Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:40, 20 June 2012

June 2012

This is a final warning. Your behaviour in reverting against the consensus of several other editors and against the policy documented at WP:SYNTH in the X-ray computed tomography article, as well as your "wall of text" swamping of the talk page is tendentious editing and will lead to your editing privileges being withdrawn if you continue. Switching IPs to evade scrutiny will not work as IP ranges as just as easily blocked. As is made clear in WP:SOAP, Misplaced Pages is not he place for you to campaign to expose the problems you imagine exist with CT scans. --RexxS (talk) 02:16, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

You haven't replied to my question at the article talk page, your page, my page, etc. I am participating in a WP:BOLD discussion, and if you have nothing to say about the content, please let me know now, and I will consider you to have withdrawn from your argument at the talk page, and revert the change you did.

I see you finally replied in the talk page, I will read your reply now.

Blocked

You avoided a sanction for a clear 3RR violation here, largely because the reviewing admins wanted to give you a chance to stop edit-warring and try to convince people on the talk page. Given the resumption of edit-warring, I've blocked your IP for 24 hours. When the block expires, please use the talk page and try to reach a consensus before repeatedly reinserting the same disputed material. It's clear that there are significant good-faith objections to the material, and those need to be addressed without concurrent attempts to force the material into the article. I would strongly consider limiting yourself to one edit (or set of contiguous edits) to the article per day. If your edits truly have consensus, then you don't need to keep edit-warring. If they don't have consensus, then you need to follow the steps outlined here rather than continuing to edit-war. MastCell  04:21, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

79.182.199.172 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I didn't violate 3RR, and didn't violate it today. I followed ] , and a few of my edits today seem to have been accepted. The editor who complained about me on the other hand, had some of his edits reverted by an other editor. ] (]) 04:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I didn't violate 3RR, and didn't violate it today. I followed ] , and a few of my edits today seem to have been accepted. The editor who complained about me on the other hand, had some of his edits reverted by an other editor. ] (]) 04:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I didn't violate 3RR, and didn't violate it today. I followed ] , and a few of my edits today seem to have been accepted. The editor who complained about me on the other hand, had some of his edits reverted by an other editor. ] (]) 04:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

,

I just closed the relevant AN3 report, coming to the same conclusion as the blocking administrator above. Since I started there, I am going to restrict myself to endorsing the original block without prejudice to anyone else reviewing this unblock request. However, IP 79.xxx, I have left a little advice for you at the edit warring noticeboard. You may also wish to consider the advantages of registering an account. - 2/0 (cont.) 06:40, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

• Requests for unblock