| Revision as of 18:43, 24 April 2012 editFuture Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,184 edits rv, nonsense.← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:46, 24 April 2012 edit undoSoccershoes1 (talk | contribs)138 edits Undid revision 489029350 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk) The page still caries informationNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Greek primacy''' is a scholarly term in general use for the dominance of ] at certain periods of history. In the context of the ], "Greek primacy" is a ] (Misplaced Pages 2006, print 2007)<ref>First recorded use: {{Citation | title = The Original Aramaic Gospels in Plain English | page = 59 | first = Rev. David | last = Bauscher | year = 2007}}.</ref> for the majority view that the New Testament or its sources were originally written in ]. It is generally accepted by most scholars today that the New Testament of the Bible was written primarily, if not completely, in ] (common) ].<ref>{{Citation | title = The Text of the New Testament. Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration | edition = fourth | first1 = Bruce M | last1 = Metzger | first2 = Bart D | last2 = Ehrman}}.</ref><ref>{{Citation | last1 = Aland | first1 = K | last2 = Aland | first2 = B | title = The text of the New Testament | isbn = 978‐0‐80‐284‐098‐1}}.</ref> A small number of scholars argue instead for "]" or "Hebrew primacy" (other neologisms) for some books, typically Matthew. | |||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| ==Use in socio-historical studies== | |||
| Greek primacy is a term found originally in socio-historical studies, for the cultural dominance of ].<ref>{{Citation | first = Bezalel | last = Bar-Kochva | title = The Image of the Jews in Greek Literature: The Hellenistic Period}}.</ref><ref>{{Citation | first = Shepard Bancroft | last = Clough | title = The rise and fall of civilization | year = 1957 | contribution = Reasons for Greek primacy}}.</ref> | |||
| ==Use by Aramaic primacy advocates== | |||
| The recent use of the term "Greek primacy" to relate to the ] of scholars that the ] is Greek is largely found in sources advocating the minority view (Aramaic primacy) such as Bauscher (2007)<ref>{{Citation | last = Bauscher | title = The Original Aramaic Gospels in Plain English | page = 59 | quote = “]” would decide this matter very easily: the data are much more easily accounted for by ] Primacy than by Greek Primacy. Indeed, Greek Primacy...}}</ref> and Lataster (2009).<ref>{{Citation | last = Lataster | title = Was the New Testament Really Written in Greek? | year = 2009 | chapter = Appendix A — The Deceptive Nature of Greek Primacy}}.</ref> The first use in Misplaced Pages (2006, ) goes back before the first confirmed use in print (2007).<ref>Currently appears to be Bauscher 2007, term does not appear in ].</ref> As such, the term may be an example of a Misplaced Pages neologism. | |||
| ==Notes== | |||
| {{Reflist}} | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Revision as of 22:46, 24 April 2012
Greek primacy is a scholarly term in general use for the dominance of Hellenism at certain periods of history. In the context of the language of the New Testament, "Greek primacy" is a Misplaced Pages neologism (Misplaced Pages 2006, print 2007) for the majority view that the New Testament or its sources were originally written in Koine Greek. It is generally accepted by most scholars today that the New Testament of the Bible was written primarily, if not completely, in Koine (common) Greek. A small number of scholars argue instead for "Aramaic" or "Hebrew primacy" (other neologisms) for some books, typically Matthew.
Use in socio-historical studies
Greek primacy is a term found originally in socio-historical studies, for the cultural dominance of Hellenism.
Use by Aramaic primacy advocates
The recent use of the term "Greek primacy" to relate to the consensus of scholars that the original language of the New Testament is Greek is largely found in sources advocating the minority view (Aramaic primacy) such as Bauscher (2007) and Lataster (2009). The first use in Misplaced Pages (2006, creation of this article) goes back before the first confirmed use in print (2007). As such, the term may be an example of a Misplaced Pages neologism.
Notes
- First recorded use: Bauscher, Rev. David (2007), The Original Aramaic Gospels in Plain English, p. 59.
- Metzger, Bruce M; Ehrman, Bart D, The Text of the New Testament. Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration (fourth ed.).
- Aland, K; Aland, B, The text of the New Testament, ISBN 978‐0‐80‐284‐098‐1
{{citation}}: Check|isbn=value: invalid character (help). - Bar-Kochva, Bezalel, The Image of the Jews in Greek Literature: The Hellenistic Period.
- Clough, Shepard Bancroft (1957), "Reasons for Greek primacy", The rise and fall of civilization.
- Bauscher, The Original Aramaic Gospels in Plain English, p. 59,
"Occam's Razor" would decide this matter very easily: the data are much more easily accounted for by Peshitta Primacy than by Greek Primacy. Indeed, Greek Primacy...
- Lataster (2009), "Appendix A — The Deceptive Nature of Greek Primacy", Was the New Testament Really Written in Greek?.
- Currently appears to be Bauscher 2007, term does not appear in Lamsa.