| Revision as of 19:42, 7 October 2012 editEauOo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled680 edits →October 2012← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:33, 7 October 2012 edit undoArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users46,227 edits →Senkaku Islands clarification request: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| :I removed also. Do not post such comments on article talk pages. ] (]) 19:42, 7 October 2012 (UTC) | :I removed also. Do not post such comments on article talk pages. ] (]) 19:42, 7 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Senkaku Islands clarification request == | |||
| Hi Masanori Asami; I am a member of the Arbitration Committee. Your in the pending clarification request about the ''Senkaku Islands'' arbitration decision has serious issues with its presentation and readability. I have therefore removed this statement entirely, and you may not re-add it. Please re-write your old statement so that it is understandable, and re-submit your improved version only. You must use paragraphs and clear English. Do not attempt to submit your old statement, nor another unreadable submission. If you require assistance in writing your statement, you should contact a ]. ] ]] 21:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:33, 7 October 2012
I am writing Daikon-island now.Masanori Asami 00:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
浅見さんはどうしてそんなに大根島に執着するのですか？
どうしてですか？Everton 09:56, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
返事が非常に遅くなってすみません。 ノーマークで噴火口付近に保育園とかがある大根島が噴火の危険があると思ったからです。
(Masanori Asami (talk) 10:41, 30 September 2012 (UTC))
Ryukyus
In English, "Ryukyu Islands" refers to everything between Taiwan and Kyushu, even if there are different names in Japanese.—Ryulong (琉竜) 13:30, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- I wrote the definition of "Ryukyu Islands" different from Japanese definition of "琉球諸島". Japanese definition of "琉球諸島" does not incluide Amami islands, but I wrote the definition of "Ryukyu Islands" include Amami islands.
- Moreover, according to your definition of "Ryukyu Islands", you cannot understand the phraze of "Nansei Shoto south of 29° north latitude (including the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands)" in the article 3 of "Treaty of San Francisco".
- For the word "Ryukyu Islands", most important aim is to understand the article 3 of "Treaty of San Francisco".Misplaced Pages must provide the definition that the interpretation of the treaty is possible.
- (Masanori Asami (talk) 14:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC))
- This is the English Misplaced Pages which focuses on the English definition of the phrase. It is stated multiple times on the page that Amami is not part of Japanese Ryukyu already, and you removed other large portions of the page for unexplained reasosn. And stop bringing up the Treaty of San Francisco. It is not relevant to the discussions and it is pointless to link to the Wikisource page. The English speaking world refers to the Nanseis as the "Ryukyus".—Ryulong (琉竜) 14:47, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- I don't understand the relevance of the treaty either. It simply says "south of 29°", which just means south of 29°. If it means more than that, you will need a 2ary source to justify that; otherwise it's WP:SYNTH. — kwami (talk) 16:14, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- This is the English Misplaced Pages which focuses on the English definition of the phrase. It is stated multiple times on the page that Amami is not part of Japanese Ryukyu already, and you removed other large portions of the page for unexplained reasosn. And stop bringing up the Treaty of San Francisco. It is not relevant to the discussions and it is pointless to link to the Wikisource page. The English speaking world refers to the Nanseis as the "Ryukyus".—Ryulong (琉竜) 14:47, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- South of 29° north latitude of Ryukyu Archipelago was not only the phrase in Treaty of San Francisco, but also historically the largest territory of the Ryukyu-Kingdom (琉球王国Ryūkyū Kingdom) in the begining of 17th centry, and geographically the north end of the Amami Islands(奄美群島).(Masanori Asami (talk) 00:31, 4 October 2012 (UTC))
- Stop quoting the treaty. It is becoming clear you are here to push a nationalistic point of view and that will not be tolerated.—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:41, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- By what reason, did you label me a nationalist? I'm afraid you lack the ability of reading, and I think I am far from a nationalist or a patriot of Japan.(Masanori Asami (talk) 07:49, 4 October 2012 (UTC))
- Because you've been unnecessarily disrupting the articles and pages on multiple projects.—Ryulong (琉竜) 07:57, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- By what reason, did you label me a nationalist? I'm afraid you lack the ability of reading, and I think I am far from a nationalist or a patriot of Japan.(Masanori Asami (talk) 07:49, 4 October 2012 (UTC))
- Stop quoting the treaty. It is becoming clear you are here to push a nationalistic point of view and that will not be tolerated.—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:41, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- South of 29° north latitude of Ryukyu Archipelago was not only the phrase in Treaty of San Francisco, but also historically the largest territory of the Ryukyu-Kingdom (琉球王国Ryūkyū Kingdom) in the begining of 17th centry, and geographically the north end of the Amami Islands(奄美群島).(Masanori Asami (talk) 00:31, 4 October 2012 (UTC))
I have brought up your actions on WP:ANI.—Ryulong (琉竜) 07:54, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 14:44, 4 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
– Richard BB 14:44, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Arbitration clarification
See here. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 16:59, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Don't edit archived discussions like Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Senkaku Islands. That only discussed the disruption caused over the naming of the article on the Senkaku Islands on the English Misplaced Pages. It should remain unedited since the case's closure. Also, it should not be renamed anyway. The issues you are bringing up are on the whole unrelated to whether or not the English Misplaced Pages should have used "Senkaku", "Diaoyu", or "Pinnacle" for the name of the island group.—Ryulong (琉竜) 05:31, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
October 2012
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. —Ryulong (琉竜) 15:01, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- I removed the edit also. Do not post such comments on article talk pages. Eau(W)oo (talk) 19:42, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Senkaku Islands clarification request
Hi Masanori Asami; I am a member of the Arbitration Committee. Your statement in the pending clarification request about the Senkaku Islands arbitration decision has serious issues with its presentation and readability. I have therefore removed this statement entirely, and you may not re-add it. Please re-write your old statement so that it is understandable, and re-submit your improved version only. You must use paragraphs and clear English. Do not attempt to submit your old statement, nor another unreadable submission. If you require assistance in writing your statement, you should contact a clerk. AGK 21:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)