Misplaced Pages

Talk:Liberté-class battleship/GA1: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Liberté-class battleship Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:20, 11 October 2012 editParsecboy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators184,174 edits →GA Review← Previous edit Revision as of 19:01, 19 October 2012 edit undoMathewTownsend (talk | contribs)14,937 edits GA passNext edit →
Line 24: Line 24:
*"with good success" - with success? used successfully in the Navy's experiments .. *"with good success" - with success? used successfully in the Navy's experiments ..
**Good point. Thanks for reviewing the article, Mathew. ] (]) 22:20, 11 October 2012 (UTC) **Good point. Thanks for reviewing the article, Mathew. ] (]) 22:20, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

'''] review-see ] for criteria''' (and ''']''' for what they are not)

#Is it '''reasonably well written'''?
#:a. prose: ], respects ], correct spelling and grammar:{{GAList/check|y}}
#::
#:b. complies with ] for ], ], ], ], ] and ]: {{GAList/check|y}}
#::
#Is it '''factually accurate''' and ''']'''?
#:a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the ]: {{GAList/check|y}}
#::
#:b. provides ] from ] where necessary: {{GAList/check|y}}
#::
#:c. ]: {{GAList/check|y}}
#::
#Is it '''broad in its coverage'''?
#:a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic: {{GAList/check|y}}
#::
#:b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see ]): {{GAList/check|}}
#::
#Does it follow the '''] policy'''.
#:fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
#::
#Is it '''stable'''?
#: no ], etc: {{GAList/check|y}}
#::
#Does it '''contain ]''' to illustrate the topic?
#:a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have ]: {{GAList/check|y}}
#::
#:b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with ]: {{GAList/check|y}}
#::
#'''Overall''':
#:Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
#:: Pass!
#:: <!-- Template:GAList -->
*Congratulations! ] (]) 19:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:01, 19 October 2012

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 21:43, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Alright, I'll review this to add to my collection! MathewTownsend (talk) 21:43, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

I've made the following edits which you're free to change.

Those all look fine to me. Parsecboy (talk) 22:20, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
  • "was a group of four pre-dreadnought battleships of the French Navy. The class comprised Liberté, the lead ship, Justice, Vérité, and Démocratie." - not readily clear why only three visited the US.
    • None of the sources say why, so I'd prefer not to speculate.
  • "Two years later, Liberté's forward magazines exploded in Toulon harbor, destroying the ship and killing approximately 250 of her crew." -why does the body of the article continue after the "The explosion aboard Liberté killed some 250 officers and men. The wreck was left in Toulon until 1925, when it was raised and broken up for scrap."?
    • I don't know that I follow. Are you asking why Liberte's ultimate fate isn't in the lead?
  • "after the revolutionary British HMS Dreadnought," - after the revolutionary design of the British HMS Dreadnought?
    • I don't think there's a problem with calling the ship revolutionary versus its design - isn't the design part implied in the first? The sentence is already fairly wordy, and I don't really want to make it longer.

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:
    b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, summary style and list incorporation:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:
    b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
    c. no original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
    fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    no edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Pass!