Misplaced Pages

16:10 aspect ratio: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:20, 5 August 2012 editIndrek (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,958 edits →Industry moves away from 16:10 in 2008 to 16:9: Restored rewrite of copy&pasted material (per WP:NOR, sources should be summarised in own words as much as possible)← Previous edit Revision as of 12:20, 5 August 2012 edit undoIndrek (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,958 edits →Industry moves away from 16:10 in 2008 to 16:9: rm unsourced claimsNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:
The primary reason for this move is considered to be production efficiency<ref name="engadget"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://forwardthinking.pcmag.com/displays/283041-where-displays-are-heading |title=Where Displays Are Heading |publisher=PC Magazine |last=Miller |first=Michael J. |date=2008-03-21 |accessdate=2012-07-09 }}</ref> - since display panels for TVs use the 16:9 aspect ratio, it's more efficient for display manufacturers to produce computer display panels in the same aspect ratio as well.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://techreport.com/discussions.x/15046 |title=DisplaySearch: Transition to 16:9 displays is 'unstoppable' |publisher=The Tech Report |last=Kowaliski |first=Cyril |date=2008-07-02 |accessdate=2012-07-09 }}</ref> A 2008 report by DisplaySearch also cited a number of other reasons including the ability for PC and monitor manufacturers to provide higher resolutions and diversify their products, "stimulating the growth of the notebook PC and LCD monitor market".<ref name="display">{{cite web|url=http://www.displaysearch.com/cps/rde/xchg/SID-0A424DE8-28DF6E59/displaysearch/hs.xsl/070108_16by9_PR.asp |title=Product Planners and Marketers Must Act Before 16:9 Panels Replace Mainstream 16:10 Notebook PC and Monitor LCD Panels, New DisplaySearch Topical Report Advises |publisher=DisplaySearch |date=2008-07-01 |accessdate=2011-09-08}}</ref> The primary reason for this move is considered to be production efficiency<ref name="engadget"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://forwardthinking.pcmag.com/displays/283041-where-displays-are-heading |title=Where Displays Are Heading |publisher=PC Magazine |last=Miller |first=Michael J. |date=2008-03-21 |accessdate=2012-07-09 }}</ref> - since display panels for TVs use the 16:9 aspect ratio, it's more efficient for display manufacturers to produce computer display panels in the same aspect ratio as well.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://techreport.com/discussions.x/15046 |title=DisplaySearch: Transition to 16:9 displays is 'unstoppable' |publisher=The Tech Report |last=Kowaliski |first=Cyril |date=2008-07-02 |accessdate=2012-07-09 }}</ref> A 2008 report by DisplaySearch also cited a number of other reasons including the ability for PC and monitor manufacturers to provide higher resolutions and diversify their products, "stimulating the growth of the notebook PC and LCD monitor market".<ref name="display">{{cite web|url=http://www.displaysearch.com/cps/rde/xchg/SID-0A424DE8-28DF6E59/displaysearch/hs.xsl/070108_16by9_PR.asp |title=Product Planners and Marketers Must Act Before 16:9 Panels Replace Mainstream 16:10 Notebook PC and Monitor LCD Panels, New DisplaySearch Topical Report Advises |publisher=DisplaySearch |date=2008-07-01 |accessdate=2011-09-08}}</ref>


The shift from 16:10 to 16:9 has been met with a mixed response. The lower cost of 16:9 computer displays, along with the convenience of having the same aspect ratio in different devices, has been seen as a positive.<ref name="engadget"/> There has been discussion though whether 16:9 or the more squarish format 16:10 is most suitable aspect ratio for computer displays. Some people prefer the wider 16:9 aspect ratio better while others prefer the higher 16:10 and use the ] as an argument. Also some believe productivity-oriented tasks to benefit more from vertical resolution rather than horizontal and thus consider 16:10 displays to be more suitable for such tasks for that reason.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1723060/gateways-displays-common-sense |title=Gateway's 16:10 displays show common sense |publisher=The Inquirer |date=2010-07-16 |accessdate=2012-07-09 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2328932,00.asp |title=Stop Shrinking My Laptop Screen |publisher=PC Magazine |last=Ulanoff |first=Lance |date=2008-08-27 |accessdate=2012-07-09 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://vr-zone.com/articles/monitor-aspect-ratios--beyond-16-9-ipad-to-the-rescue-/13399.html |title=Monitor Aspect Ratios - Beyond 16:9, iPad to the rescue? |publisher=VR-Zone |last=Novakovic |first=Nebojsa |date=2011-08-26 |accessdate=2012-07-09 }}</ref> However actual studies have shown that there actually are productivity gains with a wider aspect ratio. <ref>http://productivepractices.com/content/monitors_and_productivity.php</ref> The shift from 16:10 to 16:9 has been met with a mixed response. The lower cost of 16:9 computer displays, along with the convenience of having the same aspect ratio in different devices, has been seen as a positive.<ref name="engadget"/> Some believe productivity-oriented tasks to benefit more from vertical resolution rather than horizontal and thus consider 16:10 displays to be more suitable for such tasks for that reason.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1723060/gateways-displays-common-sense |title=Gateway's 16:10 displays show common sense |publisher=The Inquirer |date=2010-07-16 |accessdate=2012-07-09 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2328932,00.asp |title=Stop Shrinking My Laptop Screen |publisher=PC Magazine |last=Ulanoff |first=Lance |date=2008-08-27 |accessdate=2012-07-09 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://vr-zone.com/articles/monitor-aspect-ratios--beyond-16-9-ipad-to-the-rescue-/13399.html |title=Monitor Aspect Ratios - Beyond 16:9, iPad to the rescue? |publisher=VR-Zone |last=Novakovic |first=Nebojsa |date=2011-08-26 |accessdate=2012-07-09 }}</ref> However actual studies have shown that there actually are productivity gains with a wider aspect ratio. <ref>http://productivepractices.com/content/monitors_and_productivity.php</ref>


=== Tablets === === Tablets ===

Revision as of 12:20, 5 August 2012

An 19-inch LCD monitor with an aspect ratio of 16:10.

