| Revision as of 18:01, 5 September 2012 editF382d56d7a18630cf764a5b576ea1b4810467238 (talk | contribs)20,803 edits →Gallery: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:56, 8 September 2012 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,204 edits →Closure of the report at the edit-warring noticeboard: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| You must add new section for galleries, and that before "See also", "References", and "External links" section. Like . Please, check your additions, and add that title, in order to fix those articles. And, always, keep it cool. If you have any problem with usage of images, raise a talk page question about it, and talk to it, up to the solution. All best, be well. :) --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]<sup>]</sup></span> 18:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC) | You must add new section for galleries, and that before "See also", "References", and "External links" section. Like . Please, check your additions, and add that title, in order to fix those articles. And, always, keep it cool. If you have any problem with usage of images, raise a talk page question about it, and talk to it, up to the solution. All best, be well. :) --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]<sup>]</sup></span> 18:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Closure of the report at the ] == | |||
| CrnoBelo, please see the result of ]. Both you and Sohac121 are warned for edit warring about images of churches in articles on Serbian villages. If reverts continue before there is any serious effort to find consensus, blocks are possible. I'm leaving you a notice of the provisions of the ] decision. Be aware that ] is familiar with the article in dispute and both of you might ask him for suggestions. Whether it was intentional or not, moving images of churches based on which denomination it was might be considered to be expressing an ethnic or religious viewpoint. If you want a systematic change in placement of churches based on population try opening a ], or discuss the matter at ]. Thank you, ] (]) 00:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| | image = yes | |||
| | The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. | |||
| Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> | |||
| | valign = center | |||
| | ] | |||
| }} ] (]) 00:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:56, 8 September 2012
Gallery
You must add new section for galleries, and that before "See also", "References", and "External links" section. Like this. Please, check your additions, and add that title, in order to fix those articles. And, always, keep it cool. If you have any problem with usage of images, raise a talk page question about it, and talk to it, up to the solution. All best, be well. :) --WhiteWriter 18:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Closure of the report at the edit-warring noticeboard
CrnoBelo, please see the result of WP:AN3#User:CrnoBelo reported by User:Sokac121 (Result: Both warned). Both you and Sohac121 are warned for edit warring about images of churches in articles on Serbian villages. If reverts continue before there is any serious effort to find consensus, blocks are possible. I'm leaving you a notice of the provisions of the WP:ARBMAC decision. Be aware that User:WhiteWriter is familiar with the article in dispute and both of you might ask him for suggestions. Whether it was intentional or not, moving images of churches based on which denomination it was might be considered to be expressing an ethnic or religious viewpoint. If you want a systematic change in placement of churches based on population try opening a WP:Request for comment, or discuss the matter at WP:WikiProject Serbia. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
File:YesThe Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Balkans. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.