| Revision as of 01:41, 13 April 2012 editMz7 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators77,526 edits not relevant on talk page← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:24, 13 April 2012 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Re: Curius: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0255 --> | <!-- EdwardsBot 0255 --> | ||
| == Re: Curius == | |||
| Re : Edits to deleted articles are not listed on an editor's contribution list. All of that editor's edits have been to deleted articles. -- ] (]) 20:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:24, 13 April 2012
User:Michaelzeng7/usertalk page bar
 Archives |
Archive 1, Cheshire FM Debate (Archive 2), Archive 3, Archive 4, Archive 5 |
Welcome to my talk page. You can talk to me about any one of my edits here.
Think I made a mistake? Your probably right! Post your comment here on the talk page and I will get to you ASAP.
I like to keep my talk page nice and concise. So really anything that is inactive will be archived. When something is archived, you can find those messages in the box to the right. If you want to reopen the discussion, don't do so on the archive page, start a new, fresh one here. In most cases, messages posted automatically (and in some cases, manually), including newsletters, flyers, WikiProject notifications, etc. will not be archived. Rather, it will be blanked.
Don't know where to start? Click here to post a message
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/2012–13 Long Island Blackbirds men's basketball team
You probably shouldn't have closed that discussion. The nominator hadn't withdrawn his delete opinion so there was no universal consensus to delete, and there weren't that many people who'd expressed an opinion. The nominator isn't contesting your close, which is nice, but he'd have very strong grounds to do so IMO. It's not a good idea to non-admin close a discussion that you yourself have been involved in (even an admin won't close a discussion that they've voted on, generally). Just my two cents. I think it was going to be kept anyway, so no skin off anyone's back as far as I'm concerned. Cheers, ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 14:22, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know. I'll keep this in mind the next time I even think about closing an XfD.--Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 02:15, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 April 2012
- Interview: An introduction to movement roles
- Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal
- News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Misplaced Pages's day of mischief
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
- Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case
- Technology report: Somewhere amongst the endless discussions about Gerrit lie details of hackathons, performance blips explained and more
The Signpost: 09 April 2012
- News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee
- WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut
- Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week
- Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases
- Technology report: Next Wikimedia deployment already in the pipeline and details of recent performance improvements
Re: Curius
Re your message: Edits to deleted articles are not listed on an editor's contribution list. All of that editor's edits have been to deleted articles. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC)