| Revision as of 19:02, 29 April 2012 editYoureallycan (talk | contribs)12,095 edits →Article title and lede← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:05, 29 April 2012 edit undoJunoBeach (talk | contribs)1,367 edits →Article title and ledeNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| ::In reality <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> did not like the article I started ]. He is now wiki-stalking me through my edits. In the case of this article, he was +tag spamming and is now trying to gain support to have the article deleted. If he requires more citations, then he can simply do a google search, I am sure there are plenty around. My final words on the matter. ] (]) 13:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC) | ::In reality <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> did not like the article I started ]. He is now wiki-stalking me through my edits. In the case of this article, he was +tag spamming and is now trying to gain support to have the article deleted. If he requires more citations, then he can simply do a google search, I am sure there are plenty around. My final words on the matter. ] (]) 13:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Perhaps in your reality - I couldn't care less about any of that -my only interest is in neutral content - until the issue is resolved please leave the template in position as is normal wiki practice - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 19:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC) | ::::Perhaps in your reality - I couldn't care less about any of that -my only interest is in neutral content - until the issue is resolved please leave the template in position as is normal wiki practice - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 19:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :::There is no requirement for that +tag, please stop posting it. ] (]) 19:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:05, 29 April 2012
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the War criminals in Canada article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Article title and lede
I am not even sure this article should exist under this title? The lede is also opinionated so I have added a NPOV template until its resolved - Youreallycan 22:52, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Explain your statements here, I cannot make any sense of them nor will the editor. I also suggest you remove the NPOV template and challange specific facts BO; talk 23:13, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- Please don't remove article issue templates without resolving the issue . War criminals in Brazil - War criminals in Argentina = this absence of other articles under a similar title makes me wonder if this article should even exist under this title- is the topic sufficiently notable for an article? The other issue is the lede - its a opinionated statement the fails to explain the article title or to report what the article is about. = I am on a mobile device and limited to input but later I will look at asking a couple of experienced article creators what they feel about these points Youreallycan 09:12, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- In reality Youreallycan did not like the article I started Vladimir Katriuk. He is now wiki-stalking me through my edits. In the case of this article, he was +tag spamming and is now trying to gain support to have the article deleted. If he requires more citations, then he can simply do a google search, I am sure there are plenty around. My final words on the matter. JunoBeach (talk) 13:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Perhaps in your reality - I couldn't care less about any of that -my only interest is in neutral content - until the issue is resolved please leave the template in position as is normal wiki practice - Youreallycan 19:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- In reality Youreallycan did not like the article I started Vladimir Katriuk. He is now wiki-stalking me through my edits. In the case of this article, he was +tag spamming and is now trying to gain support to have the article deleted. If he requires more citations, then he can simply do a google search, I am sure there are plenty around. My final words on the matter. JunoBeach (talk) 13:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- There is no requirement for that +tag, please stop posting it. JunoBeach (talk) 19:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)