| Revision as of 12:06, 21 April 2012 edit109.145.22.224 (talk) →Article lead section.← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:35, 21 April 2012 edit undoWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,106 edits rv threats and blusterNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| This page has been blanked. --] (]) 19:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC) | This page has been blanked. --] (]) 19:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ..again. | ..again. | ||
| == Article lead section. == | |||
| Quote from Manual of Style (]) and also more notably ]) | |||
| "The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important aspects." | |||
| If the information is not in the main part of the article then it has no place in the lead as it fails to be a summary since you cannot summarise what isn't there. ] (]) 16:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Which part of the Manual of Style are you too stupid to understand? ] (]) 12:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == It looks like I'm not the only person who thinks you are deliberately disruptive. == | |||
| It looks like I'm not the only person who thinks you are deliberately disruptive. | |||
| Found elsewhere:- | |||
| :(...) Because Wtshymanski seems to be editing pages all day long, he keeps putting back his own edits, resulting in a couple of undo's / warring. (...) | |||
| ::Wtshymanski has been a problem for all of us who edit engineering and technology articles for a long time. He has become quite the expert at staying just within the rules while still making Misplaced Pages a hostile place. That's why you see him posting bogus arguments - he has no intention of actually working cooperatively, but he knows that when someone complains about his behavior, an admin will check to see if he is "discussing" things on the talk page. All he needs to do is to make it look technical enough so the admin can't follow the argument. | |||
| ::The best response to Wtshymanski's ongoing disruptive behavior is twofold: First, become very familiar with Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines, and make sure your own behavior is squeaky-clean. (see ]). Second, insist that he also follow the rules. If you get frustrated, drop me a line on my userpage. I am confident that eventually an admin will identify the chaos Wtshymanski is causing and will apply some behavioral restrictions such as a topic ban or a 1RR restriction. (...) --] (]) 21:20, 4 November 2011 (UTC). | |||
| Be careful, because I will complain. ] (]) 17:09, 20 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:35, 21 April 2012
This page has been blanked. --Wtshymanski (talk) 19:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC) ..again.