| Revision as of 20:31, 6 June 2012 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 30d) to User talk:Roscelese/Archive 8.← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:12, 7 June 2012 edit undoEsoglou (talk | contribs)31,527 edits →Tying up: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| Be careful with reverting going forward, thanks. --] 14:41, 29 May 2012 (UTC) | Be careful with reverting going forward, thanks. --] 14:41, 29 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :Generally RR exempts obvious vandalism, and an unexplained revert by an account devoted to hounding me seemed to fit the bill. Nonetheless, thank you. –] (] ⋅ ]) 15:49, 29 May 2012 (UTC) | :Generally RR exempts obvious vandalism, and an unexplained revert by an account devoted to hounding me seemed to fit the bill. Nonetheless, thank you. –] (] ⋅ ]) 15:49, 29 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Tying up == | |||
| Is how you want to tie me up?...I kid, I kid... ] (]) 11:12, 7 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:12, 7 June 2012
 Archives |
|
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Your perspective would be valued
Hi there. I would appreciate it if you could visit Talk:Muhammad. The article, Muhammad, has changed in a significant way since it originally passed WP:GA several years ago. It now states in the opening paragraph that Mohammad is the Founder of Islam and has relegated to a note at the end of the article that Muslims, themselves don't believe this. I have started a discussion on the talk page concerning this and would value your input. Thanks so much. Veritycheck (talk) 21:38, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- My involvement in that page has been very tangential so I'm not sure why you're contacting me. I'll take a look, but can't promise any valuable perspective. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:51, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- But still... how often on Misplaced Pages does someone tell you that your opinion would be valued? :) MastCell 00:26, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Template:LGBT rights table Europe
Hi. Could you give your opinion to edit by Eraserhead1? See Ron 1987 (talk) 01:18, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- I agree with the reversion. Deciding that some partnerships are to be considered marriage and some are not, when they're not officially marriage, seems like an OR-ish insertion. The problem could be solved by adding a note either by the specific case or as a general part of the header that some "recognitions" of unions confer more rights than others, sometimes approaching the same number of rights as marriage. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:23, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Could you add your opinion here? Regards. Ron 1987 (talk) 01:35, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you
I had tried to revert the edit where Qibla was moved without discussion, but I must have done it incorrectly somehow, it seems it only reverted the content of the article instead of the actual move. Thank you for correcting that. Peter Deer (talk) 23:41, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Carlo Bon Compagni
Hi Roscelese. Since you know the Italian language very well, could you please look at my stub on Carlo Bon Compagni di Mombello and the Italian version of the article? It would be nice if we were not having a heated argument about a controversial topic for a change. Best regards, Jeff5102 (talk) 14:49, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
- I mean, I can translate the Italian article, if that's what you'd like? –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:25, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
- That would be nice, yes.Jeff5102 (talk) 20:22, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
- And thanks for editing. For me this is more satisfying than our discussions on articles involving former muslims. If you ever would like to have some dutch text translated, you know where to find me.Jeff5102 (talk) 07:55, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- That would be nice, yes.Jeff5102 (talk) 20:22, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Coleman 1RR
Be careful with reverting going forward, thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:41, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Generally RR exempts obvious vandalism, and an unexplained revert by an account devoted to hounding me seemed to fit the bill. Nonetheless, thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:49, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Tying up
Is this how you want to tie me up?...I kid, I kid... Esoglou (talk) 11:12, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
