| Revision as of 13:30, 18 April 2012 editDoniago (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers113,259 edits 2 - Unsourced | Revision as of 13:38, 18 April 2012 edit undoHertz1888 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers57,227 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Brooklyn Bridge. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ] Please do not add or change content without ] it by citing ], as you did to ]. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> -- ] (]) 13:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC) | ] Please do not add or change content without ] it by citing ], as you did to ]. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> -- ] (]) 13:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 13:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 13:38, 18 April 2012
April 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Brooklyn Bridge. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Brooklyn Bridge shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Hertz1888 (talk) 13:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.