16:10, also known as 8:5, is an aspect ratio mostly used for computer displays. The width of the display is 1.6 times its height.

LCD computer displays using the 16:10 ratio started to appear in the mass market from 2003. By 2008 16:10 had become the most common aspect ratio for LCD monitors and laptop displays. Since 2010, however, 16:9 has the become the mainstream standard, driven by the 1080p standard for high definition television.

History

Computer Displays

Industry moves towards 16:10 from 2003 to 2008

Until about 2003, most computer monitors had a 4:3 aspect ratio and some had 5:4. Between 2003 and 2006, monitors with 16:10 (8:5) aspect ratios became commonly available, first in laptops and later also in standalone monitors. Reasons for this transition were productive uses for such monitors, i.e. besides widescreen movie viewing and computer game play, are the word processor display of two standard letter pages side by side, as well as CAD displays of large-size drawings and CAD application menus at the same time.

In 2005-2008, 16:10 took over the position from 4:3 as the most sold aspect ratio for LCD monitors. At the time, 16:10 also had 90 percent of the notebook market and was the most common used aspect ratio for laptops. However, 16:10 had a short reign as the most common aspect ratio.

Industry moves away from 16:10 in 2008 to 16:9

Around 2008-2010, there was a rapid shift by computer display manufacturers to the 16:9 aspect ratio, and by 2011, 16:10 had almost disappeared from new mass market products.

The primary reason for this move is considered to be production efficiency - since display panels for TVs use the 16:9 aspect ratio, it's more efficient for display manufacturers to produce computer display panels in the same aspect ratio as well. A 2008 report by DisplaySearch also cited a number of other reasons including the ability for PC and monitor manufacturers to provide higher resolutions and diversify their products, "stimulating the growth of the notebook PC and LCD monitor market".

The shift from 16:10 to 16:9 has been met with a mixed response. The lower cost of 16:9 computer displays, along with the convenience of having the same aspect ratio in different devices, has been seen as a positive. Some believe productivity-oriented tasks to benefit more from vertical resolution rather than horizontal and thus consider 16:10 displays to be more suitable for such tasks for that reason. However actual studies have shown that there actually are productivity gains with a wider aspect ratio.

Tablets

Tablets became a popular during the late 00s. The first tablets were in 4:3 but 16:10 tablets became soon popular.

Mobile Phones

In late 00s 16:10 became very popular in mobile phones. During 2012 there has been a shift to 16:9, however, Apple still produces their mobile phones in 16:10.

Common screen resolutions of 16:10 screens

Name Dimensions Diagonal screen size
WXGA 1280×800 13–15 in (33–38 cm)
WXGA+ 1440×900 13–19 in (33–48 cm)
WSXGA+ 1680×1050 15–22 in (38–56 cm)
WUXGA 1920×1200 17–28 in (43–71 cm)
WQXGA 2560×1600 30 in (76 cm)

See also

References

  1. Knight, Dan (2008-09-19). "With 10% of the US Notebook Market, Where Will Apple Go Next?".
  2. ^ "Product Planners and Marketers Must Act Before 16:9 Panels Replace Mainstream 16:10 Notebook PC and Monitor LCD Panels, New DisplaySearch Topical Report Advises". DisplaySearch. 2008-07-01. Retrieved 2011-09-08.
  3. ^ Ricker, Thomas (2008-07-02). "Widescreen LCDs going widescreen by 2010". Engadget.
  4. NEMATech Computer Display Standards http://www.millertech.com/Technical_Specs.htm
  5. "Introduction--Monitor Technology Guide". necdisplay.com. Archived from the original on 2007-03-15. (currently offline)
  6. Miller, Michael J. (2008-03-21). "Where Displays Are Heading". PC Magazine. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
  7. Kowaliski, Cyril (2008-07-02). "DisplaySearch: Transition to 16:9 displays is 'unstoppable'". The Tech Report. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
  8. "Product Planners and Marketers Must Act Before 16:9 Panels Replace Mainstream 16:10 Notebook PC and Monitor LCD Panels, New DisplaySearch Topical Report Advises". DisplaySearch. 2008-07-01. Retrieved 2011-09-08.
  9. "Gateway's 16:10 displays show common sense". The Inquirer. 2010-07-16. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
  10. Ulanoff, Lance (2008-08-27). "Stop Shrinking My Laptop Screen". PC Magazine. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
  11. Novakovic, Nebojsa (2011-08-26). "Monitor Aspect Ratios - Beyond 16:9, iPad to the rescue?". VR-Zone. Retrieved 2012-07-09.
  12. http://productivepractices.com/content/monitors_and_productivity.php
Categories: