Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rtmcrrctr: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:12, 25 December 2011 editAndyTheGrump (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers54,013 edits comment← Previous edit Revision as of 02:09, 5 September 2012 edit undoStillStanding-247 (talk | contribs)4,601 edits →Mitt edit warNext edit →
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


::Yes, thanks. It might have been a little longer if it actually reported the one salient fact about Grech that seems to have attracted the most media attention: that he admitted to faking an e-mail that was to become central in the ] affair - though even with this seemingly-relevant bit of information, it would still fail to pass our notability requirements. ] (]) 21:12, 25 December 2011 (UTC) ::Yes, thanks. It might have been a little longer if it actually reported the one salient fact about Grech that seems to have attracted the most media attention: that he admitted to faking an e-mail that was to become central in the ] affair - though even with this seemingly-relevant bit of information, it would still fail to pass our notability requirements. ] (]) 21:12, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

== Ryan edit war ==

You're at 3RR on ]. Please take a look at ] and consider reverting yourself. ] (]) 02:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:09, 5 September 2012

Re Wikileaks Revolution redirect

Please note that it is TOTALLY AGAINST POLICY to delete a redirect in the manner you have. Please see Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion for the correct way to approach this. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:33, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Godwin Grech

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Godwin Grech, please note that Misplaced Pages cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/national/national/general/who-is-godwin-grech/1549572.aspx. As a copyright violation, Godwin Grech appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Godwin Grech has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Godwin Grech and send an email with the message to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. See Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Godwin Grech with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Godwin Grech.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Misplaced Pages must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Misplaced Pages takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:59, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Note that a very close paraphrase (such as you have used for a substantial portion of the article) can also constitute a copyright violation. I can see little evidence that an article on Grech would meet Misplaced Pages notability requirements either. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:59, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Page had already been deleted as WP:BLP1E, this version is even smaller than the original, and has been returned to a redirect as WP:CSD#G4.  Ronhjones  21:07, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Yes, thanks. It might have been a little longer if it actually reported the one salient fact about Grech that seems to have attracted the most media attention: that he admitted to faking an e-mail that was to become central in the Utegate affair - though even with this seemingly-relevant bit of information, it would still fail to pass our notability requirements. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:12, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Ryan edit war

You're at 3RR on Paul Ryan. Please take a look at WP:3RR and consider reverting yourself. I'm StillStanding (24/7) (talk) 02:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC)