Revision as of 03:27, 2 July 2012 view sourceSatellizer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers40,729 edits nao← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:20, 2 July 2012 view source Acalamari (talk | contribs)Bureaucrats, Administrators117,884 edits →User:Athleek123: Done/responseNext edit → | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
*<span class="plainlinks">] · (] · ] · ] · ] · · · · · {{plainlink|1={{fullurl:Special:Log|user=Athleek123}} logs}} · · · · · ] · ] · ] · ] · ]) (]) (<sup><small> · · · c</sup></small>)</span> | *<span class="plainlinks">] · (] · ] · ] · ] · · · · · {{plainlink|1={{fullurl:Special:Log|user=Athleek123}} logs}} · · · · · ] · ] · ] · ] · ]) (]) (<sup><small> · · · c</sup></small>)</span> | ||
:I would like to use Huggle but I need Rollback permissions to do so. Please check to see what work I have done to fight vandalism Thanks, <span style="border:2px solid black;background:#006633;">]''']'''</span> 20:09, 1 July 2012 (UTC) | :I would like to use Huggle but I need Rollback permissions to do so. Please check to see what work I have done to fight vandalism Thanks, <span style="border:2px solid black;background:#006633;">]''']'''</span> 20:09, 1 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
{{nao}} Seems like a good user, he has made many helpful contributions. He has my vote. Cheers, ] <small><sub>]</sub> ''No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here.''</small> 22:32, 1 July 2012 (UTC) | :{{nao}} Seems like a good user, he has made many helpful contributions. He has my vote. Cheers, ] <small><sub>]</sub> ''No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here.''</small> 22:32, 1 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
{{nao}} Mine too. <span style="border:2px solid #00FFFF;background:purple;">]''']'''</span> <sup>]</sup> 03:27, 2 July 2012 (UTC) | :{{nao}} Mine too. <span style="border:2px solid #00FFFF;background:purple;">]''']'''</span> <sup>]</sup> 03:27, 2 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
::{{done}} Reverts look okay; Riley Huntley and Cyan Gardevoir, please consider not making "endorsements" or even "opposition" votes for someone's request, as this isn't RfA. If there is a reason why someone should not have a particular userright, then by all means feel free to mention it, but votes here aren't helpful, and no admin is going to accept any request without doing their own review first. Thanks. ] 08:20, 2 July 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:20, 2 July 2012
Requests for permissions | |
---|---|
Common | |
Uncommon | |
Logs | |
Special |
Rollback
User:Jordon (WMF)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
User:Adjkasi
- Adjkasi · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · identified · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ()
- Next time I will not revert non-vandalism again on pages, and give me back my rollback feature or I will delete Huggle.exe from my computer and will never come back. I may also be blocked indef by a sysop without having talk page access. Adjkasi (T | C | L) 04:13, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- Not done You asked on your talk page, I asked a question and you shortly later archived the talk page (again not responding to feedback). I think you need to stay away from any semi-automated tools until you learn to communicate with those who may bring up potential problems with said edits. You have shown so far that you have not realized that Rollback is an efficient tool for reducing vandalism, not upping your edit count. Calmer Waters 04:31, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
User:Athleek123
- Athleek123 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · identified · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) ()
- I would like to use Huggle but I need Rollback permissions to do so. Please check my contributions to see what work I have done to fight vandalism Thanks, Athleek123 20:09, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Seems like a good user, he has made many helpful contributions. He has my vote. Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 22:32, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Mine too. CyanGardevoir 03:27, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- Done Reverts look okay; Riley Huntley and Cyan Gardevoir, please consider not making "endorsements" or even "opposition" votes for someone's request, as this isn't RfA. If there is a reason why someone should not have a particular userright, then by all means feel free to mention it, but votes here aren't helpful, and no admin is going to accept any request without doing their own review first. Thanks. Acalamari 08:20, 2 July 2012 (UTC)