Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 11:19, 13 May 2012

If I leave a message for you: Please respond on your talk page. I'll probably add it to my watchlist, but if I miss something, feel free to leave a talkback. If you leave a message for me: I will most likely respond here. Either add this page to your watchlist or ask me to notify you of a response on your talk page. Note: I reserve the right to decline or withdraw from a situation that is escalating or uncomfortable, without giving a reason, or to take further action through permissable means. (See this policy.) If I mistakenly called your edits as vandalism when I reverted them, it was probably because you did not leave an edit summary. Please realize that, in many cases, unexplained edits are indistinguishable from vandalism! This also applies to Rollbacks. If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you will be reverted...and beware the giant dice.

This editor is an Illustrious Looshpah and is entitled to display this Book of All Knowledge.

Archives

as Aerobird - Jul 2008-Apr 2010 - May 2010 - Jun 2010-Oct 2010 - Nov 2010-Dec 2010 - Jan 2011-Mar 2011 - Apr 2011-Sep 2011 - Oct 2011 - Nov 2011-Dec 2011 - Jan 2012-Feb 2012 - Mar 2012-Apr 2012 - Apr 2012-

This page has archives. Sections older than 2 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present.

DYK nomination of NASCAR Grand National East Series

Hello! Your submission of NASCAR Grand National East Series at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LauraHale (talk) 10:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

CFD

What is the process for further discussion on CFD after it has been closed? With Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 April 28#Category:Articles needing images the only opposes were from contributors that have not been active in this area and I think not aware of the discussion that have taken place over the years on the subject. Yes the wording of this administration category on requests for images is a little annoying but that is what it is. OK, I can live with the decision but seams a little annoying to keep a category that no one uses and is only misleading. --Traveler100 (talk) 17:29, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

That'd be WP:DRV, I believe. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 14:06, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

RfC/U notice

As you have worked with User:Agent00f, I wanted to make you aware of Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Agent00f. I know it's moving backwards, but I'd like to have all previous attempts at least tried before going for the final solution. Hasteur (talk) 01:35, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, but I believe I left my ten-foot pole in my other set of adventuring gear. :) - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 14:10, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Whitespace

The discussion an AN/I regarding white space is a difference when a hidden comment is followed or preceded by a line break (enter on the keyboard). Please drop me a line if you need clarification.Curb Chain (talk) 17:29, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Still needs to go to WP:DRN, I think. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:09, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Well, isn't this a site wide issue, regarding format; more of a manual of style purview than a dispute on one article?Curb Chain (talk) 04:50, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Well, if it's a MOS issue, perhaps WT:MOS? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:19, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

New CfD

Since you participated in earlier CfDs about related categories, I want to make sure you know about Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 May 12#Category:Church buildings in the United States by state. --Orlady (talk) 22:42, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I looked that over but don't have a strong feeling either way on this one. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:09, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Strange...

• BR, did I get this wrong? His block log clearly shows that he was blocked once for disruptive behaviour. Also, the IP has twice reverted (1 & 2) that standard Static ISP template and is now acccusing me of being related to another editor here. Thoughts? --Dave 00:41, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Looks to me like "pot-stirring", best to let the sock-accusations bounce off as I do with those who insist I must be Archtransit (talk · contribs)! - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:12, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

• What about the warning template? FWIW, he has removed it twice without giving any explanation whatsoever. --Dave 03:15, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

• Not sure about the static-IP template. As for the warning template, IIRC he's technically allowed to remove it, even without comment, but in doing so implicitly acknolwedges that it has been "read and understood". - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:16, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

• TBH, I haven't got much confidence in the IP editor due to his constant edit warring earlier on Julie Chen and now on Judge Judy with other editors, I will restore that template and leave it at that, barring his imminent second block, I will just add another template of "Repeat-Vandal" at a later stage. Thoughts? --Dave 03:24, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

• Sounds reasonable enough. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:53, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

• Thank you... and it is done~! --Dave 04:05, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

• Update: Why am I not surprised... see the gem of his edit summary. Also, he just lighted up my sock radar for some strange reasons. Thoughts? --Dave 09:04, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Facepalm He's obviously not new to the WikiWorld, but as for who, well, no idea! - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:17, 13 May 2012 (UTC)