Misplaced Pages

Template:Unreferenced: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:03, 12 April 2006 view sourceFabartus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,651 editsm rv after purusing talk -- this thing needs an RFC voted by a large community as it really junks up wikiP! ~~~← Previous edit Revision as of 17:06, 12 April 2006 view source Fabartus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,651 edits Explicitfy conflict between approved guideline and the proliferation of this reference, Emphasize generaly approved locations w/dichotomy~~~Next edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
---- ----
* This template will categorise tagged articles into ]. * This template will categorise tagged articles into ].
* This ] is a ]. * This ] is a ]], and as such should be placed on '''Talk Pages''' per the '''guideline''' on ''No self-references'' within wikipedia. (Please note the debate failed consensus on ], and peruse carefully before using).
* This template is not useful for ]. * This template is not useful for ].
* There is currently no consensus about where to place this template; most suggest either the bottom of the article page (in an empty 'References' section), or on the article's talk page. * There is currently no consensus about where to place this template (Re: Talk debates); most agree either the bottom of the article page (in an empty 'References' section), or on the article's talk page.
**In conjuction with the dicotomy with the guideline ]] and the vote on this talk, occurences in the heading of articles should be relocated immediately to one of those two places.
* This template should not be used with ]. * This template should not be used with ].
* If the external links section includes a references section, this template should not be used. * If the ''external links section includes a references section'', this template '''should not be used'''.
<!--See Vote on Talk page--> <!--See Vote on Talk page-->


Revision as of 17:06, 12 April 2006

This article or section does not cite its references or sources.
You can help Misplaced Pages by introducing appropriate citations.
  • This template will categorise tagged articles into Category:Articles lacking sources.
  • This template is a self-reference], and as such should be placed on Talk Pages per the guideline on No self-references within wikipedia. (Please note the debate failed consensus on Template talk:Unreferenced, and peruse carefully before using).
  • This template is not useful for Misplaced Pages:Subst.
  • There is currently no consensus about where to place this template (Re: Talk debates); most agree either the bottom of the article page (in an empty 'References' section), or on the article's talk page.
    • In conjuction with the dicotomy with the guideline Misplaced Pages:Avoid self-references] and the vote on this talk, occurences in the heading of articles should be relocated immediately to one of those two places.
  • This template should not be used with stubs.
  • If the external links section includes a references section, this template should not be used.

See also


Category: