| Revision as of 04:54, 12 April 2012 editCalabe1992 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,921 editsm Reverted edits by LionSlicer89 (talk) to last revision by This, that and the other (HG)← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:16, 14 June 2012 edit undoJoefromrandb (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users38,279 edits "pound for pound" is far more than a dictionary entry; this article includes specific references for boxing- and martial arts-related entries; unnecessary redirectNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Pound for pound''' is a term to describe how any two things compare when bearing in mind their varying quantities; for example, a tin of tomatoes weighing 250 g and costing $2.50 is more expensive, pound for pound, than one weighing 500 g and costing $4 (as the former costs $1.00 per 100 g and the latter $0.80 per 100 g). | |||
| {{Wiktionary redirect|pound-for-pound}}{{Short pages monitor}}<!-- This long comment was added to the page to prevent it from being listed on Special:Shortpages. It and the accompanying monitoring template were generated via Template:Long comment. Please do not remove the monitor template without removing the comment as well.--> | |||
| ==In sport== | |||
| It is used in ]s such as ]<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/4184227.stm |title=BBC pound-for-pound British rankings |publisher=] |date=8 June 2011 |accessdate=17 June 2011 }}</ref> or ]<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.fightersonlymagazine.co.uk/features/viewarticle.php?id=4258 |first=Matt |last=Hyde |title=The pound for pound debate |work=Fighters Only Magazine |date=8 April 2010 |accessdate=2010-06-29 }}</ref> to describe a fighter's value in relation to fighters of different ]es. As these fighters do not compete directly judging the best fighter pound for pound is subjective and ratings vary. They may be based on a range of criteria including "quality of opposition", factors such as how exciting the fighter is or how famous they are, or be an attempt to determine who would win if all the those ranked were the same size. In boxing, '']'' magazine maintains a ] of fighters. ] has a list for mixed martial artists.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://espn.go.com/mma/rankings |title=MMA Power Rankings |author= ESPN.com staff |date=2 June 2011 |publisher=] |accessdate=17 June 2011}}</ref> For example; "Pound for pound, Jesse Albright can beat up Ben Haney". ] is an example of a pound-for-pound top fighter. | |||
| ==References== | |||
| {{Reflist}} | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Term-stub}} | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Revision as of 19:16, 14 June 2012
Pound for pound is a term to describe how any two things compare when bearing in mind their varying quantities; for example, a tin of tomatoes weighing 250 g and costing $2.50 is more expensive, pound for pound, than one weighing 500 g and costing $4 (as the former costs $1.00 per 100 g and the latter $0.80 per 100 g).
In sport
It is used in combat sports such as boxing or mixed martial arts to describe a fighter's value in relation to fighters of different weight classes. As these fighters do not compete directly judging the best fighter pound for pound is subjective and ratings vary. They may be based on a range of criteria including "quality of opposition", factors such as how exciting the fighter is or how famous they are, or be an attempt to determine who would win if all the those ranked were the same size. In boxing, The Ring magazine maintains a pound for pound rank of fighters. ESPN.com has a list for mixed martial artists. For example; "Pound for pound, Jesse Albright can beat up Ben Haney". Jose Aldo is an example of a pound-for-pound top fighter.
References
- "BBC pound-for-pound British rankings". BBC News. 8 June 2011. Retrieved 17 June 2011.
- Hyde, Matt (8 April 2010). "The pound for pound debate". Fighters Only Magazine. Retrieved 2010-06-29.
- ESPN.com staff (2 June 2011). "MMA Power Rankings". ESPN. Retrieved 17 June 2011.
 | This vocabulary-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |