Misplaced Pages

User talk:WGFinley: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:45, 1 August 2012 editWGFinley (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,088 edits →ANI Incident: Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 20:21, 6 August 2012 edit undoThe Devil's Advocate (talk | contribs)19,695 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 35: Line 35:
Please see this ] concerning {{user|FkpCascais}} and other individuals' conduct on and off en.wiki. --<font face="xx-medium serif"> ]</font></font> <sub>(])</sub></font> 10:19, 24 July 2012 (UTC) Please see this ] concerning {{user|FkpCascais}} and other individuals' conduct on and off en.wiki. --<font face="xx-medium serif"> ]</font></font> <sub>(])</sub></font> 10:19, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
*Sorry I didn't review this sooner but havenot been on much. I reviewed the AN/I case. a checkuser has been involved and there's no evidence FkpCascais is involved. Since he was accused he's certainly entitled to reply and hasn't violated his TBAN. I see no evidence whatsoever it was him. I wish that you all could stop with the constant ] with each other, I'm doubtful you will though. --] (]) 03:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC) *Sorry I didn't review this sooner but havenot been on much. I reviewed the AN/I case. a checkuser has been involved and there's no evidence FkpCascais is involved. Since he was accused he's certainly entitled to reply and hasn't violated his TBAN. I see no evidence whatsoever it was him. I wish that you all could stop with the constant ] with each other, I'm doubtful you will though. --] (]) 03:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

I have filed an ] of the 9/11 topic ban issued back in April.--] (]) 20:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:21, 6 August 2012

Guy has had a major (positive) employment change, he's taking a bit of a wikibreak right now and may take longer to respond.
My Email Rules

Due to emails I get related to Admin or Medcom duties you need to know if you choose to email me using this link or by using the email user function my rules are as follows:

  1. I may not agree email is the appropriate place for the exchange, I will advise you on your talk page that I received the email and I think the conversation belongs on wiki.
  2. If I do elect to have an email exchange with you then it is privileged and confidential, you do not have my permission to post it publicly without asking to do so.
  3. Whether you follow my email rules is up to you but be aware I may refuse to engage in the use of email with you if you refuse to follow them.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13


This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

The most valuable of all talents is that of never using two words when one will do.

— Thomas Jefferson

ANI Incident

Please see this section concerning FkpCascais (talk · contribs) and other individuals' conduct on and off en.wiki. -- ◅PRODUCER (TALK) 10:19, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Sorry I didn't review this sooner but havenot been on much. I reviewed the AN/I case. a checkuser has been involved and there's no evidence FkpCascais is involved. Since he was accused he's certainly entitled to reply and hasn't violated his TBAN. I see no evidence whatsoever it was him. I wish that you all could stop with the constant battlegrounding with each other, I'm doubtful you will though. --WGFinley (talk) 03:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

I have filed an appeal of the 9/11 topic ban issued back in April.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 20:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)