| Revision as of 20:36, 27 April 2012 editMuboshgu (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators376,311 edits Undid revision 489525480 by Muboshgu (talk)← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:37, 27 April 2012 edit undoMuboshgu (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators376,311 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Cannabis (drug). (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For you most recent medical edits on Misplaced Pages. Contributions such as these , , and show that you are a notable contributor to the topic and are here to keep Misplaced Pages alive with current information. Thanks. ] (]) 20:20, 27 April 2012 (UTC) | |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For you most recent medical edits on Misplaced Pages. Contributions such as these , , and show that you are a notable contributor to the topic and are here to keep Misplaced Pages alive with current information. Thanks. ] (]) 20:20, 27 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| == April 2012 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''I posted on the article's talk page about the problems with those sources, and you simply reverted my edit in clear violation of policies such as ] and ]. I suggest you self-revert rather than face a potential block.'' – ] (]) 20:37, 27 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:37, 27 April 2012
Interests:
- Military
- Politics
- History
- Geography
- Architecture
- Computers and Computing
- Schools and Colleges
- Other
Cannabis Side Effects
The edits you made to Cannabis (drug) need some refinement in order to get them up to WP:RSMED. Rather than watch an edit war unfold (something far too common in that article), I moved your work to the Talk Page until it can be beefed up with secondary sources. I did not do this because I disagree with the conclusions (I do, actually, but my beliefs don't really belong in an encyclopedia). As written, though, it was almost certain to be reverted. I look forward to working with you on the article. Cheers & Thanks, Kevin/Last1in (talk) 19:16, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| For you most recent medical edits on Misplaced Pages. Contributions such as these 1, 2, and 3 show that you are a notable contributor to the topic and are here to keep Misplaced Pages alive with current information. Thanks. Morning277 (talk) 20:20, 27 April 2012 (UTC) |
April 2012
Your recent editing history at Cannabis (drug) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. I posted on the article's talk page about the problems with those sources, and you simply reverted my edit in clear violation of policies such as WP:BRD and Misplaced Pages:Edit warring. I suggest you self-revert rather than face a potential block. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:37, 27 April 2012 (UTC)