Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:48, 21 March 2012

Messages

You can leave messages for me in this section. Hghyux (talk) 18:04, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Dirk Lankenau: Abiogenesis March 2012 (2)

Dear Hghyux: thank you for your note, advise and the good interpretation on the Abiogenesis talk page. Your comment: There is a fine line between having knowledge vs. a conflict of interest. It is most certainly not vandalism because it seems to be done in good faith. You don't need to go to the talk page to edit if you don't feel it's neccesary. My guess is he saw the article, put his stuff in, and thought he improved the article. is highly appreciated and it reflects exactly my intent. I will be in contact with Armen Mulkidjanian and coordinate further procedure. Response times will not be as fast as by e-mail or Facebook-Twitter etc as we have other things to do as well. Thus, thank you again for assist - with best regards, Dirk Lankenau--Lankenau (talk) 18:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Dirk Lankenau: Abiogenesis March 2012

concerning your note 14:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC) under http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Lankenau on "abiogensis"

Dear Hghyux - editing and constructive comments by Wiki-editors are always appreciated. However, just deleting a published and world-wide well recognized issue (i.e. Zn-world theory and colaterally published material including the references of peer reviewed journals and books) without talking to us as responsible Wiki-editors (i.e. Prof. Armen Mulkidjanian and me)is, in our eyes, an act of vandalism. Prof. Mulkidjanian is a highly respected specialist on the scientific issues of the Zn-world and everything added to the Misplaced Pages site was published in peer reviewed journals and books. Only published material was included in the entry to the Misplaced Pages article (please, check it out...) and the references were cited. I am the editor in chief of the Springer book series Genome Dynamics and Stability. A recent book co-edited by Prof. Mulkidjanian and me is entitled "Origins of Life: The Primal Self Organization". The book was peer-reviewed as well, with each article reviewed by at least three specialists. Prof. Mulkidjanian and I are working on an additional book related to the issue. In this context we discussed, how to improve the Wiki-abiogenesis article in order to update and make it a generally more usefull information for Misplaced Pages. We respectfully do not intend any harm to the Wiki-article and we were carefull in re-assembling the paragraphs and put them in less conflicting order (not yet sent to Wiki as we had to probe Wiki first). Not much is intended to be deleted.

We came to the following conclusion: Apparently, numerous hypotheses on the origin of life can be separated into two groups, namely 1. the models that suggest experimental testing and that are, actually, experimentally tested, and 2. the models that either do not suggest any experimental testing or which suggest such testing but have been never tested from some reasons. The first group of models we suggest to gather under the title "Current models" whereas the second, large group of models would go under the title "Other models". We think that the criterium of testability is scientifically reasonale and fair; it should be explicitely and clearly introduced into the text of the article. In addition, it might be useful to mention results of experimental tests in each relevant case. References would be added. The models of Wächtershauser and Russell, as well as the Zn world model, are currently under experimental testing; since each of these models captures some facets of real biogeochemistry, some positive results have been reported in each case. In fact, not all scientifically testable scenarios are mentioned in Misplaced Pages. For example there is a new and very promising "Formamide World" concept of Saladino and Di Mauro that is not even mentioned in the Misplaced Pages article. We would be willing to write a respective section. Another section on top-down (anthropic principle) and bottom-up approaches would be added as well.

For doing all this, we would not be willing to fight deletions again of the sort encountered this morning. However, we may need some time and are not ready to engage in any shadow-boxing type discussions. Otherwise we may drop out instantly. Technical assistence from your side would be highly appreciated, as we are not well self-trained Wikipedians.

with best regards, Dirk Lankenau — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lankenau (talk • contribs) 21:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Christopher Meneses

Hi Hghyux, I hope you don't mind, but I've removed your speedy deletion tag from Christopher Meneses. According to the article this chap has played four times for his country, and that makes him notable enough for a Misplaced Pages article. ϢereSpielChequers 00:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Nope I don't mind. Sorry for causing confusion. Hghyux (talk) 00:19, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Scott Heirs

Hey, why don't you create a page about me then. Scott Hiers. (Bogart57 (talk) 00:59, 21 February 2012 (UTC))

I left a message on your page explaining why you can't do that. Hghyux (talk) 01:03, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you know that WP:AUTOBIO (within it WP:YOURSELF) also exist. ~Feedintm 01:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Why?

Why did you contest my page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by STATiKC (talk • contribs) 22:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

It doesn't comply with WP:NOTABILITY Hghyux (talk) 01:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

The Mime Set

This is a first time article ... still gathering citations etc ... is there away to take the page off into a saved mode whilst this is worked on so that it does not show up and therefor does not get preemptively deleted?

I am currently undertaking to chronicle groups that existed in the Australian music scene that had significant bodies of work however their contributions have been lost in being out of press and disbanded etc

I appreciate you patience in this matter — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmchron (talk • contribs) 01:12, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Use the {{new page}} tag to prevent this.. Hghyux (talk) 01:15, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Calm down...

...at AIV. I'll even watch him until someone takes care of him. Calabe1992 02:20, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

And he just got blocked anyway. Calabe1992 02:21, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Ok. Sorry, if that was too intense. Hghyux (talk) 02:22, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Not at all, it's just that it won't help admins find it any faster. Calabe1992 02:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

CSD G1

is meant solely for gibberish and incomprehensible text; which this was not. Please read and understand Misplaced Pages:CSD#G1 before making further speedy deletion requests under that criterion. Thank you for patrolling new pages, by the way. CharlieEchoTango (contact) 04:11, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Just dropping in...I left this user a note about this before, but xe removed it. Although this user's work as a new page patroller is appreciated, explaining G1 again is not worth it IMHO. --Bmusician 04:17, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

I am by no means trying to cause harm. I am just trying to help out. I make mistakes sometimes, and have read the rules. I removed your earlier notice because I did not feel it needed to stay. If you wish for me to restore it, then by all means I will. Most of the pages I tag end up getting deleted. Those that don't I apologize for the inconvenience. I joined about a month ago and am still trying to familiarize myself with everything. I will do my very best in the future to appropriate taggings. Hghyux (talk) 13:55, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Teremoana Atai

Hello Hghyux, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Teremoana Atai, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not nonsense - there is meaningful content. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Bmusician 04:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

There was absolutely no significant content on that page, and it did end up getting deleted. Hghyux (talk) 13:49, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

iContro

Hi hghyux,

I created an article based on an ERP solution that is well established in Malaysia. I did not do it for advertisement purposes but to educate people especially ERP users locally and globally about key factors in deciding to purchase an ERP solution for their respective businesses.

I should have created a draft before saving it to wiki but i'm new so i didnt know the rules...

Hope u can remove the tag so that I can re-create the article together with references...

Thank you

Planetsoft95 (talk) 07:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, but "educating others wanting to purchase your product." is just another form of advertising in my opinion. Hghyux (talk) 17:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Could you hold off on something for me?

This edit is a subject of some concern and I've been asked to look into it. This may be an issue of someone's personal safety, so please hold off on it for now.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 14:56, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Oh my gosh! I had no idea! I will stay very far away from there Hghyux (talk) 18:29, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm actually kind of worried I hope I didn't do anything too harmful. Hghyux (talk) 19:21, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

No, you're good. Don't worry. Thanks for chilling. It may end up going back in, but there is some doubt about the sourcing, etc.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 23:31, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Whew. Thanks. I will be sure to stay away. Hghyux (talk) 13:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Article piracy

Blatantly copy/pasting a userspace draft which was rejected at AFC, adding a few extra lines, posting it to mainspace AFTER it was rejected at AfC and not notifying the user who created the draft about any of this so that they can find out when the pirated mainspace article comes up for deletion is a VERY BAD thing! If you do that again you could find yourself blocked VERY quickly! Barts1a / What did I actually do right? / What did I do wrong this time? 22:46, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

I DID notify you before it got rejected. Look at your talkpage. Hghyux (talk) 19:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Your reports to AIV declined

Thank you for making a report on Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Misplaced Pages and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editors you reported may not have engaged in sufficient recent vandalism, or the users had not been sufficiently or appropriately warned. If they continue to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. EyeSerene 09:01, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

I would like to offer an apology

I'm sorry I got a bit hot under the collar with your copy/paste move. As I am sure you are aware the discussion on ANI that was moved to my talk page has confirmed that the Creative Commons license means that AS LONG AS ATTRIBUTION IS PROVIDED to the original source you are free to do as you please. Please note that copy/paste moves do not provide attribution as the history is not retained. As such unless you provide proper attribution using the {{copied}} template on the talk page the moved article is in violation of the original author's copyright. Repeated copy/paste moves without attribution usually result in you being blocked. If you want to move a page in the future please use the move function to avoid violating someone's copyright. That being said if an article is under AfC review it generally should NOT be moved until the review is completed with a positive outcome. Barts1a / What did I actually do right? / What did I do wrong this time? 22:58, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

