Misplaced Pages

User talk:195.47.198.7: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:46, 2 May 2012 editRichwales (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators18,007 edits May 2012: another warning about editing at Decapitation← Previous edit Revision as of 22:45, 2 May 2012 edit undoRichwales (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators18,007 edits May 2012: adding official ArbCom discretionary sanctions warning noticeNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:


I note that you re-did essentially the same changes to this article, even after I posted the above gentle notice. Again, this material '''''does not belong''''' in the ] article: it goes way beyond the subject of this particular article, and perhaps more importantly, you removed material that '''''was''''' directly relevant to decapitation (along with sources for the same) in order to insert your out-of-scope information in its place. It is '''''very important''''' that you do '''''not''''' keep on doing this. Please also be aware that '''''any''''' treatment of Balkans-related topics '''''anywhere''''' in Misplaced Pages is subject to the Arbitration Committee's ]; see ]. — ]] 16:46, 2 May 2012 (UTC) I note that you re-did essentially the same changes to this article, even after I posted the above gentle notice. Again, this material '''''does not belong''''' in the ] article: it goes way beyond the subject of this particular article, and perhaps more importantly, you removed material that '''''was''''' directly relevant to decapitation (along with sources for the same) in order to insert your out-of-scope information in its place. It is '''''very important''''' that you do '''''not''''' keep on doing this. Please also be aware that '''''any''''' treatment of Balkans-related topics '''''anywhere''''' in Misplaced Pages is subject to the Arbitration Committee's ]; see ]. — ]] 16:46, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

----
So that there will be no question that you have been properly cautioned on this issue, I am including the official user warning box below. If you redo the same (or substantially the same) change at the ] article, replacing the existing description of beheadings during the Srebrenica massacre with a general overview of the massacre and emphasizing the identification of same as genocide or a war crime, you risk being ] from this article, triggering ] of this article so as to prevent its being edited by users who are not logged in with established accounts, or being ] from editing Misplaced Pages altogether.

{| class="messagebox" style="width: 100%; background: ivory;"
| ]
|
| The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], any expected ], or any ]. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the ] section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} -->
|}

Although the ] article is not generally an article about the Balkans, the Arbitration Committee's sanctions in this instance apply equally well to material related to the Balkans '''''anywhere''''' in Misplaced Pages. Please be sure you understand that the intent here is '''''not''''' to censor content or prevent a proper characterization of the Srebrenica massacre, but simply to make it clear that there are other, legitimate places in Misplaced Pages for this incident to be dealt with at length — whereas the ] article is intended to deal specifically and exclusively with the topic of '''''decapitation''''' (beheading).

— ]] 22:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:45, 2 May 2012


October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nusrat Bhutto, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

May 2012

Hi. Regarding your recent edits to the Decapitation article, your changes had to be reverted (undone) because the subject of this article is specifically decapitation. The section you rewrote originally dealt with instances of decapitation (beheading) during the Srebrenica massacre, but your rewritten version of the section removed all mention of decapitation and replaced it with a general overview of the massacre itself. Your material might be appropriate for some other article or articles about Srebrenica, war crimes, genocide, etc., but I honestly don't believe it belongs in the article about decapitation. Please don't be discouraged or upset at this; please continue to find ways to improve Misplaced Pages. — Richwales 18:15, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

I note that you re-did essentially the same changes to this article, even after I posted the above gentle notice. Again, this material does not belong in the Decapitation article: it goes way beyond the subject of this particular article, and perhaps more importantly, you removed material that was directly relevant to decapitation (along with sources for the same) in order to insert your out-of-scope information in its place. It is very important that you do not keep on doing this. Please also be aware that any treatment of Balkans-related topics anywhere in Misplaced Pages is subject to the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions; see WP:ARBMAC#Standard discretionary sanctions. — Richwales 16:46, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


So that there will be no question that you have been properly cautioned on this issue, I am including the official user warning box below. If you redo the same (or substantially the same) change at the Decapitation article, replacing the existing description of beheadings during the Srebrenica massacre with a general overview of the massacre and emphasizing the identification of same as genocide or a war crime, you risk being banned from this article, triggering protection of this article so as to prevent its being edited by users who are not logged in with established accounts, or being blocked from editing Misplaced Pages altogether.

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Balkans. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia#Final decision section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page.

Although the Decapitation article is not generally an article about the Balkans, the Arbitration Committee's sanctions in this instance apply equally well to material related to the Balkans anywhere in Misplaced Pages. Please be sure you understand that the intent here is not to censor content or prevent a proper characterization of the Srebrenica massacre, but simply to make it clear that there are other, legitimate places in Misplaced Pages for this incident to be dealt with at length — whereas the Decapitation article is intended to deal specifically and exclusively with the topic of decapitation (beheading).

Richwales 22:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)