Misplaced Pages

Talk:Whisper of the Heart: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:13, 2 March 2012 editSjones23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers101,811 edits Article issues: rewrite← Previous edit Revision as of 20:16, 2 March 2012 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by 92.148.172.89 - "Image wrong: "Next edit →
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:


The image associated with this page is the wrong image. That image is off howls moving castle, not whisper of the heart. If I can find a cc image, I'll change it. In the meantime if anyone else does ... (or I forget :-)) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:07, 10 June 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> The image associated with this page is the wrong image. That image is off howls moving castle, not whisper of the heart. If I can find a cc image, I'll change it. In the meantime if anyone else does ... (or I forget :-)) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:07, 10 June 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

You must be serious ... you deleted the comment explaining that this comment is wrong?

If no-one objects I'll delete this section, as it is completely pointless. The image is, of course, from WOTH !!

the image shown is exactly from _Whisper of the Heart_ Indeed, it is probably the single most famous image from Whisper of the Heart -- it is the first "Inoue fantasy scene" featuring the Baron, with Shizuku wearing her Victorian "fairy tale" costume. It is a direct shot from the movie "Whisper of the Heart" at 1:13:34 on either the DVD or BluRay. In the English version, the matching line of dialog from The Baron (actor Cary Elwes) is "That's it, we're riding the air currents..." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.213.186.154 (talk) 07:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) </span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Article issues == == Article issues ==
Line 20: Line 26:


As I do not want to edit war here, I am taking the ] route to see if anyone can voice their opinions on the matter. Thanks, ] ] (] - ]) 18:18, 2 March 2012 (UTC) As I do not want to edit war here, I am taking the ] route to see if anyone can voice their opinions on the matter. Thanks, ] ] (] - ]) 18:18, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, what do you mean by "IP Hopper". Are you just trying to be rude? Why? Yes or no - is one allowed to be anonymous on Misplaced Pages? the answer is of course "Yes". If so, what's your actual name instead of just an internet nickname?

It's worth noting that a number of points in the description were totally incorrect and completely unsourced "urban myths" in the earlier article (such as the total nonsense about "Disney requiring a different ending" and so on) - anyone who has seen the film would realise it was just wrong.

You insist that "yourself and Edward" strongly disagree with this. But you have not changed it back to the earlier, incorrect information.

Another good example is the section titled "Sequel". You can simply look up what "Sequel" means in the dictionary. It has nothing to do with a "sequel". It is a "spin-off" or some sort of related movie.

Can you simply STATE something that I "claimed was wrong" that was not in fact wrong? That is a very very straightforward question.

Can you STATE one issue that you and Edward "strongly disagree" with?

Are you able to do that>

You seem to have a panic about the fact that I had to "SHOUT" in caps a few times to get some attention from "Edward". the problem was, Edward was simply reverting anything else anyone would do.

Do you understand that that sort of behavior is not really the right approach on Wiki?

It's worth noting that you have now completely rewritten the description, for no reason. Your writing style is choppy, not very smooth (just one oerson's opinion of course) - the previous version which built up over time was really quite good. But the point is you've simply swapped one totally acceptable description article, for another one written by yourself - with no real discernible reason or difference.

Are "yourself and Edward" desperate for "ownership" of this page? Or? Is it a common problem on wikipedia that you get fans who really "want ownership" of a particular page?

It all seems a bit strange.

Anyway, I am standing by, all ears, ready for you to STATE one specific issue that you and Edward "strongly disagree" with???

signed, Anonymous <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:13, 2 March 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 20:16, 2 March 2012

WikiProject iconFilm: Japanese Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force.
WikiProject iconAnime and manga Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAnimation Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Error: Target page was not specified with to.

Image wrong

The image associated with this page is the wrong image. That image is off howls moving castle, not whisper of the heart. If I can find a cc image, I'll change it. In the meantime if anyone else does ... (or I forget :-)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by SmallBiscuit (talkcontribs) 23:07, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

You must be serious ... you deleted the comment explaining that this comment is wrong?

If no-one objects I'll delete this section, as it is completely pointless. The image is, of course, from WOTH !!

the image shown is exactly from _Whisper of the Heart_ Indeed, it is probably the single most famous image from Whisper of the Heart -- it is the first "Inoue fantasy scene" featuring the Baron, with Shizuku wearing her Victorian "fairy tale" costume. It is a direct shot from the movie "Whisper of the Heart" at 1:13:34 on either the DVD or BluRay. In the English version, the matching line of dialog from The Baron (actor Cary Elwes) is "That's it, we're riding the air currents..." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.213.186.154 (talk) 07:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.148.172.89 (talk)

Article issues

All right. There are some serious issues going on here in the article:

  • 1. The article needs sourcing from various reliable websites, books and reviews.
  • 2. An IP hopper from France has insisted that the edits he/she has done are correct. However, I and Edward321 (talk · contribs), strongly disagree with this. These include seemingly disruption of the talk page to illustrate a point, using all-caps in the edit summaries (which are incivil), and clearly violating the neutral point of view policy by adding personal interpretations of the characters.

As I do not want to edit war here, I am taking the WP:BRD route to see if anyone can voice their opinions on the matter. Thanks, Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 18:18, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, what do you mean by "IP Hopper". Are you just trying to be rude? Why? Yes or no - is one allowed to be anonymous on Misplaced Pages? the answer is of course "Yes". If so, what's your actual name instead of just an internet nickname?

It's worth noting that a number of points in the description were totally incorrect and completely unsourced "urban myths" in the earlier article (such as the total nonsense about "Disney requiring a different ending" and so on) - anyone who has seen the film would realise it was just wrong.

You insist that "yourself and Edward" strongly disagree with this. But you have not changed it back to the earlier, incorrect information.

Another good example is the section titled "Sequel". You can simply look up what "Sequel" means in the dictionary. It has nothing to do with a "sequel". It is a "spin-off" or some sort of related movie.

Can you simply STATE something that I "claimed was wrong" that was not in fact wrong? That is a very very straightforward question.

Can you STATE one issue that you and Edward "strongly disagree" with?

Are you able to do that>

You seem to have a panic about the fact that I had to "SHOUT" in caps a few times to get some attention from "Edward". the problem was, Edward was simply reverting anything else anyone would do.

Do you understand that that sort of behavior is not really the right approach on Wiki?

It's worth noting that you have now completely rewritten the description, for no reason. Your writing style is choppy, not very smooth (just one oerson's opinion of course) - the previous version which built up over time was really quite good. But the point is you've simply swapped one totally acceptable description article, for another one written by yourself - with no real discernible reason or difference.

Are "yourself and Edward" desperate for "ownership" of this page? Or? Is it a common problem on wikipedia that you get fans who really "want ownership" of a particular page?

It all seems a bit strange.

Anyway, I am standing by, all ears, ready for you to STATE one specific issue that you and Edward "strongly disagree" with???

signed, Anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.148.172.89 (talk) 20:13, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Categories: