Revision as of 12:27, 28 June 2012 editShakbok (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users915 edits →Delta's Memphis Seasonal Service is No More← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:36, 27 August 2012 edit undoConifer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,663 edits →Requested move: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
Please be advised Delta will cancel service to Memphis; not suspended for the season. Delta has been reducing the size of its Memphis hub ever since the Delta and Northwest merger. | Please be advised Delta will cancel service to Memphis; not suspended for the season. Delta has been reducing the size of its Memphis hub ever since the Delta and Northwest merger. | ||
] (]) 12:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC) | ] (]) 12:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Requested move == | |||
{{requested move/dated|multiple=yes | |||
|current1=Seattle–Tacoma International Airport|new1=Seattle-Tacoma International Airport|current2=Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport|new2=Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport|}} | |||
* ] → {{no redirect|Seattle-Tacoma International Airport}} | |||
* ] → {{no redirect|Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport}} | |||
– An RfC at the ] failed to reach consensus on whether hyphens or en dashes should be used in the names of airports. There's been no activity on the RfC for over a week now, so I'm bringing it here for community attention. I set up this RM to change the dashes to hyphens simply because hyphens are more widely used here on Misplaced Pages. Depending on which style is accepted by consensus, the title of airports can be moved to standardize them. ]] <sup>]</sup> 23:36, 27 August 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:36, 27 August 2012
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Seattle–Tacoma International Airport article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 4 months |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Seattle–Tacoma International Airport article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 4 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
ANA Boeing 787 service
I remember reading something not long ago that ANA planned to start service with their brand-new 787s to SEA. Can anyone confirm this? I'm not sure if they announced a firm date, but it should still be mentioned in this article. —Compdude 17:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- ANA does plan to start operating the 787 to Seattle sometime during this fiscal year (April 2012 through March 2013). However without a firm date and with such an uncertain timeframe for launch, I don't see why it's notable to mention the new route here yet. SempreVolando (talk) 06:39, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- Okay that's what I thought. Yes, I know it doesn't belong in the table but it should still be mentioned as prose in this article. —Compdude 15:03, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yes. Mention it in prose somewhere in the article but don't include it in the table until a firm date is announced. There is already a hidden note saying so. Snoozlepet (talk) 02:14, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Is it notable though? Two airlines already fly from Seattle to Japan and it wouldn't be the first Asian carrier to serve the airport. SempreVolando (talk) 15:41, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- It will be the airport's first 787 service unless other carriers have applied to fly to Seattle with 787s. Snoozlepet (talk) 01:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think that's notable - it's just a plane. What about the first 737 service to Seattle, or 757, or 777 etc..? None of those are mentioned, and notability is not temporary. ANA already fly the 787 to Frankfurt Airport, but there's no mention of it there. We can't add the details every time an airport starts getting a regular 787 service. SempreVolando (talk) 03:22, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Alright then. I was just curious as to when the 787s would be flying into Seattle, and so I could marvel at how dang quiet they are. But since there is no firm date currently, I will just have to wait until there is. —Compdude 04:54, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think that's notable - it's just a plane. What about the first 737 service to Seattle, or 757, or 777 etc..? None of those are mentioned, and notability is not temporary. ANA already fly the 787 to Frankfurt Airport, but there's no mention of it there. We can't add the details every time an airport starts getting a regular 787 service. SempreVolando (talk) 03:22, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- It will be the airport's first 787 service unless other carriers have applied to fly to Seattle with 787s. Snoozlepet (talk) 01:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Is it notable though? Two airlines already fly from Seattle to Japan and it wouldn't be the first Asian carrier to serve the airport. SempreVolando (talk) 15:41, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yes. Mention it in prose somewhere in the article but don't include it in the table until a firm date is announced. There is already a hidden note saying so. Snoozlepet (talk) 02:14, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Delta's Memphis Seasonal Service is No More
Please be advised Delta will cancel service to Memphis; not suspended for the season. Delta has been reducing the size of its Memphis hub ever since the Delta and Northwest merger. Shakbok (talk) 12:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Requested move
It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move |
- Seattle–Tacoma International Airport → Seattle-Tacoma International Airport
- Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport → Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport
– An RfC at the Airports WikiProject failed to reach consensus on whether hyphens or en dashes should be used in the names of airports. There's been no activity on the RfC for over a week now, so I'm bringing it here for community attention. I set up this RM to change the dashes to hyphens simply because hyphens are more widely used here on Misplaced Pages. Depending on which style is accepted by consensus, the title of airports can be moved to standardize them. David1217 23:36, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- C-Class aviation articles
- C-Class airport articles
- WikiProject Airports articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of High-importance
- C-Class Washington articles
- High-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- C-Class Seattle articles
- High-importance Seattle articles
- WikiProject Seattle articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Requested moves