Revision as of 20:18, 2 May 2006 edit208.47.97.198 (talk) Yo' dude its getting old what you are doing← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:47, 2 May 2006 edit undoSparsefarce (talk | contribs)1,519 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Please put new messages at the ''TOP'' of the page.''' | '''Please put new messages at the ''TOP'' of the page.''' | ||
==Mannaseejah May 2, 2006== | |||
You are the vandal, I am not implimenting a bizzare rant, I am providing the truthful alternative to the lies. I am not harming you. I am not effecting you in any way. I am adding to the clarity of not only the information on a little webpage which you claim MY LORD does not have dominion over (fool), but I am seeking to greatly effect the evolution of mankind in spiritual as well as physical means. THIS IS WHAT MANNA IS. | You are the vandal, I am not implimenting a bizzare rant, I am providing the truthful alternative to the lies. I am not harming you. I am not effecting you in any way. I am adding to the clarity of not only the information on a little webpage which you claim MY LORD does not have dominion over (fool), but I am seeking to greatly effect the evolution of mankind in spiritual as well as physical means. THIS IS WHAT MANNA IS. | ||
Revision as of 20:47, 2 May 2006
Please put new messages at the TOP of the page.
Mannaseejah May 2, 2006
You are the vandal, I am not implimenting a bizzare rant, I am providing the truthful alternative to the lies. I am not harming you. I am not effecting you in any way. I am adding to the clarity of not only the information on a little webpage which you claim MY LORD does not have dominion over (fool), but I am seeking to greatly effect the evolution of mankind in spiritual as well as physical means. THIS IS WHAT MANNA IS.
Both Rome/Church and Mason/State want to keep it a secret because by holding this very important key they are keeping people like yourself and myself in division. THE EVIDENCE IS OBVIOUS. Other information on that page is blatantly wrong and yet it is left alone "as a viable theory" THIS IS BULLSHIT. Its not a cactus or a cricket or sap, none of these things make even the slightest bit of sense in the context of the subject (THEY DO NOT FIT THE DESCRIPTION) Using scientific methodology one finds that the only viable answer is that manna is in fact a mushroom. I READ THE ARAMAIC!
ARAMAIC SAYS CLEARLY IN ALMOST EVERY PHRASE AND WORD STRUCTURE THAT IT IS A MUSHROOM. Do Jews read a "translation" of the torah? Do mulslims read the "interpretation" of the koran? NO THEY BELIEVE STRONGLY THAT TO DO SO DEFEATS THE ENTIRE PURPOUS. And yet christianity has been led to believe that they are reading an acurate translation, when in fact it is merely some DICTATOR'S INTERPRETATION. King James is the reason that the forefathers of the US ditched the lame island, and the US if it stops acting stupid may be the new Israel.
By keeping people from realizing that there is so much more that alludes to the sacred mushroom than they are even capable of knowing, you (dispite your lack of caring) are sinning very badly and rather than take up the law of the Torah which would call for something I'd rather not mention, I will side with christ and buddha in longsuffering and mercy in dealing with your ignorance. It is not your fault you are in darkness, but you should at least attempt to find the light.
May God have Mercy on your soul.
--Mannaseeyah
PS: As an anarchist I would think that you should be against the very church and state which I oppose, instead you have been fed by the thought police (via telivision and music and all other propiganda) which brainwashes you into believing that you are something other than their puppet. I will pray for the puppet. It is because of ignorance that you are this way, I still do not think you are a bad guy. Your actions irritate the hell out of me though. (side-note I was born in Sacramento in 1984)
PPS, I will work on my "objectivity" even though science now indicates that by the very act of watching and documenting what we see we change the outcome of what takes place, therefore EVERYTHING is subjective. There is no such thing as objectivity. We are all one. Unfortunately you are subjected to inferior brain chemistry, once again I will pray for you. You really should take sacrament.
PPPS: If this were just some random vandalism wouldn't I do it to the vatican's page? THINK. I love you brother, thank you for keeping me on my toes, I am sure I will need the practice.
Leave the word alone
My creator wanted me to send you a message...
Stick to comic books and leave the Holy Cannon to those who understand the aramaic.
Sorry I know it's harsh, but the manna page is a very critical part of human evolution. I am biased, I know God. Once again: please respect the fact that this is a valuable opportunity to educate people on the mystery, the truth and nature of the counterfit placebo sacrament implimented by the people that crucified the savior (rome). I really do not mean to be a badguy or a "vandal", on the contrary I seek to enlighten mankind. Once again I appologize for the nature of the above remark, but I'm just the messenger.
Yah bless.
- i'm glad you can at least realize that you are biased. now, i suggest that you re-educate yourself on what wikipedia is and is not. in your case, wikipedia is not a soapbox. if you want to put bizarre religious rants up on the internet, wikipedia is NOT the place to do it. please go elsewhere, or i will have to ask for an administrator to intervene and stop you. you may believe that you are morally obliged to act how you are acting, but in the case of following the rules and guidelines of wikipedia, i believe that i am correct.
- as far as being a "badguy" or a "vandal" keep in mind that blanking talk pages is OBVIOUS vandalism.
- your "creator" may have wanted you to send me a message, but fortunately your god is not the god of wikipedia.
Steve's Backyard Boxing
Thoughts on an SBB article? Vanity/not notable or relevant? I'm on the side of relevant, but alas, the article I started was deleted once it was vandalized. Psyphics 17:52, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Internet phenomenon
Please make sure when you revert vandalsim, as you did on the Internet phenomenon talk page, that you look through the edits and revert back to the last non-vandal edit, not just to the previous edit. the vandals are sneaky ..... BabuBhatt 03:42, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
strampop
With regards to your vote on strampop's AfD: with you as a member of the , I would have expected a more sensible reason. Perhaps your membership there is questionable? Please return, should you wish, with more concrete proposals. Otherwise one might actually assume that YOU are a sockpuppet. Would you really want that? Kilbosh 11:19, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- i urge you to look at my user contributions if you seriously think i'm a sock puppet. as far as the vote, yes i am an inclusionist, but i am also a sensible human being. this was obviously a completely made up word with absolutely no verifiability. i made other votes that day... all for inclusion. Sparsefarce 17:42, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Michael Moore
Great idea! I'm eager to see if it works. --Hansnesse 03:54, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Sparsefarce, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Khoikhoi 02:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC)