| Revision as of 06:40, 20 June 2012 edit2over0 (talk | contribs)17,247 edits →Blocked: comments for you at AN3← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:01, 20 June 2012 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,204 edits →Blocked: Unblock declinedNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| You avoided a sanction for a clear 3RR violation , largely because the reviewing admins wanted to give you a chance to stop edit-warring and try to convince people on the talk page. Given the resumption of edit-warring, I've blocked your IP for 24 hours. When the block expires, please use the talk page and try to reach a consensus ''before'' repeatedly reinserting the same disputed material. It's clear that there are significant good-faith objections to the material, and those need to be addressed ''without'' concurrent attempts to force the material into the article. I would strongly consider limiting yourself to one edit (or set of contiguous edits) to the article per day. If your edits truly have consensus, then you don't need to keep edit-warring. If they ''don't'' have consensus, then you need to follow the steps outlined ] rather than continuing to edit-war. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 04:21, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | You avoided a sanction for a clear 3RR violation , largely because the reviewing admins wanted to give you a chance to stop edit-warring and try to convince people on the talk page. Given the resumption of edit-warring, I've blocked your IP for 24 hours. When the block expires, please use the talk page and try to reach a consensus ''before'' repeatedly reinserting the same disputed material. It's clear that there are significant good-faith objections to the material, and those need to be addressed ''without'' concurrent attempts to force the material into the article. I would strongly consider limiting yourself to one edit (or set of contiguous edits) to the article per day. If your edits truly have consensus, then you don't need to keep edit-warring. If they ''don't'' have consensus, then you need to follow the steps outlined ] rather than continuing to edit-war. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 04:21, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|reason=I didn't violate 3RR, and didn't violate it today. I followed ] , and a few of my edits today seem to have been accepted. The editor who complained about me on the other hand, had some of his edits reverted by an other editor. ] (]) 04:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC)|decline=Since mid-April, under a variety of IPs you have continued to try to force your new thinking into the ] article. You seem to be eager to draw attention to the risks of ionizing radiation to the patient. Your changes have usually been opposed by others, many of whom have experience with medical articles and know Misplaced Pages policy well. When your block expires, you should negotiate patiently on the talk page to see if you can reach agreement with the others. If it turns out that your views are outside the current consensus, you should let the matter go and not keep reverting the article. See ] for why conducting an edit war with a fluctuating IP is frowned upon. ] (]) 07:01, 20 June 2012 (UTC) }} | |||
| {{unblock|reason=I didn't violate 3RR, and didn't violate it today. I followed ] , and a few of my edits today seem to have been accepted. The editor who complained about me on the other hand, had some of his edits reverted by an other editor. ] (]) 04:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC)}}, | |||
| I just closed the relevant ] report, coming to the same conclusion as the blocking administrator above. Since I started there, I am going to restrict myself to endorsing the original block without prejudice to anyone else reviewing this unblock request. However, IP 79.xxx, I have left a little advice for you at the edit warring noticeboard. You may also wish to consider ]. - ] <small>(])</small> 06:40, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | I just closed the relevant ] report, coming to the same conclusion as the blocking administrator above. Since I started there, I am going to restrict myself to endorsing the original block without prejudice to anyone else reviewing this unblock request. However, IP 79.xxx, I have left a little advice for you at the edit warring noticeboard. You may also wish to consider ]. - ] <small>(])</small> 06:40, 20 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:01, 20 June 2012
June 2012
This is a final warning. Your behaviour in reverting against the consensus of several other editors and against the policy documented at WP:SYNTH in the X-ray computed tomography article, as well as your "wall of text" swamping of the talk page is tendentious editing and will lead to your editing privileges being withdrawn if you continue. Switching IPs to evade scrutiny will not work as IP ranges as just as easily blocked. As is made clear in WP:SOAP, Misplaced Pages is not he place for you to campaign to expose the problems you imagine exist with CT scans. --RexxS (talk) 02:16, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- You haven't replied to my question at the article talk page, your page, my page, etc. I am participating in a WP:BOLD discussion, and if you have nothing to say about the content, please let me know now, and I will consider you to have withdrawn from your argument at the talk page, and revert the change you did.
- I see you finally replied in the talk page, I will read your reply now.
Blocked
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. MastCell 04:21, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
You avoided a sanction for a clear 3RR violation here, largely because the reviewing admins wanted to give you a chance to stop edit-warring and try to convince people on the talk page. Given the resumption of edit-warring, I've blocked your IP for 24 hours. When the block expires, please use the talk page and try to reach a consensus before repeatedly reinserting the same disputed material. It's clear that there are significant good-faith objections to the material, and those need to be addressed without concurrent attempts to force the material into the article. I would strongly consider limiting yourself to one edit (or set of contiguous edits) to the article per day. If your edits truly have consensus, then you don't need to keep edit-warring. If they don't have consensus, then you need to follow the steps outlined here rather than continuing to edit-war. MastCell 04:21, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
79.182.199.172 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I didn't violate 3RR, and didn't violate it today. I followed WP:CYCLE , and a few of my edits today seem to have been accepted. The editor who complained about me on the other hand, had some of his edits reverted by an other editor. 79.182.199.172 (talk) 04:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since mid-April, under a variety of IPs you have continued to try to force your new thinking into the X-ray computed tomography article. You seem to be eager to draw attention to the risks of ionizing radiation to the patient. Your changes have usually been opposed by others, many of whom have experience with medical articles and know Misplaced Pages policy well. When your block expires, you should negotiate patiently on the talk page to see if you can reach agreement with the others. If it turns out that your views are outside the current consensus, you should let the matter go and not keep reverting the article. See WP:SCRUTINY for why conducting an edit war with a fluctuating IP is frowned upon. EdJohnston (talk) 07:01, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I just closed the relevant AN3 report, coming to the same conclusion as the blocking administrator above. Since I started there, I am going to restrict myself to endorsing the original block without prejudice to anyone else reviewing this unblock request. However, IP 79.xxx, I have left a little advice for you at the edit warring noticeboard. You may also wish to consider the advantages of registering an account. - 2/0 (cont.) 06:40, 20 June 2012 (UTC)