Misplaced Pages

User talk:AgadaUrbanit: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:49, 2 March 2012 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,376,182 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:AgadaUrbanit/Archives/2012/February. (BOT)← Previous edit Revision as of 23:40, 18 March 2012 edit undoTheSoundAndTheFury (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,994 edits →Hi: new sectionNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
|box-advert=yes |box-advert=yes
}} }}

== Hi ==

Hi Agada. I think sometimes that in editing or discussing things, if something does not go the way one wished or thought it should, it might be annoying. Especially, if you think something should be done one way, and others disagree, then it might also be annoying. I think it's not fair to then, because of one's personal frustration, respond by disadvantaging other users of the encyclopedia. By putting the tags you did on the page, you are effectively discounting a vast amount of work over a long period of time by many people to any potential reader, and I don't think that is fair to either the reader or to the people who worked on the content. I think that if you had engaged in much discussion and substantive issues could not be resolved, that would be a totally reasonable way to handle it: signal to the public that something ain't right. But I strongly disagree with using this method to get back at someone. Please consider the time of other people that you are using when you do these things. I don't think it's very fair. Anyway, please be aware that there are dispute resolution remedies if you continue to disrupt the page. Thanks. And sorry about this. ] (]) 23:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:40, 18 March 2012


Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Hi

Hi Agada. I think sometimes that in editing or discussing things, if something does not go the way one wished or thought it should, it might be annoying. Especially, if you think something should be done one way, and others disagree, then it might also be annoying. I think it's not fair to then, because of one's personal frustration, respond by disadvantaging other users of the encyclopedia. By putting the tags you did on the page, you are effectively discounting a vast amount of work over a long period of time by many people to any potential reader, and I don't think that is fair to either the reader or to the people who worked on the content. I think that if you had engaged in much discussion and substantive issues could not be resolved, that would be a totally reasonable way to handle it: signal to the public that something ain't right. But I strongly disagree with using this method to get back at someone. Please consider the time of other people that you are using when you do these things. I don't think it's very fair. Anyway, please be aware that there are dispute resolution remedies if you continue to disrupt the page. Thanks. And sorry about this. The Sound and the Fury (talk) 23:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)