Misplaced Pages

User talk:Enochlau: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:31, 29 April 2006 editEnochlau (talk | contribs)18,866 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 12:20, 29 April 2006 edit undoInstantnood (talk | contribs)32,683 edits Re: Informal mediationNext edit →
Line 90: Line 90:
: (Replied on user page. ] (]) 23:14, 27 April 2006 (UTC)) : (Replied on user page. ] (]) 23:14, 27 April 2006 (UTC))
:: It's actually a large-scale revert war over many articles, mainly stylistic (whether Macau should be called "Macau, China", whether Cantonese should be called "Cantonese Chinese", and so forth). The main issue is that they have long ceased to communicate with each other; in fact, they frequently use reverting edit summaries as a talk page. ] <small>]</small> 03:16, 29 April 2006 (UTC) :: It's actually a large-scale revert war over many articles, mainly stylistic (whether Macau should be called "Macau, China", whether Cantonese should be called "Cantonese Chinese", and so forth). The main issue is that they have long ceased to communicate with each other; in fact, they frequently use reverting edit summaries as a talk page. ] <small>]</small> 03:16, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
==Re: Informal mediation==
<cite id=Re:_Informal_mediation_reply_1> </cite>Thanks so much Enoch. I welcome whatever way to help reach an eventual resolution, as long as it's fair, open and public, justice is ensured and guaranteed, with all parties involved participating, and are willing to justify their claims and points of view with solid evidence. &mdash; ]] 12:20, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:20, 29 April 2006

Hi! I welcome comments, suggestions and complaints.

Please use the + sign at the top of the page to add a new section. Do not simply edit this page and add it to the end. I will usually reply on your user talk page, unless you indicate otherwise. However, I will never reply via email, unless I know you personally.

This user is an administrator on the English Misplaced Pages. (verify)


Archives

I archive discussion from my user talk page, and because I simply cut and paste, you will need to check the revision history of this page if you want to quote a diff. As of 2006, each archive will contain 30 sections of discussion. Also, note that the dates below are in DD/MM/YYYY format.

  • 2004: 2004 (16/1/2004-29/12/2004)
  • 2005: 2005a (18/1/2005-28/11/2005), 2005b (2/12/2005-31/12/2005)
  • 2006: 2006a (2/1/2006-24/1/2006), 2006b (24/1/2006-7/2/2006), 2006c (7/2/2006-20/2/2006), 2006d (20/2/2006-29/3/2006), 2006e (29/3/2006-?)


Hamish Ross

Why did you delete Hamish Ross. That was a really nasty thing to do :(--84.67.148.195 23:19, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Exoskeletor

Sorry about before. i though why not to make a biography of me and some usefull freeware programs that i have make. My question is,, how a person can know that it worth to be here?

See WP:BIO. As a general rule, don't write about yourself. If you're notable enough to be in Misplaced Pages, someone else will write it. enochlau (talk) 04:08, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

About my programs? can i write informations about them like how to use them etc? there are free programs and if a reference to me is a problem i can remove it

See Misplaced Pages:Notability (software). Again, as a general rule, don't write about your own stuff. enochlau (talk) 04:12, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Album stubs

Please flesh out the stubs that you are writing, because they are falling into the WP:CSD category of "no content". If you do not wish to see them deleted, please at least write one full sentence in the article. Cheers. enochlau (talk) 04:18, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. I was going to fill them in later. I will include a brief sentence until I can finish them up. --Buzzard Joe 04:36, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

deletion of "Stepfather"

Hello Enochlau, sorry to bother you. I noticed you deleted my article about the album "Stepfather" by People Under the Stairs, based on the band being non-notable. I checked the criteria of band notability, and they meet at least one criteria, which is having undergone an international tour (to Europe and Japan, multiple times). This can be verified on their website, and likely other places (which I would be happy to lookup). I do understand if you havn't heard of them in Australia, but they are known in California. I also understand if I simply had written a poor article. It was my first. Thank you. Chiller1800

You need to make that clear in the body of the article that the album is from a notable band. In particular, linking to People Under the Stairs would have been a good idea. I now see that the deletion was a mistake, so feel free to recreate it with that in mind. Also, note WP:MOS - formatting articles properly makes them less likely to be treated as garbage. Cheers. enochlau (talk) 07:21, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Overkill album "!!!F*ck You!!!" notes...

Whats with the notes on the Overkill album page for the ep "!!!Fuck You!!!"? I understand the name probably sets off the 'vandalism' flags, but it is a real album, released by Megaforce/Atlantic Records in 1987.

What kind of verification do I need? Websites that catalog the album? I am holding it in my hand, I can scan pics of the back text in, ect.

I'm semi new editing here, so I am just adding album pages that don't exist so far. Thanks! SKELETOR666 11:05, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

(Replied on user page. enochlau (talk) 11:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC))

-cough- Team 37...very Notable.

Team 37 is certainly a very notable group. They deserve recognition, and there is no reason not to be mentioned on wikipedia.

Backtothefuture

I saw you deleted the Backtothefuture article. No I'm not an admin, but I would think that "afd" isn't really a good reason to delete articles. Also, backtothefuture is a user of Newgrounds. The article seemed to be neutral. Just dropping you a comment. Robot569 20:12, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

(Replied on user page. enochlau (talk) 00:01, 24 April 2006 (UTC))

Editor's Barnstar

Is this your first barnstar?

A Barnstar! The Editor's Barnstar
For tirelessly removing unencyclopedic matter from wikipedia, I award you the editor's barnstar. ßlηguγΣη
(Replied on user page. enochlau (talk) 10:49, 24 April 2006 (UTC))

gala galaction unverified info

Hi Enoch,

You put an "unverified" tag on the Gala Galaction article. can you tell me what specific claims you were refering to? Thank you, Eugen Ivan 23:47, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

(Replied on user page. enochlau (talk) 03:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC))

Liberal Stooge

Hi, I am the so called "Liberal Stooge". It was a joke that went too far and I will not vandalise the FSHS page in the future. -Liberal Stooge 23:47 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Good to see that you've woken up to your senses. I hope that you can contribute constructively in the future. enochlau (talk) 06:37, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

heya

this is not the same Enoch (aka Steve) who did SOFT1901 at USyd in 2004 is it? AlbinoMonkey 05:41, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

I did SOFT1901 at Usyd in 2004, but my name is not Steve. You might be confusing me with someone else. enochlau (talk) 06:45, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
huh, coincidence then. apologies. AlbinoMonkey 10:14, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Instantnood and Alanmak

I recently had to block both Instantnood and Alan for edit warring again, and both are at each other's throats. If you'd like to take the effort to mediate their disputes, whether through the Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal or just a casual discussion, I would really appreciate it. If not, I guess I'll file a mediation request and brace myself. Ashibaka tock 22:34, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

(Replied on user page. enochlau (talk) 23:14, 27 April 2006 (UTC))
It's actually a large-scale revert war over many articles, mainly stylistic (whether Macau should be called "Macau, China", whether Cantonese should be called "Cantonese Chinese", and so forth). The main issue is that they have long ceased to communicate with each other; in fact, they frequently use reverting edit summaries as a talk page. Ashibaka tock 03:16, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Re: Informal mediation

Thanks so much Enoch. I welcome whatever way to help reach an eventual resolution, as long as it's fair, open and public, justice is ensured and guaranteed, with all parties involved participating, and are willing to justify their claims and points of view with solid evidence. — Instantnood 12:20, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Category: