Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Pé de Chinelo: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:48, 9 October 2012 editMarnetteD (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers333,261 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 20:02, 9 October 2012 edit undoKww (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers82,486 edits repaired reportNext edit →
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
{{SPIpriorcases}} {{SPIpriorcases}}


{{subst:SPI report
|checkuser=no
<!-- Please do not enter anything in the subject/headline box!


=====<big>09 October 2012</big>=====
If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above this comment to checkuser=yes
{{SPI case status|}}


;Suspected sockpuppets
For the list of suspected sockpuppets, you may use up to sock20 and ip20. If there are more than 20 socks or IPs, list them after creating the report by duplicating the {{checkuser}} and {{checkip}} templates.

-->
|sock1=Diego daniel maldonado * {{checkuser|1=Diego daniel maldonado}}

|sock2=

|sock3=
<!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts-->
|ip1=
* <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small>
|ip2=

|ip3=
|evidence=We have had to deal with this editor for a few years now. The bulk of the evidence dealing with this current incarnation will relate to this project ] from earlier this year. In my work on that project I came across the fact that Pe had edited under the names {{user|Marcos Marcelino dos Santos}} and {{user|Mateus Marcelino dos Santos}}. While neither of these were tied to him at the time I mention them now as an example of his penchant for long user names. After noticing this new editor going to articles that had previously been edited by Pe I began to check the edit and found that right from the start he was doing exactly the same kinds of things as in the past. In the project linked above we found, time and again, the he enjoyed adding studios to film articles that had nothing to do with the making of the film. Here is just one of several hundred examples . We have had to deal with this editor for a few years now. The bulk of the evidence dealing with this current incarnation will relate to this project ] from earlier this year. In my work on that project I came across the fact that Pe had edited under the names {{user|Marcos Marcelino dos Santos}} and {{user|Mateus Marcelino dos Santos}}. While neither of these were tied to him at the time I mention them now as an example of his penchant for long user names. After noticing this new editor going to articles that had previously been edited by Pe I began to check the edit and found that right from the start he was doing exactly the same kinds of things as in the past. In the project linked above we found, time and again, the he enjoyed adding studios to film articles that had nothing to do with the making of the film. Here is just one of several hundred examples .


So: So:
#Second article edited (another editor had already caught the incorrect info on the first article edited) he added two studios that had nothing to do with the film to the studio portion of the infobox and added Disney Studios as a distributor. Adding the Disney name is another of his habits as well as editing Disney articles. #Second article edited (another editor had already caught the incorrect info on the first article edited) he added two studios that had nothing to do with the film to the studio portion of the infobox and added Disney Studios as a distributor. Adding the Disney name is another of his habits as well as editing Disney articles.
#Next article added Pathe as the makers of the film even though they had nothing to do with it. This is another of his favorite names to add to article infoboxes as can be seen here #Next article added Pathe as the makers of the film even though they had nothing to do with it. This is another of his favorite names to add to article infoboxes as can be seen here
#Next article Again added a studio that had nothing to do with the film and compounded things by hiding it as an {{WP:EGG|EGG]] #Next article Again added a studio that had nothing to do with the film and compounded things by hiding it as an ]

⚫ Other edits are cosmetic and a few are okay but that is another hallmark of Pe's socks. I am continuing to check the rest of this new socks edits but I wanted to file this ASAP when I found too many that fit the old pattern. &mdash;](]) 20:01, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small>


⚫ Other edits are cosmetic and a few are okay but that is another hallmark of Pe's socks. I am continuing to check the rest of this new socks edits but I wanted to file this ASAP when I found too many that fit the old pattern.


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======




----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->
<!-- Enter your evidence above. You do not need to sign it - it will be signed for you. -->
<!-- PLEASE SUPPORT YOUR EVIDENCE WITH DIFFS; IT IS NOT UP TO ADMINS, CLERKS OR CHECKUSERS TO ESTABLISH YOUR ARGUMENT FOR YOU. -->
|admincomment=
<!-- Any comment here will go directly into the "Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments" section.
DO NOT write anything here unless you are one of those three and know what you are doing. Just leave it blank otherwise.
You MUST sign your comment with ~~~~. This feature is intended for pro forma reports (reports made for the record only, no action is required).
WARNING: Writing anything here will cause the case to be marked as CLOSED for the clerks to review and archive. -->
}}

Revision as of 20:02, 9 October 2012

Pé de Chinelo

Pé de Chinelo (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Pé de Chinelo/Archive.



09 October 2012

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets


We have had to deal with this editor for a few years now. The bulk of the evidence dealing with this current incarnation will relate to this project Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Film/Vandalism by 201.19.*.* from earlier this year. In my work on that project I came across the fact that Pe had edited under the names Marcos Marcelino dos Santos (talk · contribs) and Mateus Marcelino dos Santos (talk · contribs). While neither of these were tied to him at the time I mention them now as an example of his penchant for long user names. After noticing this new editor going to articles that had previously been edited by Pe I began to check the edit and found that right from the start he was doing exactly the same kinds of things as in the past. In the project linked above we found, time and again, the he enjoyed adding studios to film articles that had nothing to do with the making of the film. Here is just one of several hundred examples .

So:

  1. Second article edited (another editor had already caught the incorrect info on the first article edited) he added two studios that had nothing to do with the film to the studio portion of the infobox and added Disney Studios as a distributor. Adding the Disney name is another of his habits as well as editing Disney articles.
  2. Next article added Pathe as the makers of the film even though they had nothing to do with it. This is another of his favorite names to add to article infoboxes as can be seen here
  3. Next article Again added a studio that had nothing to do with the film and compounded things by hiding it as an EGG

Other edits are cosmetic and a few are okay but that is another hallmark of Pe's socks. I am continuing to check the rest of this new socks edits but I wanted to file this ASAP when I found too many that fit the old pattern. —Kww(talk) 20:01, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: