tryptofish and HelloAnyong to protect the entries. There is confusion being deliberately created by someone but not by me.] (]) 20:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Edgeform| decline= Having looked at the SPI report and listened to the points made by the blocking admin and by other sysops , I'm declining this request as I see no substantive reason (in policy or in the SPI evidence) to overturn the block--] <sup>]</sup> 15:22, 26 February 2012 (UTC)}} | ||
| *The reviewing administrator may want to be aware of the discussion at ]. --] (]) 23:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | *The reviewing administrator may want to be aware of the discussion at ]. --] (]) 23:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:22, 26 February 2012
Hi Edgeform - we seem to editing the same article. I didn't understand the removal of the information on the Origin of Minds book. I undid the changes but perhaps we should discuss on page's discussion page? Wagonlease (talk) 02:00, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Allman reference on Bingham page
Could you specify a reference for Roger Bingham's interest in John Allman's work? Also I am adding a section to the page's Talk to discuss that paragraph. Caromk (talk) 01:35, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Sock puppet investigation
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Misplaced Pages accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Neurorel. Thank you. Edhubbard (talk) 03:15, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Requesting an unblock on Edgeform's behalf
Edgeform (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am posting here, on Edgeform's behalf, to request that the block be lifted. I believe that the block on the basis of an SPI was made in error, and I never want to see a good faith user wrongly blocked. Please see Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive232#Requesting reappraisal of a block for a discussion of the issues. Please feel free to contact me at User talk:Tryptofish if you have any questions about any of this. Thanks. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:51, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unblock requests must come from the user themself. Not trying to be bureaucratic, but they aren't WP:GAB compliant (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:19, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Woops, sorry. Thanks anyway, and I do understand. --Tryptofish (talk) 00:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Edgeform (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not a sock puppet of any of the editors working on this page. I am not a sock puppet of anyone connected to any of the disruptive edits on this page or on other entries related to this page. I believe that the editors working on this page have improved the page and that my contributions are constructive and within wiki guidelines. I appreciate the efforts of Tryptofish and HelloAnyong to protect the entries. There is confusion being deliberately created by someone but not by me.Edgeform (talk) 20:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Edgeform
Decline reason:
Having looked at the SPI report and listened to the points made by the blocking admin and by other sysops here, I'm declining this request as I see no substantive reason (in policy or in the SPI evidence) to overturn the block--Cailil 15:22, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- The reviewing administrator may want to be aware of the discussion at WP:AN#Requesting an unblock on another user's behalf. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- The words are chosen carefully - and effectively admit that they are a sockpuppet, just not related to the specific words chosen. You are, of course, aware that you may not WP:SOCK, right? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:42, 26 February 2012 (UTC)