Revision as of 00:32, 4 May 2006 editFrancs2000 (talk | contribs)39,062 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:50, 4 May 2006 edit undoObnoxious Owl (talk | contribs)9 editsm correctionNext edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:You copied and pasted the ] article to ]. This is blatant vandalism. Misplaced Pages may well be communism, but you're not being unblocked to experience it. Good bye. -- ]<font color="green">]</font>] ] 00:32, 4 May 2006 (UTC) | :You copied and pasted the ] article to ]. This is blatant vandalism. Misplaced Pages may well be communism, but you're not being unblocked to experience it. Good bye. -- ]<font color="green">]</font>] ] 00:32, 4 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
Look. I know how much you are willing to v-protect this page to shut me down for good, like other nuts like ]; but you have to admit there's much worse I could have done, such as . Now that user deserved to be blocked. But what I did wasn't anything like that, so therefore: | |||
{{unblock|What I said above}} |
Revision as of 00:50, 4 May 2006
I was only trying to help this encyclopedia. I did nothing wrong. Now unblock my ass before I bring out the guns against Misplaced Pages
- Threatening will not help your case. You were blocked using a previous username for the exact same act of blatant vandalism you just tried to pull off. We will not be unblocking this acount any time soon. -- Francs2000 00:24, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Quit your bitching. All I did was just change a title of an article and its discussion page. I removed no content. I added no swear words. I can't believe accounts get blocked so quickly. No wonder Misplaced Pages is Communism!
- You copied and pasted the New York Yankees article to New York Yankees SUCK -- GO RED SOX!!!. This is blatant vandalism. Misplaced Pages may well be communism, but you're not being unblocked to experience it. Good bye. -- Francs2000 00:32, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Look. I know how much you are willing to v-protect this page to shut me down for good, like other nuts like User:Billy Bob Balasta; but you have to admit there's much worse I could have done, such as this. Now that user deserved to be blocked. But what I did wasn't anything like that, so therefore:
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Obnoxious Owl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What I said aboveNotes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=What I said above |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=What I said above |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=What I said above |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}