Talk:Operation Musketeer (1956): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 16:51, 27 July 2012 editBbb23 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators270,189 edits Undid revision 504451828 by One Night In Hackney (talk) - not banned, not even sock-blocked (unreported AFAIK), why not address contention?)← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:52, 27 July 2012 edit undoBbb23 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators270,189 edits →International reaction: commentNext edit →
Line 23:		Line 23:

	South Africa strongly supported the military operation at the United Nations, along with Australia and New Zealand. (] (]) 14:58, 27 July 2012 (UTC))		South Africa strongly supported the military operation at the United Nations, along with Australia and New Zealand. (] (]) 14:58, 27 July 2012 (UTC))
			:When you return from your block, please provide a source for your statement.--] (]) 16:52, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:52, 27 July 2012

France Unassessed

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: African / British / European / French Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	African military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

Egypt Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

vidz

i have posted rare archive videos of the brits and french in the suez crisis article's media links and discussion page. some will be moved here. Shame On You 03:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

full campaign report!! everything!

Amiral Barjot's report on the suez campaign pt.1&pt.2 French Minister of Defense archives. Shame On You 02:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Immediate suggestions

Ummm, can we say a) where the operation took place and b) when? I mean we haven't even localized it to a century!

Also, the controversy over the landing selection -- the choice of Port Said rather than the Army's preference to land at Alexandria -- should be detailed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.182.88 (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

International reaction

South Africa strongly supported the military operation at the United Nations, along with Australia and New Zealand. (92.10.140.17 (talk) 14:58, 27 July 2012 (UTC))

When you return from your block, please provide a source for your statement.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:52, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Categories: