| Revision as of 23:42, 9 July 2012 editJohnBlackburne (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,799 edits →You are Loblolly?: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:15, 10 July 2012 edit undoHublolly (talk | contribs)180 edits →You are Loblolly?: corrections becuase P0M got it wrongNext edit → | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| : Thanks for the notification; commented.--<small>]</small><sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">]</sub> 23:28, 9 July 2012 (UTC) | : Thanks for the notification; commented.--<small>]</small><sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">]</sub> 23:28, 9 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == You are Loblolly? == | == You are <s>Loblolly</s> Hublolly? == | ||
| You added comment to a section on abusive behavior by user Loblolly. Unless you are the same person, please put the remark where it really belongs. ] (]) 23:33, 9 July 2012 (UTC) | You added comment to a section on abusive behavior by user <s>Loblolly</s> Hublolly. Unless you are the same person, please put the remark where it really belongs. ] (]) 23:33, 9 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
| Sorry, I didn't see the previous message. So if you meant to comment on the complaint lodged against Loblolly, who were you painting as the bad guy? It seemed to me you were saying that the complaint against Loblolly is not well motivated.] (]) 23:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC) | Sorry, I didn't see the previous message. So if you meant to comment on the complaint lodged against <s>Loblolly</s> Hublolly, who were you painting as the bad guy? It seemed to me you were saying that the complaint against <s>Loblolly</s> Hublolly is not well motivated.] (]) 23:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
| : No, I was commenting on ]; I previously encountered him on ].--<small>]</small><sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">]</sub> 23:42, 9 July 2012 (UTC) | : No, I was commenting on ]; I previously encountered him on ].--<small>]</small><sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">]</sub> 23:42, 9 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:15, 10 July 2012
 Archives |
|
– Feb 2010, |
removal of picture of Maynard Smith
Thanks for your effort to compensate for the removal of photo of JMS. The removal was a massive error by Wikimedia Commons as full permission to use was received by them... See below. If you have any influence can you help to get the Maynard Smith photo reinstated. This is VERY frustrating to say the least. Best wishes --HowieKor (talk) 03:33, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
From: <grazyna.dobosz@webofstories.com> Date: 21 June 2012 11:00:49 GMT+01:0 To: <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> Subject: Ticket number 2012052310010548 To Whom It May Concern I hereby affirm that Web of Stories Ltd (“WoS”) is the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the attached image of John Maynard Smith. WoS agree to publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0" (unported) and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). “WoS” acknowledge that by doing so “WoS” grants anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. “WoS” is aware that this agreement is not limited to Misplaced Pages or related sites. “WoS” is aware that “WoS” always retain copyright of this work, and retains the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by “WoS”. “WoS” is aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and “WoS” reserves the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc. “WoS” acknowledges that “WoS” cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Anne Greenwood Group Managing Director Web of Stories Ltd Science Navigation Group Middlesex House 34-42 Cleveland Street London W1T 4LB Date 21 June 2012
- Sorry, it's not something I know much about. I've a little experience of modern copyright, fair-use and the like but no experience of OTRS and the like, and spend very little time on Commons.--JohnBlackburnedeeds 16:38, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- Resolved and restored now by the looks of it.--JohnBlackburnedeeds 02:16, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Template:Tol
Why would you try to speedy delete Template:Tol? I don't understand. I hope we can resolve this without a big fuss. Yours aye, Buaidh 19:06, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- As always it's best to discuss this at the relevant discussion page.--JohnBlackburnedeeds 20:13, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- The merits of this template seem to have little to do with your actions. Perhaps we should discuss this offline. Buaidh 21:57, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Template:LI redo
Substituting Template:Ll renders a simple template unintelligible. Yours aye, Buaidh 19:13, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Intolerable behaviour by new user:Hublolly
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding the intolerable behaviour by new user:Hublolly. The thread is Intolerable behaviour by new user:Hublolly. Thank you.
See talk:cross product#Proposed mnemonical illustration for what I mean (I had to include you by WP:ANI guidelines, sorry...)
F = q(E+v×B)⇄ ∑ici 23:04, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification; commented.--JohnBlackburnedeeds 23:28, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
You are Loblolly Hublolly?
You added comment to a section on abusive behavior by user Loblolly Hublolly. Unless you are the same person, please put the remark where it really belongs. P0M (talk) 23:33, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't see the previous message. So if you meant to comment on the complaint lodged against Loblolly Hublolly, who were you painting as the bad guy? It seemed to me you were saying that the complaint against Loblolly Hublolly is not well motivated.P0M (talk) 23:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- No, I was commenting on User:Hublolly; I previously encountered him on Talk:Cross product.--JohnBlackburnedeeds 23:42, 9 July 2012 (UTC)