Revision as of 23:14, 29 July 2012 editSnake bgd (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,367 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:04, 1 August 2012 edit undoToddst1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors137,716 edits →ARBMAC: new sectionNext edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
|} | |} | ||
== August 2012 == | |||
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] <small>(])</small> 22:04, 1 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
== ARBMAC == | |||
] In a 2007 ], administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing ]-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-balkans2--> ] <small>(])</small> 22:04, 1 August 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:04, 1 August 2012
User talk: Snake bgd
August 2012Your recent editing history at List of Presidents of Serbia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Toddst1 (talk) 22:04, 1 August 2012 (UTC) ARBMACIn a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 22:04, 1 August 2012 (UTC) |