THANK YOU! As a thanks for your apology, I will nominate the page for speedy deletion. Thanks again. Hghyux (talk) 23:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Once a page is being discussed at AfD it cannot be speedied. Plus as I am the original author {{db-self}} is invalid. Sorry but that's how things work here. Barts1a / What did I actually do right? / What did I do wrong this time? 23:18, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh ok. Sorry I was trying to be nice. I guess the best I can do is say that I accept your apology. And give out my own apology for everything I did. Hghyux (talk) 23:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Your apology has also been accepted. Barts1a / What did I actually do right? / What did I do wrong this time? 23:26, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Let's just move on from now. I think both of us learned something from this... Hghyux (talk) 23:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Hghyux, it is also permissible to provide a note in the edit summary to credit the original source of the text. For future reference the preferred method is to use the "Move" function. Please see WP:MOVE for an explanation on how to do this. As a side note, an article like that will almost never survive the deletion process; it will be rendered useless by the article on the actual item. If there were people regularly cleaning out WP:AFC that particular submission would have been declined per WP:N. N419BH 06:56, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Yup, I heard. I watched the conversation go down, but thanks for letting me know :) Hghyux (talk) 21:47, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Yikes, it looks like you caused quite a stir here, didn't you! I hope you realise that it's not always like this. If you've ever got any questions in the future, feel free to pop over to my page, I've got quite a lot of knowledge and a few friendly talk page stalkers, so may well be able to help out. Worm · (talk) 08:27, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

OK Hghyux (talk) 00:45, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Responding to User:123o's help

Greetings Hghyux, Sorry to bring this to your attention, but I noticed this via the help desk, and have left a reply as the user is actually talking about me. I have provided factual diff evidence to show who is the real victim and who is the actual attacker in all of this. I fear that the user may now be trying to pull the wool over people's eyes to cover themselves up from their web of lies. Sincere regards Wesley☀Mouse 23:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Alright. I hate when people do stuff like that. He was obviously the one in the wrong and I will fully support you. Hghyux (talk) 16:33, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

ANI report on User:123o

Hello Hghyux. I write to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an involving 123o (talk · contribs); in which I classified yourself as a witness. Wesley☀Mouse 02:31, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Dear god. Second time in less than a week. Hghyux (talk) 18:51, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Don't worry Hghyux, you just stumbled into something there as a "witness", you're fine ;) Worm · (talk) 14:07, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

But how does trying to help someone tie me in with another incident that I must participate in to help out? The way that user wrote that out was misleading and my response was me trying to help report a possible attacker. Not to be shocked and find out that the user was being misleading and then the other user gets mad and brings me into another WP:ANI investigation. I find that very sad. I am very much willing to help out in such situation, but it comes not less than a week after another incident. It is very tireing. Hghyux (talk) 20:35, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Sincere apologies for that dear Hghyux. At the time, I added names of users who had been involved, or caught up in the cross-fire, and where technically witnesses to the whole ordeal. Sorry if that scared you. However, I have now offered an olive branch to user123o, in a bid that we are both able to put our cross-worded differences behind us, and work unilaterally and in peace. Fingers-crossed he accepts the peace offering, and apologies in return for calling me illiterate. Wesley☀Mouse 23:24, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

I don't blame you one bit. The only reason I'm so upset is because I was in another ANI not less than a few days ago. I fully support your decision and I would have done the same. I was very happy to be a witness on your behalf because it really made me explode when I found out it was a dispute that I was now part of (again!) So I accept your apology, but it was not neccesary. Hghyux (talk) 23:29, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

So sorry to hear that you've been involved with ANI's twice in a few days. Don't let that discourage you from wanting to help others; it is always nice to see a helping user on here - hmm from this day fourth, I shall refer to you as the Wiki-Angel. I did find it strange though that some users noticed the provocations, while others couldn't; even when the user himself admitted to provocation - but that is now water under the bridge, and time has come to move forward and learn a lesson from all this. I need to learn how to read LOL. Wesley☀Mouse 23:45, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Cookie!

Everyone has good days and bad days, and some people only have good days when they make others have a bad day. Try and ignore the troublemakers or just outsmart them. Have a cookie! Jenova20 15:45, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Bonemarketing Warning

I would like to request a review on my last edit. I added a support group website, it was not a 12 step website like the listings just below it so I added a new section rather than adding it to the 12 step website list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonemarketing (talk • contribs) 16:50, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

I've fulfilled your request. If they find me to be right you may be blocked. I've reported your username and put you on a spam list. You've got lots of eyes on you. Hghyux (talk) 23:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thank you for being an excellent Wiki-Angel, keep up the good work in helping other Wikipedians. Wesley☀Mouse 23:48, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I am now going to create a barnstar page cause this is my first! Hghyux (talk) 23:51, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Receiving the first is exciting indeed. May I suggest the barnometer for storing awards!? I have one on my user page, and it does look kinda neat too. Wesley☀Mouse 00:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

I put them on a subpage so I don't need a barnometer. Thanks though. Hghyux (talk) 00:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Anti-vandal work

Hi Hghyux! It is great to see that your doing anti-vandal work - it is difficult to keep on top of the problem, so having people like you around to help out is terrific. However, it seems you may have been a tad over-zealous in your warnings. As a general rule, it is best to start from a level one warning and work up, as it has to be something extremely serious before we jump to a final warning for a first offence. There's always a chance that a simpler warning will turn an editor into one of the good guys, or that they always were editing in good faith but just made an error. Similarly, once someone has been warned for a mistake, we don't need to warn them again unless they make it a second time. With User:Bonemarketing, the user had only made one edit, for which they were warned by Secretlondon. You then warned them three more times for the same edit, including a final warning - the first was sufficient, and it feels bitey to have done so more than once. Unfortunately, the same happened in a couple of other cases - it is great that you wish to warn users, but it is worth checking to see if they've already been warned first. - Bilby (talk) 03:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Alright. Comments like these will only make me better in the future. So thanks for the tip. Hghyux (talk) 03:30, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppet Case

I believe that user:TheREALCableGuy is back using a new IP to circumvent a block. I have been editing the NOLA TV wiki pages for consistency lately and suddenly this new user:152.43.1.244 is foolishly editing (vandalizng) again. Please see WDSU. If you concur that this is sockpuppetry, can you help with a block or ban? I am just an editor and am not schooled in enforcing wiki policy. I think I have added appropriate tags to the relevant pages. Thanks.Sore bluto (talk) 17:00, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Vandialism?

How was that vandalism? The reference does not state ANYTHING about iHalloween Party in Jennette's tweet. - Alec2011 (talk) 00:51, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

It look like section blanking to me. You provided no edit summary, and so I undid it. I would have left it I yo would have put "rm unrefed" or something similar. Remember for next time OK? Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 00:58, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Why didn't you preview the post first, I usually do? I usually don't bother with it sometimes since I know it's vandalism. i will next time (As I did the second time). - Alec2011 (talk) 01:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

As a matter of fact I did preview it and to me, it just seemed as though you removed decent content. You specified no reason for doing so. I can't read your mind through my computer, so I reverted it. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 01:09, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Whoops, forgot to mention to preview the post and look at the reference, it was just copied from the one above it. I included it the second time though. - Alec2011 (talk) 01:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Edit Summary

For future reference, how do you type this in the Edit Summary? Reverted 1 edit by Alec2011 (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by Miguel1369. (TW) ---- like where it links my name and the "TW - Twinkle" in the Edit Summary?

That is the tag that gets put there for users who choose to use Twinkle to rollback vandalism. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 01:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh so just put (TW) in the edit summary? - Alec2011 (talk) 01:16, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

No. You should go to your preferences and enable twinkle to gain the tools that allow you to place that tag. When you enable twinkle, and look at a diff with the current revision, there will be buttons at the top that says "ROLLBACK (AGF), "ROLLBACK", and ROLLBACK (VANDAL). Simply click one of those buttons and it will automatically do it for you. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 01:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

I cannot find it in my preferences..... I'm not sure where to look, sorry. - Alec2011 (talk) 01:32, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Try clicking this and selecting Twinkle in the Browsing section. If you can't do that then your browser may not be compatable with it. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 01:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Is there suppose to be a "browsing" tab? I don't have one. I'm using Chrome. - Alec2011 (talk) 02:00, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

There is a browsing section in the gadgets tab. I also use chrome. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 14:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

I found it now. Thanks for the help. - Alec2011 (talk) 20:41, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Your very welcome!:) Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 21:14, 20 March 2012 (UTC)