Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Space Cadet: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:06, 10 October 2012 editSkäpperöd (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,457 edits ←Created page with '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=yes <!-- Please do not enter anything in the subject/headline box! If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above ...'  Revision as of 15:49, 11 October 2012 edit undoCoren (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,492 edits →10 October 2012: Yeah, obviousNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
{{SPIpriorcases}} {{SPIpriorcases}}
=====<big>10 October 2012</big>===== =====<big>10 October 2012</big>=====
{{SPI case status|CUrequest}} {{SPI case status|checked}}


;Suspected sockpuppets ;Suspected sockpuppets
Line 22: Line 22:


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======
*Obvious sock is obvious. {{Confirmed}} to be each other (and thus to having clearly violated the topic ban). &mdash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 15:49, 11 October 2012 (UTC)



----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 15:49, 11 October 2012

Space Cadet

Space Cadet (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Space Cadet/Archive.

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:

10 October 2012

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets


This response by Space Cadet on Skoranka's talk page looks like a login to the "wrong" account. SC is topic banned in 2010 from the subject discussed there because of year-long edit wars about placenames. Scarcely used before, the Skoranka account since 2011 exclusively made such placename-related edits matching SC's preference (compare report). During the same period, SC was active only occasionally . SC's edit to Skoranka's talk page is within the scope of the topic ban, as SC is banned also from discussions regarding German naming issues - why would SC break his ban, of all places possible, at Skoranka's talk page after a long period of inactivity? What led SC there at all, just to make a comment sounding more like a response of the accused than like a comment of a third party. The situation resembles SC's earlier socking .

@CU: SC 29 Jul 22:31 vs Skoranka 29 Jul 22:35 - both accounts then stopped editing, so the 3-months-period is almost up, please check soon. Skäpperöd (talk) 10:06, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: